“marginally significant”

For the immediate feedback condition, the interaction of group by block was marginally significant, ( F (1, 23) = 1.93, p = 0.09).

The results of these tests revealed that only appearance effects were significant for the expressive ( F 1,91 =5.9; P =.03), useful ( F 1,91 =13.75; P <.001), durable ( F 1,91 =3.83; P =.05), and smooth ( F 1,91 =23.78; P <.001) subscales, marginally significant for the graceful subscale ( P =.09) but not significant for the controllable subscale.

We found a marginally significant trend for sites predicted using the −7 kcal/mol threshold to improve on sites predicted using the 0 kcal/mol threshold (P-value = 0.09, Methods ).

A marginally significant difference between the two emphasizes was observed: t (47) = −1.71, P = 0.09, d = −0.25), which was also indicated by a weak interaction between salience and performance (F (1, 47) = 2.95, P = 0.09, η p 2 = 0.39, Fig. 3A2 ).

The correlation between this threat effect and the interaction term from the ANOVA on fixations was marginally significant, r = 0.331, p = 0.09.

Also, the level of this variable in the combined group was more than that in the GSC group and marginally significant: (OR = -0.09, 95% CI: -0.67-9.30, P = 0.090) ( Figure 2 ).

Although a treatment effect ( P < 0.0001) was observed in the determination of mechanical nociception threshold among all treatment groups, meloxicam expressed marginally significant effects ( P = 0.09) among NSAID treated groups dehorned.

On multivariate analysis, the presence of LVSI remained as a marginally significant predictive factor associated with a worsened progression-free survival (HR: 1.99, 95% CI: 0.90–4.20, P = 0.09) after controlling for high-grade serous carcinoma ( P = 0.26) and stage ( P < 0.001).

The marginally significant variance in individual slopes for pain catastrophizing (σ2=1.00; P =.09) and the negative intercept-slope covariance (σ=−0.38; P =.09) suggest that participants with higher baseline catastrophizing tended to show a more pronounced decrease over time.

The results showed a marginally significant effect of friends’ number on materialism ( β = 0.10, t = 1.69, p = 0.09), which partially supported Hypothesis 1.

However, associations were not significant between ERS and SBP/DBP among untreated participants ( p > 0.05) in the four external independent cohorts, except a marginally significant association between ERS and DBP ( β = 0.40, p = 0.09) in Rhineland untreated participants (Supplemental Table 11).

Additionally, there was a marginally significant positive correlation between NN50 (HRV) and the purpose in life and personal growth dimensions of the PWB scale ( r s = 0.34, p = 0.09 and r s = 0.34, p = 0.09, respectively; Figures 7 and 8 ).

Post hoc analyses showed that children in the low grade responded more slowly than the children in middle and high grades (ps < 0.05), and children from the middle grade exhibited longer reaction times than the ones in the high grades (p = 0.09, marginally significant).

Also, while treatment with glucose didn’t have a significant effect on glucose levels in wild-type crickets (t30 = − 1.04, P = 0.309), it caused a marginally significant increase in glucose levels of mutant crickets (t30 = 1.75, P = 0.090).

The difference in depression scores between the two groups was marginally significant [ t (71) = 1.72, p = 0.09], with greater depression scores exhibited in the HP group than in the LP group ( Table 1 ).

Apart from a marginally significant effect of age ( p = 0.09), no other effects or interactions were significant ( p ’s ≥ 0.13).

Gender was a marginally significant factor for depression ( r = 0.04, p = 0.09).

The overall model for emotion to gender switching was marginally significant [ R 2 = 0.24, adjusted R 2 = 0.10, F (15,75) = 1.581, p = 0.09].

The interaction between time and group was marginally significant, F (2, 71) = 2.50, p = 0.090, η p 2 = 0.02, as did the main effect of group , F (2, 71) = 2.45, p = 0.094, η p 2 = 0.04.

Nonetheless, it should be noted that the interaction effect of renal dysfunction (creatinine level) and treatment was marginally significant (P-value = 0.090), suggesting the higher adverse effect of DIG+/BB+ on mortality in patients with renal dysfunction comorbidity.

Last, our study demonstrated a non-statistically but marginally significant improvement in term of ORR (71.4% vs. 51.6%; P = 0.09) or PFS (18.5 vs. 11.7 months; P = 0.07) with the addition of metronomic oral cyclophosphamide.

Comparison of models with and without predator measures using the reduced dataset from 1997 onwards indicated a marginally significant positive association between abundance of raptors and counts of Western Sandpiper (total raptor count: β raptors = 0.075, SE = 0.044, t = 1.70, p = 0.09) and counts of Pacific Dunlin (total raptor count: β raptors = 0.050, SE = 0.032, t = 1.53, p = 0.12). 3.4.

This difference was not significant for UBW, MAC, MAMC ( P > 0.05); was marginally significant for BMI, TSF ( P = 0.09, P = 0.06) and was significant for BSF ( P = 0.001).

The marginally significant group effect (F(2, 27) = 2.6, p = 0.09) was due to a reduced pre-stimulus alpha activity in the cc compared to the mc group (t(22) = 2.7, p < 0.01; one-tailed) and the dc group (t(16) = 1.9, p < 0.04; one-tailed; Fig. 2d ).

month of measurement, was not statistically significant 1 minute after intake (P = 0.53), but marginally significant 15 minutes after intake (P=0.09).