“marginally significant”

The interaction between time and group was marginally significant, F (2, 71) = 2.50, p = 0.090, η p 2 = 0.02, as did the main effect of group , F (2, 71) = 2.45, p = 0.094, η p 2 = 0.04.

The difference in depression scores between the two groups was marginally significant [ t (71) = 1.72, p = 0.09], with greater depression scores exhibited in the HP group than in the LP group ( Table 1 ).

3 ) decreased slightly faster for ASD (0.047/year) than TD (0.038/year), a finding that was marginally significant ( p = 0.09).

If the standardized coefficients of the interaction terms were significant ( p < .05) or marginally significant ( p < .09), we conducted a simple slope test to examine the interaction effect at different levels to explain the moderating effect further. 3 Results Table 1 shows the results for calculated means and standard deviations, maximum and minimum as basic descriptive statistics.

Women who transitioned to retirement reported marginally significant increases in GDS scores (β = 0.32, 95% CI: -0.04–0.68, p = 0.09).

There were strong, significant, positive linear relationships between species diversity and spectral diversity using band depth in the summer of 2014 for the 350–499 nm wavelength region ( R 2 = .41, p = .03), the 500–589 nm wavelength region ( R 2 = .35, p = .04), and the 590–674 nm wavelength region ( R 2 = .43, p = .02), and a marginally significant positive relationship in the 675–754 nm wavelength region ( R 2 = .26, p = .09; Figure 6 ).

The interaction between nepotism and frontier was marginally significant, F (1,312) = 2.91, p = 0.09, η p 2 = 0.009.

This difference is statistically significant for the contrast with high school–educated women ( p < .001) and marginally significant for the contrast with women without high school education ( p = .09).

Repeated measures ANOVA with factors of electrode (C3 and C4), condition (control, learned, and transposed songs), and frequency (theta, mu, beta, and gamma) revealed a main effect of frequency ( F (3,13) = 2988.37, p = 1.0 e − 3) and a marginally significant interaction between frequency and electrode ( F (3,13) = 2.65, p = 0.09).

hybridum , variation in plant damage among populations was marginally significant ( F 9, 148 = 2.54, P = 0.09; Appendix S1: Figure S2 ).

Interestingly, all four sexual systems are present in both subgenera, with a statistically similar frequency ( P > 0.43 for all the sexual systems, except for hermaphroditism, that showed marginally significant differences P = 0.09) (Fig. 3 ).

Notably, the interaction among IC ability, emotional valence and language was marginally significant, F (1, 82) = 2.940, p = 0.090, η p 2 = 0.035.

After controlling for various covariates, neighborhood SDI was a marginally significant negative predictor in postpandemic year 1 (odds ratio = 0.91, CI: 0.82, 1.01 [ P = 0.09]), and a significant negative predictor of screening in postpandemic year 2 (odds ratio = 0.90, CI: 0.81, 0.99 [ P = 0.047]) (Figure 3 c).

Percent changes in the quadriceps muscle CSA in the RT + HP group were significantly greater than those in the CON, HP and RT groups ( P < 0.05, Table 2 ), and percent changes in the quadriceps muscle CSA between the RT and CON groups were marginally significant ( P = 0.09, Table 2 ).

Based on the chi-squared test, the difference was marginally significant ( P = 0.09).

Indeed, we examined the correlation analysis between cycling performance (i.e., mean and peak power in 10-second sprint cycling) and urinary 8-OHdG, and we found that the relationships between these exercise performances and the oxidative damage were marginally significant, respectively (mean power: r = –0.44, P = 0.09; peak power: r = –0.49, P = 0.06).

TLE In TLE, higher exercise scores were associated with higher performance on CVLT Learning [ rho (28) = 0.38; p = 0.049], CVLT delayed recall [ rho (28) = 0.47; p = 0.01]; and VPA immediate recall [ rho (28) = 0.46; p = 0.01], of which all survived a 5 % FDR correction for multiple comparisons except for CVLT Learning, which became marginally significant after correction ( p = 0.09).

In the same direction, marginally significant medium-sized effects of verbal suggestions on skin temperature increase were found in the open-label [ F (1,41) = 3.01, p = .090, Cohen’s d = 0.54] and closed-label groups [ F (1,43) = 2.93, p = .094, Cohen’s d = 0.52], respectively.

F s(2, 236) > 3.65, p s < 0.05, partial η 2 s > 0.03, and marginally significant for ability, F (2, 236) = 2.43, p = 0.09, partial η 2 s = 0.02.

The correlation between English and German was marginally significant: r (16) = .41, p = .09.

For non-canonical sentences a marginally significant interaction of C × G was found (F(1,40) = 2.97, p = .09), which was due to a significant main effect of C for the native group only (F(1,18) = 8.56, p < .01).

= 0.44, p = 0.034), and marginally significant for the number of first/last author D1 publications (corr.coeff. = 0.32, p = 0.09—see Fig. 3 d).

No significant differences were found in the TELP and control groups, except in MBI (mean change 2.5, P = 0.04) and GDS (mean change 2, P = 0.03), and a marginally significant change in MMSE (mean change 1.33, P = 0.09) in TELP.

There was a marginally significant genotype effect on the feeding of the caterpillars (Table 5 ; genotype effect P = 0.09).

LargeBlur is marginally significant ( p = 0.09).