“marginally significant”

In addition, there was a marginally significant negative relationship between N R + N B and the fraction of leaf N allocated to light harvesting ( N LH ; r 2 = 0.15; P = 0.085; Fig. 6 d).

5 Supplemental individual-level analysis using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model ( Kenny et al., 2006 ) showed convergent results; the Actor × Partner interaction was marginally significant, b = -171.33, SE = 8.49, t (102) = -1.74, p = 0.085 95% CI[-366.68, 24.21].

The linear model found all the factors to be significantly associated with eGFR90 change except for a history of diabetes and emergency surgery, which were marginally significant ( p = 0.085 and p = 0.063, respectively).

Interestingly, the NalRifR702 strain declined faster in the persistence phase than the wt strain ( t -tests, p = 0.032 assuming a power law, or marginally significant if one assumes an exponential decay in the phase, p = 0.085, Table 1 , Figure 3 ), even if these mutations (Nal, Rif, or NalRif) did not affect the decay rate in the persistence phase ( p > 0.05, Table 1 , Figure 2 ).

Using this difference score as our dependent measure and group as fixed factor, we found a marginally significant main effect of group, F (2, 138) = 2.51, P = 0.085, ηp2 = 0.035 (this is analogous to an interaction effect using repeated measures ANOVA with a group factor and an age factor: the statistics are identical).

The correlation coefficients were statistically significant for the left NAc subregions (core: r = −0.333, p = 0.024; shell: r = −0.297, p = 0.045) and marginally significant for the right NAc subregions (core: r = −0.257, p = 0.085; shell: r = −0.287, p = 0.053). 3.5. rsFC analysis between pre- and post-treatment in patients In the MDD group, the four NAc subregions showed increased rsFC with the bilaterial MCC, medial frontal gyrus, right putamen, and cerebellum after antidepressant treatment (voxel-level p < 0.001, cluster size ≥ 20 voxels).

The effect of Openness was found to be marginally significant ( β = 0.15, CI 95 − 0.02 to 0.33, p = 0.085, equivalent to an increase of $19 in willingness to pay; see Table S23 for zero-order correlations and Tables S24 – 25 for full regression outputs).

Surgical fees showed a significant downward baseline trend (β 1 = −39.951, p < 0.001), a marginally significant level decrease (β 2 = −1442.363, p = 0.085), and a significant upward slope change (β 3 = 68.107, p < 0.001).

The effects of mecamylamine were generally greater in the Nic + Mec EVEN group compared to the Nic + Mec ALL group, a difference that was significant on test days 4 and 6 (q = 6.2 and 5.2, respectively, p < 0.01) and marginally significant on test day 2 and 8 (q = 3.4 and 3.3, respectively, p = 0.085 and 0.095).

In contrast to the first three sampling times, wherein the main effect of movement speed was either significant (PeakVel: F (2,38) = 70.58, p < 0.0005; EOT: F (2,38) = 21.14, p < 0.0005) or marginally significant (EOT + 1 s: F (2,38) = 2.76, p = 0.085), the main effect of movement speed was absent at EOT + 2 s (F (2,38) = 0.91, p = 0.417) and at all subsequent time points.

In the model adjusting for both the primary IgA and primary IgG V1V2 readouts, vaccine recipients with positive 92TH023-V1V2-specific complement activating antibodies had a significantly lower infection risk than vaccine recipients with negative response (OR = 0.42, P-value = 0.048, Table 3 ), and a similar marginally significant result was found for A244-V1V2 (OR = 0.49, P-value = 0.085, Table 3 ).

The different modes of retail also show a marginally significant difference among them ( p = 0.085), as species substitution was found only for products sold as fresh fillets or as restaurant meals ( Fig.

This revealed a marginally significant main effect of Color Swap ( F (1,34) = 3.158, p = 0.085, η 2 p = 0.085), no effect of Reward Magnitude ( F <1), and an interaction between the factors ( F (1,34) = 4.944, p = 0.034, η 2 p = 0.127).

5 A) showed a marginally significant main effect between trials (F = 3.18, p = 0.085, partial η 2 = 0.102, medium effect), as did the HF index (F = 3.211, p = 0.084, partial η 2 = 0.103, medium effect) and the DFA α1 index (F = 4.163, p = 0.051, partial η 2 = 0.129, large effect).

A marginally significant finding ( p = 0.085) indicated that male oncologists obtained higher scores with respect to instrumental coping and emotional-cognitive manifestations than did female oncologists.

Overall, the odds of mental health distress increased by a marginally significant 22% (OR 1.22 [CI 0.99–1.49] p = 0.085).

This symptom was more common among case-patients who died (though marginally significant, p = 0.0851).

Full linear regression analyses, including slope and intercept comparisons between meadow types, revealed no significant relationship for species ( p = 0.575) and a marginally significant one for genera ( p = 0.0852).

The score for interest was a marginally significant trend (t(89)=2.07, p = .0853) only for students who selected radiology or cardiology (Figure 2 ).

Interestingly, we noticed that several marginally significant enriched pathways were consistent with previous findings 42 , including G-protein coupled receptor activity (Mann–Whitney U-Test, P = 8.54 × 10 −2 ).

Participants in the control group at the six-month follow-up presented with a marginally significant increase of perceived stresses (t=0.18, p=0.0859), trauma symptomatology (t = 1.7, p = 0.105) and depression (t = 1.9, p = 0.059).

However, in depth analysis of the correlations between SV and the network connections in the flourishing network yielded only one marginally significant correlation with the connection between lFusG and lAngG ( r = 0.26, p = 0.086).

After excluding these subjects, the mixed-model ANOVA revealed a significant effect for block, F (2) = 93.73, p < 0.001, a marginally significant interaction between Block ⋅ Group, F (2) = 2.52, p = 0.086, and a significant groups effect, F (1) = 4.14, p = 0.047.

A similar marginally significant difference between groups was also detected when averaging the three individual beliefs into one variable, F (1, 76) = 3.02, p = 0.086, M control = 4.83, SE = 0.17; M experimental = 4.35, SE = 0.22, η p a r t i a l 2 = 0.04.

Surprisingly, intrapersonal synchrony became marginally significant in the opposite direction at this third step, B = −0.18, SE = 0.10, t = −1.72, p = 0.086.