“marginally significant”

This resulted in significant effects of salience for the durations of 60 ms [ F (2, 14) = 12.968, p = 0.001] and 120 ms [ F (2, 14) = 14.958, p < 0.001], and a marginally significant effect of salience for the duration of 480 ms [ F (2, 14) = 2.985, p = 0.083].

There was no significant main effect of parent sex on dyadic coping, but there was a marginally significant main effect of parent age on dyadic coping ( p = 0.083), such that older age predicted poorer dyadic coping.

For faceplate contact during the CS1 period, we found a significant effect of session ( F 13,260 = 17.372, p < 0.0001) and condition ( F 1,20 = 5.535, p = 0.029), but only a marginally significant effect of sex ( F 1,20 = 3.324, p = 0.083).

Results Behavioral results Cardiovascular fitness For cardiovascular fitness, we found a significant SESSION by GROUP interaction [ F (4, 41) = 2.79, p = 0.031, η 2 = 0.12], a marginally significant effect for GROUP [ F (2, 41) = 0.19, p = 0.083, η 2 = 0.01], but no significant main effect for SESSION [ F (2, 41) = 1.54, p = 0.220].

The association between utilisation of SRH referral services and age was marginally significant ( P = 0.083).

This finding was marginally significant in both crude (IRR: 1.004; p = 0.083) and adjusted analysis (aIRR: 1.004; p = 0.103).

However, Eff_N a and latitude showed a marginally significant relationship ( p = .0838, r 2 = .361, deviance explained = 55.3%; Figure S4 ). 3.2 Contemporary rates of gene flow Included in the gene flow analyses were all individuals from Austria (n = 64), Czech Republic ( n = 19), England ( n = 48), France ( n = 124), Georgia ( n = 27), Germany ( n = 108), Italy ( n = 15), Norway ( n = 30), Poland ( n = 29), Scotland ( n = 40), Serbia ( n = 52), Slovakia ( n = 20), Spain ( n = 20), Sweden ( n = 21), and Switzerland ( n = 52).

A significant negative correlation was also found between the DDF score and the functional connectivity between the right insula and right anterior cingulate cortex (T = -2.2412, p = 0.03165, r = -0.3588), and a marginally significant correlation was found between the DDF score and the functional connectivity between the right insula and left anterior cingulate cortex (T = -1.7812, p = 0.08380, r = -0.2922).

There was a significant positive correlation between global distance and distance between numerators (r = 0.476; p <0.001), and a marginally significant correlation between global distance and distance between denominators (r = -0.183; p = 0.084).

The Mann–Whitney U test showed a nonsignificant (marginally significant) difference between dmft scores of boys and girls ( p = 0.084, Figure S2 ). 3.3.

In contrast, profiles like UC3 (expecting to have a secure life) show a positive but marginally significant moderation effect on ACEF when interacting with verification status ( UC3 × VS , 0.017, p = 0.084), indicating a slight increase in engagement for users who prioritize security.

The incongruency effect for an incidental cue in the second position was marginally significant ( t (19) = 1.8, p = 0.084, Figure 2B ).

The predictor “kind” was marginally significant, t (57) = −1.76, p = .084.

In contrast, Lactobacillus was least abundant in April (1.95%), increased in May (9.69%), and peaked in September (10.69%), showing a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.084).

12.1%, P = 0.800) time intervals, the difference in PONV incidence between the continuous infusion group and the single injection group was marginally significant at the 6-24 h time interval (13.6 vs. 27.3%, P = 0.084) ( Fig. 1 ).

A significant increase of total bilirubin (+1.97 mg/dL [+0.77; +3.44]; P =0.004) and a marginally significant decline in eGFR (−9.5 mL/min/1.73 m 2 [−16; −2]; P =0.084) were observed during the treatment with DTG plus ATV/r.

The analyses revealed a significant main effect of Text Genre ( F (7.79) = 15.14, p < .001) and a marginally significant main effect of Reading Proficiency ( F (7.79) = 1.88, p = .084).

Furthermore, we found that rs204993 showed marginally significant genotypic ( P = 0.084; OR = 1.561; 95% CI, 0.939–2.596) associations with SCZ in males, but not in females. 4.

4.380 μV; t (46) = −2.902, p = 0.006); the group difference was marginally significant for the T3-T6 pair, where the amusic group again displayed reduced P3b amplitude (1.002 μV vs. 1.908 μV; t (46) = −1.767, p = 0.084); but the group difference was not significant for the T1-T4 pair (1.355 μV vs. 1.624 μV).

loss) as within factors, revealed a significant main effect of choice types, F (2, 20) = 3.336, p = 0.049, a significant main effect of valence, F (2, 20) = 8.251, p = 0.009, and a marginally significant interaction effect, F (2, 20) = 2.831, p = 0.084(see Fig.3B ).

There was a marginally significant difference in economic status ( P = 0.084), with a higher proportion of patients reporting good economic conditions in the intervention group (81.4% vs 68.1%) ( Table 1 ).

Although the differences were marginally significant, females spent less time in Iberia ( χ 2 = 2.99, df = 1, p = .084) and crossed the Strait of Gibraltar to Africa earlier than males ( χ 2 = 3.30, df = 1, p = .070).

Statistical analysis of HDL subfractions after supplementation with omega-3 and omega-6 FAs showed a significant difference in the level of L-HDL2 ( p = 0.011) subfraction and a marginally significant difference in L-HDL1 ( p = 0.084) and L-HDL3 ( p = 0.070) subfractions after 6 weeks of supplementation as well as S-HDL8 ( p =0.078) subfraction after 12 weeks of supplementation between the Om3 and Om6 groups ( Supplement Table S3 ).

Carrying the 677T allele was associated with a marginally significant 27.00 g increase in infant birth weight (95% CI: −3.76 to −59.47, P = 0.084).

We observed no significant group differences in Glu levels, while GABA levels exhibited a marginally significant increase in the treated MDD group ( p = 0.084, see Table S3).