“marginally significant”

‘Arkansas Traveler’ showed less heat susceptibility in chlorophyll fluorescence, which contradicts with the results from our previous cultivar screening in the growth chamber and open field study ( Bhattarai et al., 2021 ), possibly due to different plant developmental stage, soil type and temperature regimes, but leaf ROS contents were still lower in ‘Celebrity’ under heat stress at a marginally significant level ( P = 0.083).

Additionally, it was determined that the mediation effect of the GC response on the Ac-H3 expression was marginally significant ( p = 0.083) and accounted for approximately 62% of the total effect relative to its indirect effect, suggesting that the GC response may influence the Ac-H3 expression indirectly through altering the expression of NF-κB.

The correlation between sACCl and mFPl showed a marginally significant increase after sadness provocation only in the high-sadness group (Fig. 6A , right, paired sample t -test p = 0.083 for high-sadness and p = 0.26 for low-sadness ).

However, these main effects need to be qualified by the marginally significant interaction between group and picture type, F (1, 62) = 3.11, p = .083, η p 2 = .048, which was of moderate effect size.

There were also large and significant decreases in patients’ depressive, anxiety, and anger symptoms ( d s −1.39 to −1.93) and a large, marginally significant decrease in patients’ insomnia ( d = −0.85; p = 0.083).

When we controlled for the effect of environmental variables in a partial RDA, the spatial dimension of the RDA was marginally significant and explained 3.1% of the genetic variation ( p <0.083; Table 4 ).

According to Figure 3 , a set of independent sample t -tests showed that the SIN perception threshold μ of the NH group was significantly lower than that of the TN group only under speech masking’s colocation condition ( t = 2.460, p = 0.024) and marginally significant under noise masking’s colocation condition ( t = 1.836, p = 0.083) but not under noise masking’s separation condition ( t = 0.926, p = 0.367) or speech masking’s separation condition ( t = 0.689, p = 0.500).

There was also a marginally significant interaction with Grammaticality and Height (β Gramm⨉Height = -119 ms, [-237 ms, 22, ms]; t = -1.7, p = .083).

Ordinal logistic model based on COVID-19-specific mortality The overall model regressing on having one or more pulmonary conditions was marginally significant (p-value = 0.083) with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.8205 and 95% confidence interval (CI) of (0.9140, 3.5607).

Although marginally significant ( p = 0.083), youth (those aged 18–24) had a 40% increase in discontinuation compared to those aged 25 years and older. 3.4 HIV seroconversion Among 15 seroconversions observed in the study, seven occurred in transgender women without a reported history of PrEP use.

After taking the test, by True Overplacement, all but the Japanese significantly decrease their estimates (-6.78%, p = .022; -8.07%, p = .002; -4.28%, p = .032; and 1.98%, p = .435, respectively), but all remain overplaced, significantly so for the Hong Kong Chinese (5.80%, p = .050) and Japanese (6.93%, p = .045) and marginally significant for the European Canadians (6.88%, p = .083).

Posthoc tests using Sidak corrections showed that there was a marginally significant difference between the ADHD group and the TD group ( p = .083), and between the ASD group and the TD group ( p = .055), with both the ADHD and ASD group having higher proportions of negative, non-mental descriptions.

There was also a marginally significant correlation between the DCDQ and the BPA divided attention test (r=0.646, p=0.083), which engages working memory abilities.

porphyraceus , Gallicolumba stairi ) were marginally significant among seasons (P = 0.083) and highly significantly among habitat types on Lakeba (P≪0.001), with more individuals recorded in the dry season, and more found in Mid-successional Forest than in any of the more disturbed habitats including Secondary Forest ( Figure 7 ; Table 5 ).

Emotional Well-being Subjective Well-being MDBF Mood The repeated-measure analysis yielded a significant main effect of “time,” F (1,34) = 12.29, p = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.266 , a marginally significant effect of the factor “group,” F (2,34) = 2.67, p = 0.083, η p 2 = 0.136 and a significant interaction between both factors, F (2,34) = 4.003, p = 0.027, η p 2 = 0.191 .

However, in the experiment at the continental scale, the presence/absence of the bacteria was marginally significant for an effect on the relative plant growth ( p = 0.083) and we observed the following trend: when the virus was absent, the presence of the bacteria limited plant growth, while in presence of the virus, the opposite was found (Figure 3B ).

Results from the ANOVA did not show significant differences between groups after the intervention; however, the experimental group showed a marginally significant increase in eye contact (F = 3.17; p = .083; effect size = 0.079) and the control group demonstrated a decrease in functional communication ( M Pre = 16.08, M Post = 11.31).

10 years or more); it was marginally significant ( P = 0.083) when controlling for disease duration measured continuously.

Two‐way repeated ANOVA (2 ROIs × 2 task conditions) analysis showed a significant main effect of ROI ( F (1, 25) = 4.446, p = .045, η p 2 = 0.151), a marginally significant main effect of task condition ( F (1, 25) = 3.270, p = .083, η p 2 = 0.116), and a significant ROI (rIFG/vertex) × task condition (painful/neutral) interaction ( F (1, 25) = 26.044, p < .0001, η p 2 = 0.510).

For faceplate contact during the CS1 period, we found a significant effect of session ( F 13,260 = 17.372, p < 0.0001) and condition ( F 1,20 = 5.535, p = 0.029), but only a marginally significant effect of sex ( F 1,20 = 3.324, p = 0.083).

Weighted connectance and weighted nestedness were positively related to the proportion of links removed from the original networks, yet these correlations were marginally significant (ρ = .61 and p = .083 for both metrics; Appendix S1 ). 4.

Post hoc comparison indicated UKMRC9 elicited a marginally significant lower insulin generation compared to UKMRC11 ( p = 0.083) and Jasmine ( p = 0.052) ( Figure 1 b).

A marginally significant linear association was observed between dietary vitamin E intake and SOS%/year ( p = 0.083).

Growth reduction due to WD was marginally significant in Cvi-0 ( P = 0.083), and not significant in Mt-0, Bay-0, Ler-1 and Est-1, which are accessions the most tolerant to WD ( Figure 4B ).

In the low-depression group, σ values also increased in association with those valence and arousal scores (see the left panels of Figure 4 ), resulting in a significant positive correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient) between the arousal scores and σ values ( r (28) = 0.40, p = 0.028) and a marginally significant correlation between the valence scores and σ values ( r (28) = 0.32, p = 0.083).