“marginally significant”

The analysis revealed a marginally significant interaction effect between the game type and the level of reasoning (F [1,30] = 3.270, p = .081, η p 2 = 0.098).

Furthermore, a marginally significant interaction of compatibility and transition, F (1, 21) = 3.36, p = 0.081, η p 2 = 0.14, was found.

Without the participant, the correlation between hearing aid use and BEPTA was marginally significant, r (13) = 0.501, p = 0.081.

Analysis of simple slopes of the significant interaction showed that the link between ST values and attitudes towards cooperative methods was positive in the ST condition and the control condition (combined effect, b = 0.17, SE = 0.06, t (116) = 2.93, p = .004, 95% CI [0.06, 0.29], η 2 = 0.07), but negative and marginally significant in the SE condition ( b = −0.16, SE = 0.09, t (116) = −1.76, p = .081, 95% CI [− 0.35, 0.02], η 2 = 0.03).

There was a marginally significant difference in laughing between PARO and Lion in both M-group ( p = 0.081) and in S-group ( p = 0.054).

Only the relationship of entitlement and peer-rated prestige became marginally significant when controlling for the gender composition of the dyad, β ^ = −.058, SE = .033, p = .081, 95% CI [−.122, .007].

Results revealed a marginally significant main effect of valence in mPFC F (2, 24) = 2.80, p = 0.081.

A significant interaction was found between stimulus timing and saccade direction ( F (12, 168) = 3.43, p < .01, f = 0.46), along with a marginally significant main effect of saccade direction ( F (1, 14) = 3.46, p = .081, f = 0.46).

At HTB group, significant reductions in blood lipid, insulin, TNF-αand adiponectin levels ( p < 0.05) and a marginally significant reduction in leptin levels ( p = 0.081) were also reported.

However, a marginally significant trend was observed regarding pathological grade ( P = 0.081).

The correlation between manual CO 2 effluxes and soil temperature was significant in one census only ( R 2 = 0.27, p = .002, n = 32), marginally significant in one census ( R 2 = 0.10, p = .081, n = 32), and not significant in the other two censuses ( R 2 = 0.05, p = .219, n = 32; R 2 = 0, p = .861, n = 32).

12 IU oxytocin) and olfactory condition (F 1, 70 = 5.65, p=0.020, partial η 2 = 0.075), on top of a strong main effect of olfactory condition (F 1, 70 = 20.63, p<0.0001, partial η 2 = 0.23) and a marginally significant interaction between social proficiency and oxytocin treatment (F 1, 70 = 3.13, p=0.081).

Results also showed a marginally significant difference in group, F (1, 62) = 3.02, p = 0.081, η p 2 = 0.49, with orphans eliciting more negative FRN (4.65 ± 0.60 μV) than controls (6.10 ± 0.59 μV), see Figure 4 .

Therefore, a Kruskal–Wallis test was used instead, yielding a marginally significant result (H = 5.026, p = 0.081).

The change score analysis reveals a marginally significant positive correlation between vaccination rate and the change in excess mortality from the first to the second pandemic year ( r = 0.45 , p = 0.081 ).

Success A binomial mixed-effects regression model with random slopes by round for each dyad and random slopes and intercepts by round for each target word indicated a marginally significant positive effect of round on success (β = 0.07, SE = 0.04, p = .081).

In addition to the main effect of BTA ( b = 3.10, z = 26.25, p < 0.001, e b = 22.15), the model indicated a marginally significant interaction between BMRQ and BTA ( b = 0.20, z = 1.743, p = 0.081, e b = 1.23).

Instead, bet height was significantly greater for target versus control color on guess and target trials (both p s < 0.001, η 2 s > 0.23) and marginally significant for swap trials t (32) = 1.80. p = 0.081, η 2 = 0.09 (notably, swap trials had reduced power due to low trial counts).

According to this test, 36 metabolites showed significant concentration differences in cerebellum of 12-week-old mice (permutation test, p=0.036) and 45 metabolites showed marginally significant differences in the cerebral cortex of 1-week-old mice (permutation test, p=0.081, Supplementary file 9 ).

Post-hoc comparison of individual group means showedasignificant ( p = 0.009) difference in dopamine between Aldh1a1 −/− ×Aldh2 −/− mice and wild-type controls at middle age, and a marginally significant decrease ( p = 0.081) in the oldest group.

The interaction between question type and required reasoning was marginally significant, F (1, 61) = 3.15, p = .081, η 2 = .05.

This analysis revealed an intercept’s estimate of 3.138 ( SE = 0.032, t = 97.249, p < 0.001); the individual-level helping tendency is a marginally significant predictor ( B = 0.028, SE = 0.016, t = 1.747, p = 0.081); COS is an insignificant predictor ( p = 0.202); and the country-level helping tendency is an insignificant predictor ( p = 0.242).

The interaction term for BLOCK × PROPORTION was marginally significant [ F (5, 16) = 2.43; p = 0.081].

There was a marginally significant effect of age on RT difference scores (LRT: χ 2 = 3.05, df = 1, P = 0.081; Table 4 ), revealing a trend for response-slowing being greater amongst younger animals.

The contribution of breed to predicting the beta-lactam level was marginally significant (p < 0.081).