“marginally significant”

neutral) stimuli, in both visual and olfactory modalities, decreased d’ and thus impeded discrimination between healthy and unhealthy food [ t (15) = −3.16, p < 0.01; disgust d’ = 1.91 (0.78); neutral d’ = 2.11 (0.62)] whereas an opposite, marginally significant trend emerged for the social stimuli: social disgust (vs. neutral) stimuli increased d’ [ t (15) = 1.89, p = 0.08; disgust d’ = 2.11 (0.72); neutral d’ = 1.98 (0.77)] and thus improved food healthiness discrimination.

The main effect of Stimulus was not significant, F (1,30) <1, p = .716, η 2 = .005, and the main effect of Condition was marginally significant, F (1,30) = 3.35, p = .08, η 2 = .10, but this was subsumed by a significant Stimulus x Condition interaction, F (1,30) = 14.42, p = .001, η 2 = .33.

Other main effects and interactions for the stroke characteristics were not significant (P > 0.01), except for the load effect on stroke curvature that was marginally significant (P = 0.08).

There was a marginally significant difference in the amount of first-person singular forms between phase 1 ( M = 5.19, SD = 5.77) and phase 2 ( M = 4.35, SD = 4.46); t 220 = 1.71, p = 0.08.

In all correlation analyses, a p ‐value =< .05 (without multiple comparison corrections) was accepted as statistically significant, though marginally significant results ( p =< .08) were also reported. 2.11.

We find a marginally significant relationship between identification and performance ( b = 11.53, p = 0.08 two-sided; note that as our hypothesis was directed, one-sided tests resulting in significance on the 5% level could also have been applied).

They also reported that in participants who completed more than 9 MET hours per week of PA relative to those who completed 0-9 MET hours per week of PA, there was a marginally significant increase in Progression Free Survival (HR = 0.83, 95% CI, 0.79-1.02; P = .08) and overall survival (HR = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.65-1.02; P = .07). 11 At 3 months follow-up ( N = 40), self-reported PA minutes/week increased ( P = .04) and anxiety was reduced ( P = .02).

For a number of species, this interaction was marginally significant (F 64.7 = 2.04, p = 0.08).

Total activity count showed a marginally significant relationship with hand pain ( p = 0.08, p-nonlinear = 0.35), with higher activity count associated with greater hand pain relief over time.

Additionally, marginally significant associations with maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein levels were observed in both full-term (β = –0.02, 95% CI: –0.05 to 0.01; P = 0.08) and preterm infants (β = –0.12, 95% CI: –0.23 to 0.01; P = 0.05).

4a ), we found a significant interaction between time-period and layer effects ( F = 30.34, P = 0.0004) at 10–25 Hz and a marginally significant interaction ( F = 3.90, P = 0.080) and period effect ( F = 3.75, P = 0.085) at 25–40 Hz (Supplementary Fig. 4a ), as well as a significant layer effect during the cue and delay periods (Fig. 3b ; F = 11.58, P = 0.0078 for cue; F = 5.54, P = 0.043 for delay).

Participants with low/mid-frequency hearing impairment used insulin more frequently and oral medications less frequently (marginally significant, P = 0.08).

citri The cumulative adult psyllid-days was negatively related to flush shoot hardness ( y = 2.63–1.7 x , df = 1, 2; R 2 = 0.84), albeit marginally significant ( P = 0.08) ( S1 Fig ).

Further tests of heterogeneity using the Q-statistic also support this conclusion, although the P -value is marginally significant ( P = .0801).

There was a marginally significant difference in the amount of predation incurred between the states (State*Treatment interaction: F 1,54 = 3.2, P = 0.0804), with C. maculata eggs in Iowa soybean experiencing slightly higher predation than in Michigan fields (6.5±1.5 and 10.1±1.1 eggs remaining in predator accessible egg masses in Iowa and Michigan respectively).

Results There were significant main effects for target emotion F (3, 1.421) = 13.869, p < .001, and distracting emotion F (3, 1,421) = 21.165, p < .001, an interaction between target and sex of the actor F (3, 1.421) = 3.734, p = .011, and marginally significant interactions between sex of the actor and distractor F (3, 1.421) = 2.103, p = .081, and group * target F (3,1.421) = 2.160, p = .091.

The change score analysis reveals a marginally significant positive correlation between vaccination rate and the change in excess mortality from the first to the second pandemic year ( r = 0.45 , p = 0.081 ).

The analysis revealed a marginally significant interaction effect between the game type and the level of reasoning (F [1,30] = 3.270, p = .081, η p 2 = 0.098).

Only CAMS-R was found to be significantly correlated with valence rating of negative pictures ( r (20) = .634, p = .007) and also marginally significant in correlating with valence ratings of positive pictures ( r (20) = −.459, p = .081).

Univariate ANOVAs with the same design yielded significant period-by-group interactions for STD MARS ( p = .0016), Crashes ( p = .00003), |Mag| Joy ( p = .023), and %Destab ( p = .007), and a marginally significant interaction for D L ( p = .081).

This analysis revealed an intercept’s estimate of 3.138 ( SE = 0.032, t = 97.249, p < 0.001); the individual-level helping tendency is a marginally significant predictor ( B = 0.028, SE = 0.016, t = 1.747, p = 0.081); COS is an insignificant predictor ( p = 0.202); and the country-level helping tendency is an insignificant predictor ( p = 0.242).

Although the difference between epochs 1 and 10 was marginally significant, t (15) = 1.87, p = 0.081, the model reproduced the tendency of the reduction in the number of saccades to find a target even when the letter placement was repeated on randomly changing natural scenes ( Figure 13 ).

For the out-of-key notes, the overall multiple regression model was marginally significant, F (2, 20) = 2.86, p = 0.081, adj.R2 = 0.14, and mostly due to the relationship between the P600 amplitude and H-FA [β = 0.488, t (20) = 2.34, p = 0.030].

Additionally, a marginally significant association was reported between e-cigarette use frequency and having had bronchitis in the past year ( P = 0.081).

Furthermore, a marginally significant interaction of compatibility and transition, F (1, 21) = 3.36, p = 0.081, η p 2 = 0.14, was found.