“marginally significant”

Ammonium chloride, ammonium hydroxide, ammonium phosphate, and ammonium sulfate increased the ammonium content of the media ( t = 6.31, 3.85, 6.79, and 7.10, respectively, df = 12, P < 0.05) whereas ammonium bicarbonate produced a marginally significant increase ( t = 2.64, df = 12, P = 0.08).

The results of the 2SLS method of IV analysis were reported in Additional file 5 : Table S17 and the causal association of T2D with hypertension was marginally significant (OR = 1.334, 95% CI = 0.967–1.840; P = 0.080).

Marginally significant increases ( P = 0.08) in reports followed the 2017 Title IX guidance change (+ 1.18, + 4.51 and + 2.24 reports per 1000 enrolled students in 2017–2018, 2018–2019 and 2019–2020, respectively), and a marginally significant decrease (− 5.23 reports per 1000 enrolled students in 2020–2021) in SM reports to Title IX offices followed the 2020 Title IX iterations.

A marginally significant program effect was found for the SF-36 measures of general health ( p = 0.08), alcohol use ( p = 0.10), tobacco use ( p = 0.07), and depression ( p = 0.09).

Marginally significant heterogeneity across studies was observed in both categorical analysis ( I 2 : 60.7%, p = 0.08) and dose-response relationship analysis ( I 2 : 66.3%, p = 0.052).

Even after controlling for sociodemographic variables, inmates who reported problem drinking and psychedelic drug use experiences were about two times more likely to express suicidal ideation than their counterparts [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.43, p < 0.001 for problem drinking; adjusted OR = 2.13, p < 0.001 for drug use], while the association between physical activity and suicidal ideation was marginally significant (adjusted OR = 1.34, p = 0.08).

There was a marginally significant interaction among process, time, and context ( F (6,144) = 1.87, P = 0.08, η 2 = 0.07).

Results of these models indicated that smoking status partially mediated the relation between NSPs and health; the indirect effect tested using bootstrapped standard errors was marginally significant for smoking status ( p =0.08).

However, the 2 subgroups, problematic and routine use, exhibited marginally significant heterogeneity in their associations with subjective well-being ( P =.08; I 2 =68.3%).

First, as shown in Model 1 of Table 2 , upon controlling for demographic variables, leader autonomy-oriented help was positively associated with member self-efficacy (γ = 0.30, p < 0.001), while the effect of leader dependency-oriented help on member self-efficacy was marginally significant (γ = 0.06, p = 0.08).

Regression analysis showed that there was a marginally significant interaction between total life events and percent time spent in institutions on externalizing problems at age 16, B = 0.003, 95% CI [0.00, 0.01], β = 0.18, p = 0.08, and a significant interaction between the number of independent events and percent time in institutions on externalizing problems, B = 0.006, 95% CI [0.001, 0.01], β = 0.25, p = 0.01.

Post-hoc tests controlling for multiple testing found that speakers show a significant inverse relation of pupil size slope and frequency slope ( p < 0.005) and recipients show a marginally significant direct relation of pupil size slope and frequency slope ( p = 0.08).

There is a marginally significant interaction between CD38 and CD157 ( p < 0.08).

Post hoc testing revealed only a marginally significant decrease in flower visit duration in response to florivory compared to control (Tukey, p = 0.08), in the first experimental round.

After adjustment, the difference in PDFF remained marginally significant ( p = 0.08), possibly indicating early compositional changes associated with biomechanical factors.

We also observed marginally significant positive main effects of time ( β = 0.001, 95% CI [−0.000, 0.002], t (93) = 1.773, p =.080) and significant effects of period ( β = 0.168, 95% CI [0.055, 0.281], t (93) = 2.945, p =.004).

For salivary cortisol, a significant main effect of time was identified, with a peak in cortisol level in the final sample (SR4) as compared to post “rest1” sample [F(3,159) = 2.66, p < 0.05; 54 participants with sufficient saliva samples were included in this analysis]; Tukey’s HSD post-hoc analyses revealed a marginally significant peak in cortisol level in the final sample (SR4) as compared to post “rest 1” sample (SR1, p = 0.08).

We identified a marginally significant association between lesions located at brain level A and ruffling observed over 90dpi (ANOVA; p = 0.08 overall; CC027, p = 0.06).

S1 A ) as well as medication-induced change in MDS-UPDRS score (i.e., PD-ON UPDRS – PD-OFF UPDRS ) in a marginally significant manner ( r = −0.34, P = 0.08, Pearson ’s correlation); this relationship was significant after removal of one outlier, defined by 3 SDs of group mean, ( r = −0.45, P = 0.01, Pearson ’s correlation, SI Appendix , Fig.

Quantitative SWI measurements for hemorrhagic volumes, as shown in Fig 1C , demonstrated that the BMSC treated T2DM rats only exhibited marginally significant (p<0.08) smaller hemorrhagic volumes than the control T2DM rats at 5w after stroke.

Analyses of the contrasts of physically different saturation levels (LS versus HS) did not yield any significant regions associated with D 2 BP ND values of any subdivisions of striatum, but the D 2 BP ND value of left executive striatum in the objective faded condition (LS) versus the objective vivid condition (HS) contrast correlated with the left parietal cortex (left inferior parietal lobule (BA 40)) at a marginally significant level (cluster level of p = 0.08, FDR corrected), which overlapped with the left parietal cortex found in subjective faded condition (overlapped region was presented in Supplementary Fig.

(2012) further reported that the correlation between the number of years of musical training received and auditory working memory ability was “marginally significant” ( r = 0.38, p = 0.08), strongly implying that musical training was causally responsible for the measured between-group difference.

There was a significant difference in sessile polychaete biomass among treatments (One-way ANOVA, p = 0.03), and post-hoc tests revealed a significant difference between the low-density aquaculture and natural treatments (Tukey’s post-hoc test, p = 0.03), a marginally significant difference between high-density aquaculture and natural (p = 0.08), and no difference between low- and high- density aquaculture (p = 0.89; Table 1 ; Fig 3B ).

The analysis revealed a marginally significant main effect of the condition contrast, β = .19, p = .080, qualified by a significant interaction with PNS, β = –.28, p = .036.

Moreover, we have found a marginally significant timepoint (heart rate before the film vs heart rate after the film) x film group (trauma vs control) interaction effect, F 1,64 = 3.12, p = 0.08.