“marginally significant”

neutral) stimuli, in both visual and olfactory modalities, decreased d’ and thus impeded discrimination between healthy and unhealthy food [ t (15) = −3.16, p < 0.01; disgust d’ = 1.91 (0.78); neutral d’ = 2.11 (0.62)] whereas an opposite, marginally significant trend emerged for the social stimuli: social disgust (vs. neutral) stimuli increased d’ [ t (15) = 1.89, p = 0.08; disgust d’ = 2.11 (0.72); neutral d’ = 1.98 (0.77)] and thus improved food healthiness discrimination.

In fact, there was a marginally significant interaction ( p = 0.080) between closeness and the group/personal discrepancy in the prediction of national identification that was negative rather than positive.

55 years, p = 0.02), and a marginally significant higher percentage were undergoing dialysis before their most current admission that led to VAP (22% vs. 10%, p = 0.08).

In this school-level OLS regression model ( N = 20), the interaction term was marginally significant (B = −0.08, p = 0.08).

There was a marginally significant ( p = 0.08) effect between subgroup and nirsevimab concentration, when evaluated using an ANOVA, with a significant difference observed at 13.6 μg /mL nirsevimab ( p = 0.007) (Supplementary Fig. 5 ).

When the hypothesized three-way interaction was included in the third step, this changed the model in a marginal significant way, Δ F (1,343) = 3.07, p = 0.08, R 2 = 0.09, Δ R 2 = 0.01, and the Moral Argumentation × Prior behavior × Moral Identity interaction was marginally significant ( B = 0.21, p = 0.08).

There was no significant association between Heartbeat Perception Task score and state anxiety ( r = 0.17, p = 0.31), but a marginally significant correlation was found between the heartbeat perception score and the level of trait anxiety ( r = 0.28, p = 0.08).

Exploratory Analysis Results : Further analysis revealed gender-specific effects: Male Participants: A marginally significant decrease in creative self-efficacy post-AI integration was found (t = 1.74, p = 0.08, d = 0.08), with a CI of -0.10 to 0.27.

After exclusion of ambiguous responses, analysis of reaction times revealed only a marginally significant main effect of Goal, F (1,15) = 3.5, P = 0.08, indicating a trend towards slower responses to pictures representing objects at incorrect compared to correct goals (effect-size Goal = 26 ms; Fig. 3 ).

This effect was marginally significant (χ 2 = 3.2, df = 1, p < 0.08).

Condition was marginally significant, F (1, 15) = 3.63, p = 0.08, η 2 = 0.009, and the interaction between contrast and condition was not statistically significant, F (4, 60) = 0.84, p = 0.51, η 2 = 0.005.

The findings were similar for high-risk HPV infection, but the interaction was marginally significant (P = 0.08).

The former time period, 1979-81, was chosen as a result of earlier work using Trent Cancer Registry data that had shown marginally significant differences (P=0.08) in crude survival between districts for women diagnosed in this period.

Compared with the low-risk class, age had no significant effects on the likelihood of being in a particular cluster; while gender (female) had a marginally significant effect on predicting the membership of the moderate-risk class ( OR = 1.407, p = 0.080) and a significant effect on predicting the membership of the high-risk class ( OR = 2.485, p = 0.080).

42m-post-stress) repeated measures ANOVA on salivary cortisol levels revealed a marginally significant main effect of stress, F ( 1,26 ) = 3.326, p = .080, η p 2 = .113, a significant main effect of time, F ( 2,52 ) = 5.757, p < .01, η p 2 = .181, and a significant stress × time interaction showing that CPT exposure increased cortisol levels, whereas warm water exposure did not, F ( 2,52 ) = 10.040, p < .001, η p 2 = .279; see Fig. 2 .

Grade effect: For the overt victimization, univariate ANOVA indicated that the main effect of grade was marginally significant (F (1,1040) = 2.27, p = 0.08, η p 2 = 0.007).

Post hoc analyses indicated that laypersons (mean 1.50, SD 0.71) reported significantly lower knowledge than students (mean 3.50, SD 0.71; P =.04) and psychotherapists (mean 5.00, SD 0; P =.01), with the last 2 groups having a marginally significant difference from each other ( P =.08).

We also observed marginally significant positive main effects of time ( β = 0.001, 95% CI [−0.000, 0.002], t (93) = 1.773, p =.080) and significant effects of period ( β = 0.168, 95% CI [0.055, 0.281], t (93) = 2.945, p =.004).

However, the univariate Blomberg's K tests seemed to lack power ( K = 0.99, p = .139; K = 0.76, p = .895 for the first two niche PCoA‐based niche distance axes, Figure 4 ) and when testing each environmental variable in turn, only monthly mean precipitation showed a marginally significant signal (Blomberg's K test: K = 0.87, p = .08; Table S2 ). 3.3.

There was also a marginally significant negative correlation between behavioral MW state and mixed state ( r = −0.41, p = 0.08).

In GA, the Mantel r values between site distance and site dissimilarity were marginally significant for species and functional groups (Randomization tests: P = 0.08 and 0.06, respectively), and significant for taxonomic groups (Randomization tests: P = 0.04).

In patients with isoflavone intake higher than median level, there was a marginally significant lower number of all-cause hospitalizations as compared to those patients with isoflavone intake lower than median level (p=0.08).

This attenuation was marginally significant ( P = 0.08).

Exceptions included (see Supplemental Table): depression, panic disorder, and phobias were more likely among adolescents than children, while SUDs were more likely for adolescents; generalized anxiety disorder and eating disorders were more likely among girls than boys; and children not living with both birth parents were more likely to have probable diagnoses of depression, ADHD, and CD (a similar pattern was marginally significant, p < .08, for separation anxiety disorder, phobias, and ODD). 3.2.

Effect size of verbal memory (5-minute recall in AVLT) was marginally significant in favor of the training group (p = .080, range from 0.07 to 0.73 SD) ( Table 2 ).