“marginally significant”

The correlation with phonological distance remained marginally significant even when controlling for both genealogy and geography (p = 0.08).

After controlling for Trait Anxiety, the correlation between ΔANI and Bell 1 was marginally significant for the entire group ( r = .32, p = .08), and significant for the group that failed to solve the puzzle ( r = .59, p < .05).

However, monitor position demonstrated a marginally significant relationship with neck, shoulder and back discomfort ( P = 0.08, 0.09, and 0.08, respectively).

In addition, analysis of the secondary outcome measure of response rate revealed a marginally significant differences between the Real and Sham groups (40.0% vs 7.1% improvement; p = 0.08), but not between Real and AC groups (40.0% vs 21.4% improvement; p = 0.43; Fig. 2 A).

ANOVAs performed for each odor revealed a marginally significant increase in pleasantness for leather [ F (1,39) = 3.22, p = 0.08] and significant increases in pleasantness for the blank pen, lilac, and shampoo odors [ F s (1,39) = 25.45, 7.2, 5.47; p s < 0.001, 0.01, 0.05; η 2 s = 0.39, 0.15, 0.12, respectively; see Figure 1A ].

Postintervention state test anxiety was positively marginally significant to intervention exam z-score (estimate = 0.17, p = 0.08).

Households earning 70,000–90,000 CNY show a similar trend with a marginally significant coefficient ( p = 0.08), reinforcing the link between income flexibility and residential choices that may prioritise urban locations.

There was a marginally significant interaction between Zn intake and urinary Cd ( p -value = 0.08), so we analyzed associations within Zn intake subgroups.

Females presented the greatest reduction (g = −1.16 [−1.74 to −0.58]), followed by males (g = −0.29 [−0.53 to −0.05]); the mixed-sex subgroup presented a marginally significant effect ( p = 0.08).

This difference is an increase from both NSFG 2015–2017 (marginally significant at p = 0.08) and NSFG 2011–2013 (significant, p < 0.05).

When the personal income per US state and Gini index were controlled, the negative association remained marginally significant (worldwide: r (41) = -.270, p = .080; US: r (46) = -.281, p = .053).

The A R values of the Yaeyama Islands were significantly higher than that of the Volcano Islands (pairwise t-test, p < 0.01, Fig 5A ), and those of the Yaeyama and Daito, and Bonin and Volcano Islands were marginally significant (pairwise t-test, p = 0.08, 0.07, respectively).

Additionally, the averaged five cortical thicknesses in the CFS group showed a marginally significant correlation with the CFS duration (Spearman R = −0.28, p = 0.08). 4.

About DFS, high-risk histology, more than one-half myometrial invasion, and stage III/IV were independent prognostic factors, but 20 or more PLNs resection was associated with better DFS with marginally significant difference (HR=0.57; 95% CI=0.31–1.07; p=0.080) ( Table 2 ). 2.

Tumor grade was marginally significant ( P value = 0.08). 4.2.

a marginally significant (p < 0.08) increase in 8-oxodG as weight increased (data not shown), but not BMI; 2. among the mothers older than the oldest daughter (age 51.6), a. the significance levels of aMT6s/CR fell to 0.009 and 0.008 for 8-oxodG with BMI or weight in the model, respectively; b.

To ascertain that these lesion effects were task-specific (task: spatial-variant/temporal-variant), we ran three separate mixed-design, repeated-measures ANOVAs considering only the CON and sdlPFC groups with group as a between-subjects variable and task as a within-subjects variable and confirmed a marginally significant task × group interaction on SDT meta-d′/d′ ( F (1,7) = 4.194, p = 0.080) and on hierarchical-model meta-d′/d′ ( F (1,7) = 4.599, p = 0.069), as well as a slightly weaker effect on φ ( F (1,7) = 1.939, p = 0.206).

There was a marginally significant interaction among process, time, and context ( F (6,144) = 1.87, P = 0.08, η 2 = 0.07).

subterraneus workers in the nest without fungus revealed a significant difference between the two castes: large workers engaged in more “social behaviors” than small workers, although this difference was marginally significant (U = 56; p < 0.08).

non-predictive) and Epoch (1–5) on performance correct yielded a marginally significant main effect of Epoch, F (4, 44) = 2.25, p = .08, η p 2 = .17 (with a marginal linear increase in accuracy with Epoch: 91, 93, 93, 93, 95% for Epochs 1 to 5, F (1, 11) = 4.04, p = .07, η p 2 = .27).

Repeating the analysis for nucleotide sequences we find marginally significant differences (p < 0.08; sign test).

A marginally significant interaction between tDCS stimulation and group showed that patients tended to respond more strongly to stimulation than controls [ F (2,36) = 2.71, p = 0.08] ( Figure 3A ).

Neither soil sterilization nor soil training affected germination time, but there was a marginally significant region*soil training interaction ( F 3,20 = 2.59, p = 0.08); Centaurea grown in Argentinean soils trained by conspecifics germinated later than in soils trained by grasses, while Centaurea grown in Eurasian soils trained by conspecifics germinated earlier than in soils trained by grasses ( Figure 1 ).

ANOVAs with the two conditions (snooze and no-snooze) crossed with the sessions (4 levels: pre-sleep, session 1, session 2, session 3) indicated neither the main effect of the condition ( F (1, 9) = 3.39, p = 0.15, η p 2 = 0.22) nor session ( F (3, 27) = 0.87, p = 0.47, η p 2 = 0.09; W (Mauchly’s sphericity test) = 0.327, p = 0.13) on auditory reaction times, whereas the interaction between condition and session was marginally significant ( F (3, 27) = 2.57, p = 0.08, η p 2 = 0.22; W = 0.611, p = 0.58).

While no significant between-group difference was found in “Effectiveness” ( P = 0.688), the patients in the BEAR group showed significantly greater scores than those in the IBT group in “Enjoyment” ( P = 0.020) and a marginally significant difference in “Adherence” ( P = 0.080).