A marginally significant emotion × drug interaction ( F (2, 126.64) = 2.5438, p = 0.08) pointed to a more pronounced ZM activation for AngryToHappy trials (Fig. 1 , left), and ZM deactivation for HappyToAngry trials (Fig. 1 , right), in the placebo condition, especially compared to the amisulpride group.
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
However, monitor position demonstrated a marginally significant relationship with neck, shoulder and back discomfort ( P = 0.08, 0.09, and 0.08, respectively).
They also reported that in participants who completed more than 9 MET hours per week of PA relative to those who completed 0-9 MET hours per week of PA, there was a marginally significant increase in Progression Free Survival (HR = 0.83, 95% CI, 0.79-1.02; P = .08) and overall survival (HR = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.65-1.02; P = .07). 11 At 3 months follow-up ( N = 40), self-reported PA minutes/week increased ( P = .04) and anxiety was reduced ( P = .02).
A marginally significant interaction effect was observed in ROI4 ( F (1,117) = 3.126, p = 0.080, ηp 2 = 0.026).
At baseline, MVPA exhibited a positive correlation with CRF (β = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.23~0.58, p < 0.001) and FGDS (β = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.06~0.25, p = 0.002), and a marginally significant association with GDR score (β = 0.11, 95% CI: −0.01~0.23, p = 0.080) in the unadjusted model (Model 1).
Model 5a showed that for rural-to-urban migrants, having more local friends were associated with higher frequency of drinking (b = 0.58, 95% [0.10, 1.06]; p < 0.05); this association remained marginally significant even when trans-local ties were included (Model 5b: b = 0.47, 95% CI = [−0.06, 0.99]; p = 0.08).
Follow-up analyses for each time-bin indicated that the Group effect was significant for the first and second time-bin ( F (2,28) = 15.6, 6.9, p s < .01), marginally significant for the third time-bin ( F (2,28) = 2.8, p = .08), and non-significant for the last two time-bins ( p s > .1).
This resulted in a marginally significant interaction between Group and Target Eccentricity (F(1,18) = 3.3, p<0.08; see Fig. 1c ).
45%, p < 0.08, marginally significant) and chlamydia (72% vs. 45%, p < 0.09, marginally significant), being tested for a higher number of STIs (mean 3.75 vs. 3.04, p < 0.05), and offered triple anatomical site STI testing (54% vs. 18%, p < 0.001).
Following the mixed modeling approach, the linear effect of the MVPA time was found to be positive and marginally significant (+0.60 minutes per day, P =.08), even after entering the covariates, namely the OS of the smartphones, age, gender, and psychological distress at baseline.
There was a marginally significant main effect of the preceding trial type [ F (1, 17) = 3.45, p = .08, η 2 = .03], a significant main effect of the FA type [ F (1, 17) = 15.00, p = .001, η 2 = .10], and a significant interaction between two factors [ F (1, 17) = 24.359, p < .001, η 2 = .20].
Adding the three feeding style predictors in the final block led to a significant increase in prediction ( p < .05) that appeared to be largely due to the indulgent feeding style (although this predictor was marginally significant, p = .08).
The association between the self-control levels of husbands and wives was marginally significant, r = −.06, p = .08.
Post-hoc analysis identified a marginally significant reduction in negative PANAS score over time in the MBSR group, specifically between session 2 and session 6 ( β = −5.42, SE = 1.93, p = .08; Supplementary Fig.
The final model of PLSPM analysis showed that bottom-water oxygen had a strong positive effect on bioturbation ( P < 0.001), metazoan diversity ( P < 0.001), faunal respiration ( P < 0.001), and microbial aerobic respiration ( P < 0.001) and a negative direct effect on organic matter accumulation (C org , chlorophyll a, and THAA; marginally significant P = 0.08) and microbial anaerobic respiration ( P < 0.01).
Globulin was marginally significant with NEWS-2 in correlation (r=-0.221, p=0.08), but not when controlling for age and sex (B=-0.145,P=0.292) and did not correlate with CCI, C10YES, or LOS (r=0.098, p=0.453;r=-0.95, p=0.466; r=-0.162, p=0.215).
The analysis revealed a marginally significant main effect of the condition contrast, β = .19, p = .080, qualified by a significant interaction with PNS, β = –.28, p = .036.
For the alpha frequency band, this test revealed a marginally significant negative cluster 2–2.5 s after sentence onset (max sum = -288.07, p < 0.08).
This model also had an excellent fit to the data, and the Chi Square difference test showed a marginally significant difference between this model and the previous model with unconstrained structural coefficients, χ 2 (6) = 11.22, p = .08.
There was also a marginally significant negative correlation between behavioral MW state and mixed state ( r = −0.41, p = 0.08).
Visual Search Task Independent-samples t -test (one-tail) on RTs slope (RTs difference between 12 and 2 set-size in msec) reduction between AVG and NAVG group was marginally significant ( t (12) = 1.47, p = 0.08; mean AVG slope improvement between T1 and T2 = 80 msec SD = 143 vs. mean NAVG slope improvement between T1 and T2 = −33 msec SD = 140).
Regarding the ejection fraction in model 3, the increase of one point in the adherence questionnaire was associated with an increase of 0.04%, but was marginally significant ( p = 0.08) [ 33 ]. 3.5.
Additionally, marginally significant associations with maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein levels were observed in both full-term (β = –0.02, 95% CI: –0.05 to 0.01; P = 0.08) and preterm infants (β = –0.12, 95% CI: –0.23 to 0.01; P = 0.05).
Bonferonni-corrected comparisons between saccade amplitudes across experiment at each level of saccade direction axis and stimulus type revealed only a few marginally significant differences between amplitudes across experiments (all t < 2.19, p > 0.08).
According to results of the multiple regression analysis (AIC = 2936.678, f 2 = 0.130, power (1- β ) = 0.186; see Table S2 ), the main effect of reward was marginally significant ( β = −13.346, SE = 7.430, 95% CI = −27.861–1.157, p = 0.080), suggesting that reward CERT in the reward-present conditions were marginally shorter than in the reward-absent conditions.