Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0791.6× alphagold
Among men in the intervention arm, the HIV seroconversion hazard rate was 21% lower with 0 network females (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.55, 1.14), which was non-significant ( p = 0.213); 37% lower with 1 network female (HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.42, 0.92), which was significant ( p = 0.018); and 51% lower with 2 network females (HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.22, 1.09), which was marginally significant ( p = 0.079).
marginally significantP = 0.0791.6× alphagold
(5) This change in BR resulted in a marginally significant decline in bacterial growth efficiency (BGE) along the DOC gradient (r 2 = 0.30, F 1,10 = 3.94, P = 0.079, Fig. 8c ): (6) Discussion In this study, we evaluated a commercially available source of humic substances (Super Hume) for studying the effects of terrestrial DOC on the chemistry, physics, and biology of aquatic ecosystems.
marginally significantp = 0.0791.6× alphagold
Second, we expected this difference to be larger in male than female observers and therefore we compared the difference between threatening minus neutral male body expressions between male and female observers which yielded a marginally significant difference ( t (24) = 1.454, p = 0.079, one-tailed).
marginally significantp = 0.0791.6× alphagold
In exploratory analyses following five additional booster sessions, a trend-level effect was observed in the Reasoning and Problem Solving domain (Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 5 ), with a marginally significant group-by-time interaction (F = 2.817, df = 2,30, p = 0.079; η2 = 0.19), suggesting a possible effect of active tACS on higher-order cognitive functioning.
marginally significantp < 0.0791.6× alphagold
Specific preparation also had significant effects on antisaccade accuracy ( F (2,53) = 12.882, p < 0.001) with a spatial preparation benefit of 4.5% for young adults ( F = 10.289, p < 0.005) and a marginally significant benefit of 2.5% for healthy elderly ( F = 3.518, p < 0.079) and a benefit of 3.9% for PD patients ( F = 3.330, p < 0.085), although no significant differences between groups were indicated ( F (2,53) = 0.541, p < 0.586, see Figure 4 B).
marginally significantp = 0.0791.6× alphagold
For the fixed effect, LMM results showed that the model with the three-way interaction between congruency, group, and the success scores was preferred over the model without this effect, indicating that this significant three-way interaction was marginally significant (see Table 3 ), χ 2 (1) = 3.072, and p = 0.079, 95% CI = [−0.0005, 0.00002].