“marginally significant”

Among men in the intervention arm, the HIV seroconversion hazard rate was 21% lower with 0 network females (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.55, 1.14), which was non-significant ( p = 0.213); 37% lower with 1 network female (HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.42, 0.92), which was significant ( p = 0.018); and 51% lower with 2 network females (HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.22, 1.09), which was marginally significant ( p = 0.079).

The moderated mediation model results for Time 1 showed that the interaction between N170 amplitude and age on reading was marginally significant (β = –0.01, p = .079, 95 % CI [–0.03, 0.01]), with significant direct effects at ages 10.6 (b = 0.291, p = .005, 95 % CI [0.090, 0.492]) and 12.1 (b = 0.310, p = .040, 95 % CI [0.090, 0.492]) but not at 8.6 years ( p = .112).

Notably, AUC for this classifier was significant (0.66, p = 0.019; Figure 4C and Table 2 , bold font), while accuracy was marginally significant (0.66, p = 0.079; Figure 4E and Table 2 ).

The multivariate main effect of study was significant, F (3, 471) = 6.57, p < .001, η p 2 = .04, and the effect of response marginally significant, F (3, 471) = 2.28, p = .079, η p 2 = .01.

The overall genotype × laying stage interaction was marginally significant ( R 2 = 0.065, p = 0.079), indicating stage‐dependent trends in genotype‐related variation (Table 6 ).

On multivariable Cox-proportional hazard models, emergency surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 2.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12 to 7.00; p=0.027) was the only significant and independent predictor of the major adverse outcomes (death and valve-related complications) while the baseline hemoglobin level was a marginally significant factor associated with the adverse outcomes (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.03 by 1 g/dL increment; p=0.079).

The combination of composites and legumes showed negative PSFs with marginally significant effect (95% CI −0.55 to −0.03, p = 0.079) while grasses and legumes combinations showed neutral effect (95% CI −0.20 to −0.26, p = 0.81).

Males had increased odds of 2.2636 (95%CI: 0.91 to 5.64) of having hearing loss, which was marginally significant ( p -value = 0.079).

The differences in F2 and F3 between Stage 4 and 5 groups were statistically significant (F2, p = 0.029; F3, p = 0.008), and the difference in F1 was marginally significant ( p = 0.079).

However, there was a marginally significant effect of the cleaner addition on “preferred” clients with these clients increasing by approximately 74% relative to controls (paired t test, t = 2.11, P = 0.079).

There was marginally significant evidence that pigs provided Cr had lower average daily gain ( P = 0.079) and final bodyweight ( P = 0.056) compared to pigs not provided added Cr.

There were no differences between the urban group and the rural group in estimates of female–good AC, but a marginally significant difference in estimates of male–bad AC, ⊿χ 2 (1) =3.08, p = .079, w =.015, indicating that the two groups’ participants had equivalent levels of positive associations with females activated and that urban women had slightly less negative associations with males activated than rural participants.

The results show that the main effect of the movement was significant ( F (2.597,33.763) = 3.251, p = 0.04, η2 = 0.2), and the main effect of the feedback mechanism was marginally significant ( F (2,26) = 2.806, p = 0.079, η2 = 0.178).

Similarly, off-medication symptoms (AUC=0.62, P =0.048) significantly predicted treatment response, whereas dose adjustment was a marginally significant predictor (AUC=0.61, P =0.079).

The only exceptions were two effects that became marginally significant: the increase in negative emotional granularity from Wave 2 to Wave 3 ( B = 0.06, SE = 0.03, p = .079) and the prediction of depressive symptoms by this change ( B = −0.39, SE = 0.22, p = .078).

The main effect of group was marginally significant [ F (2,87) = 2.609, p = 0.079, η 2 = 0.057].

This interaction was marginally significant in the univariate within-subjects results, F (6,60) = 2.0 , p = 0.079, ηp 2 = 0.17.

Likewise, vegetation cover showed a marginally significant relationship with total substrate erosion ( p = 0.079, r 2 = 0.134), with total substrate erosion decreasing as vegetation cover increased (Fig. 6 b).

There was a marginally significant trend for a decreasing female bias over the six time periods in the control group (Two-tailed Fisher’s exact test: P = 0.079; Fig. 3B ), a pattern that has been noted for other parasitoids that reproduce via symbiont-mediated parthenogenesis ( 37 ).

For the non-private dining table K, we found a marginally significant effect, but the direction was opposite ( R 2 = 0.01, F (1, 250) = 3.12, β = −0.11, p = .079).

A comparison of performance in the last 50-m segment across the three tests revealed that the within-subject effect test indicated a marginally significant main effect of time, F = 3.296, p = 0.079, η 2 = 0.171.

However, when the partial Mantel tests were conducted separately for mainland and island populations, there was no significant correlation among mainland population ( P = 0.27, r = 0.07), but there was marginally significant correlation among island populations ( P = 0.079, r = 0.49) ( Supplementary Figure S3 ).

Second, the main effect of condition was marginally significant [ F (2,76) = 2.632, p = 0.079, post hoc power 0.509] ( Figure 6B ).

(5) This change in BR resulted in a marginally significant decline in bacterial growth efficiency (BGE) along the DOC gradient (r 2 = 0.30, F 1,10 = 3.94, P = 0.079, Fig. 8c ): (6) Discussion In this study, we evaluated a commercially available source of humic substances (Super Hume) for studying the effects of terrestrial DOC on the chemistry, physics, and biology of aquatic ecosystems.

The duration of stage II was not significantly affected by male identity or the interaction (p > 0.209), although there was a marginally significant effect of female species (F 1,79 = 3.17, p = 0.079).