Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.07741.5× alphagold
Noninfective aphids significantly preferred to settle on BYDV-infected wheat compared to infective aphids at the first 12-h observation point (generalized linear model; χ 2 = 3.12, p = 0.0774, marginally significant) ( Fig. 2a , Supplementary Table S1a ) and throughout the duration of the experiment (generalized linear model; χ 2 = 19.33, p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 2b , Supplementary Table S2a ).
marginally significantp = .0781.6× alphagold
Additionally, greater reductions in overall perceived stress were observed for the intervention as compared to wait-list control group (though the unstandardized beta coefficient was marginally significant, p = .078, the standardized beta coefficient was statistically significant, β = -.29, 95% CI [-0.57, -0.01], p = .041).
marginally significantP = 0.0781.6× alphagold
Additionally, the female subjects with the *15 haplotype (*1b/*15, *1a/*15, *15/*15) had a significantly increased risk for enalapril-induced cough, compared to other haplotypes (*1a/*1b, *1a/*1a, *1b/*1b) (OR = 2.00, 95%CI = 1.14–3.53, P = 0.016), while the findings in male patients were marginally significant (OR = 2.04, 95%CI = 0.92–4.56, P = 0.078).
marginally significantP = 0.0781.6× alphagold
For blueback herring, changes in mean length showed marginally significant differences among stocks ( F 3, 13 = 2.861, P = 0.078), with the Southern New England and Mid-Atlantic Stocks declining more steeply than the Northern New England and Southern Atlantic Stocks (although Tukey's HSD did not reveal any pairwise differences to be significant) ( Fig. 5 C; Fig.
marginally significantp = 0.0781.6× alphagold
The Stimulus type (T, [VT + nostim – V]) × Group (deaf, hearing) ANOVA on P100 amplitudes revealed a marginally significant main effect of Stimulus type, F (1, 18) = 3.50, p = 0.078, with larger amplitudes for [VT + nostim – V] than for unisensory tactile responses T ( M = 4.0 vs. 3.2 μV), indicating a tendency for multisensory interactions about 100 ms after stimulus presentation in both deaf and hearing participants.