The difference induced by the fertiliser treatment was marginally significant ( p = 0.077).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
At the 20–50 cm depth, climate had a marginally significant effect on phosphorus ( P = 0.077) and a very highly significant effect on silt content ( P < 0.0001).
The 3-way interaction of group × time × segment was marginally significant ( χ 2 (1) = 3.14, p = .077) and the 2-way interaction of group × segment ( χ 2 (1) = 0.86, p = .353) was non-significant for group × time ( χ 2 (1) = .67, p = .155).
For the second graders, the regression model in the first step was marginally significant, F (3, 48) = 2.43, p = 0.077.
Plate distance to joint line demonstrated a marginally significant positive association with a Good-to-Excellent Mayo score (OR = 1.31, 95% CI [0.97–1.77], p = 0.077).
Mothers who did not use iron supplements during pregnancy had marginally significant higher odds of having infants with anemia than mothers who used iron supplements during pregnancy, OR = 9.0 (95%CI:0.79–102.8, p = 0.077) ( Table 4 ).
The results of the sensitivity analysis remained marginally significant for suicide attempts (OR = 0.481, Beta = −0.730, CI: [0.203–1.051], p = 0.077) but not for suicidal ideation (OR = 0.655, Beta = −0.422, CI: [0.315–1.352], p = 0.251).
The main effect of Emotion was marginally significant ( F 1,39 = 3.289, p = 0.077, η p 2 = 0.078, BF incl = 0.399 suggesting anecdotal evidence), with a higher sensitivity for happiness than fear.
The interaction was marginally significant, b = 0.31, SE = 0.17, z = 1.77, p = .077.
This analysis shows a marginally significant effect of the interaction “naivety x depletion” (without control: coeff = −0.109, p = 0.077; with control: coeff = −0.111, p = 0.071), suggesting that the effect of ego-depletion on cooperation among naïve subjects was different from its effect on experienced subjects.
There was a marginally significant association between increasing proportion of PD-L1 expression on immune cells and intratumoral CD8+ T cell densities ( p = 0.0773).
Noninfective aphids significantly preferred to settle on BYDV-infected wheat compared to infective aphids at the first 12-h observation point (generalized linear model; χ 2 = 3.12, p = 0.0774, marginally significant) ( Fig. 2a , Supplementary Table S1a ) and throughout the duration of the experiment (generalized linear model; χ 2 = 19.33, p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 2b , Supplementary Table S2a ).
An HBsAg decline of ≥75% at Month 3 of treatment was a marginally significant factor ( p = 0.0777, Supplementary Table S1 ).
The water balloon construct demonstrated a marginally significant trend of decreased stiffness ( P = .0778; Figure 13 ) when compared to both the intact and nucleus replacement device constructs.
Additionally, greater reductions in overall perceived stress were observed for the intervention as compared to wait-list control group (though the unstandardized beta coefficient was marginally significant, p = .078, the standardized beta coefficient was statistically significant, β = -.29, 95% CI [-0.57, -0.01], p = .041).
Moreover, there was a marginally significant relationship with being connected and supported (LISD state 2; β = −0.10, SE = 0.05, p = 0.078).
In addition, satisfaction with memory was identified as a marginally significant predictor of depression ( p = 0.078) and stress ( p = 0.096).
Additionally, the female subjects with the *15 haplotype (*1b/*15, *1a/*15, *15/*15) had a significantly increased risk for enalapril-induced cough, compared to other haplotypes (*1a/*1b, *1a/*1a, *1b/*1b) (OR = 2.00, 95%CI = 1.14–3.53, P = 0.016), while the findings in male patients were marginally significant (OR = 2.04, 95%CI = 0.92–4.56, P = 0.078).
There is, however, a marginally significant difference between the treatment and control groups for storage chemical use (p-value = 0.078).
Kendall’s Tau correlations indicated marginally significant negative correlations between spatial pattern awareness level (Appendix B , question 3) and visuo-spatial NAD learning, τ(20) = -0.315, p = 0.078.
After simultaneously adding the sociodemographic variables, the resulting model was marginally significant (Model 2: F (11,526) = 1.66, p = 0.078) and produced a marginal increase in the explained variance ( ∆R 2 = 0.030, F (7) = 5.47, p = 0.087).
For blueback herring, changes in mean length showed marginally significant differences among stocks ( F 3, 13 = 2.861, P = 0.078), with the Southern New England and Mid-Atlantic Stocks declining more steeply than the Northern New England and Southern Atlantic Stocks (although Tukey's HSD did not reveal any pairwise differences to be significant) ( Fig. 5 C; Fig.
Between group comparisons indicated significant differences in terms of pain severity ( P < 0.001), MAP ( P = 0.048) and HR ( P = 0.078; marginally significant), which in case group were lower than the control group.
Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that SATB1-high group had a worse overall survival ( P =0.078, marginally significant).
The Stimulus type (T, [VT + nostim – V]) × Group (deaf, hearing) ANOVA on P100 amplitudes revealed a marginally significant main effect of Stimulus type, F (1, 18) = 3.50, p = 0.078, with larger amplitudes for [VT + nostim – V] than for unisensory tactile responses T ( M = 4.0 vs. 3.2 μV), indicating a tendency for multisensory interactions about 100 ms after stimulus presentation in both deaf and hearing participants.