“marginally significant”

Considering each AOI separately, the planned t -tests revealed a marginally significant effect for the Open posture judges ( M = 1.3, SD = 0.9) fixating fewer times at the hands than the Closed posture judges ( M = 2.2, SD = 1.6), t (30) = −1.84, p = 0.076, d s = −0.65, 95% CI (−1.36, 0.07) (square root-transformed data).

Subtype was significantly associated with tumor grade ( p = 0.0012) and positive lymph nodes ( p = 0.021), with a marginally significant association of tumor stage ( p = 0.076).

43.5%), with a marginally significant difference likely attributed to the small sample size of the study (p = 0.076).

Four (21.0%) SSM participants and 6 (26.1%) HEP participants showed less than a 2-point change from baseline. Likewise, analyzing for a change of 20% or greater at 24 weeks, differences between SSM and HEP were marginally significant (p=0.076).

There was a marginally significant main effect of age ( F (2, 158) = 2.619, p = 0.076, ηp 2 = 0.032; Fig. 2A ).

The main effect of neuroticism on the hands-on-steering-wheel time was marginally significant [ F (1,30) = 3.310, p = 0.076].

Arousal and valence were correlated ( r = 0.18, p < 0.001), but surprisingly, arousal did not correlate with any other variables ( p s > 0.248), however the association between arousal and the probability of conception was marginally significant ( r = 0.05, p = 0.076).

Other interactions with these two factors were also not significant, except the marginally significant T2 Side × Lag × Number of Distractors interaction ( F (2, 80) = 2.7, p = 0.076, η 2 = 0.06), which reflects the slightly decreased LVF advantage at Lag 5 when the number of distractors was reduced (T2 Side × Number of Distractors for Lag 5 only: F (1, 40) = 4.0, p = 0.051; LVF vs.

Notably, the unadjusted model showed a marginally significant trend toward reduced mortality risk with higher CMI ( P = .076), but this association was completely attenuated after adjustment for demographic and clinical covariates.

This result also held for the 5% FDR set of genes (62/87 genes with 16S distance, Wilcoxon difference 0.006, P =0.034) and the pattern was marginally significant for the FDR 10% genes (128/202 genes with 16S distance, Wilcoxon difference 0.0029, P =0.076).

In the treatment group there is a slight marginally significant decrease (T1 = 2.83; T2 = 1.91; p = 0.076) between the pre and post measure but then there is a significant increase in the follow-up measure (T3 = 3.00; p = 0.000).

Likewise, there was a marginally significant relationship between rural area residency (OR: 0.88; P = 0.076) and depression (OR: 0.74; P = 0.087) with short sleep duration.

The Session x Run interaction for the linear contrast was marginally significant ( F [1] , [7] = 4.31, p = 076), reflecting the steeper increase in the first two sessions compared to Sessions 3 and 4.

The LMM on the (inverse) RT revealed a non-significant main effect of Group (χ 2 (2) = 0.67, p = 0.716), a significant main effect of Location (χ 2 (2) = 17.95, p < 0.001), and a marginally significant interaction between Group and Location (χ 2 (4) = 8.46, p = 0.076).

The preliminary analyses revealed a marginally significant interaction ( p = .076) between time-window (M150 and M350) and age group (4-month-olds and 8-month-olds), and a significant interaction ( p = .036) between condition (speech and rotated speech) and sex (girls and boys).

The mentioned decrease was marginally significant in taekwondo players after dough consumption ( P = 0.076), whereas there was a non-significant difference after carbohydrate drinking periods.

We have observed a marginally significant decrease in COL15A1 and ITGB1 (p = 0.076 and 0.090, respectively), and a significant reduction in COL10A1 as PMI increased.

A three-way (group × test × set size) interaction was marginally significant, F (8, 212) = 1.814, p = .076.

A paired t -test comparing the two action effect conditions revealed a marginally significant difference between the effect and the no effect condition: two-tailed t(60) = 1.81, p = 0.076, d = 0.23 (see Fig. 2 ).

bivia was marginally significant in the raw ( p = 0.076) and adjusted ( p = 0.091) p values in more than 30% of the tested samples. 5.4.

The posterior region (LH: CHs 5, 7, 10; RH: CHs 15, 18, 20) had a significant main effect of age, F (1, 19) = 4.82, p = .041, partial η 2 = .20, and condition, F (1, 19) = 6.53, p = .004, partial η 2 = .26, and a marginally significant interaction effect between age and hemisphere, F (1, 19) = 3.51, p = .076, partial η 2 = .16 (all other p s ≥ .22).

Hypertension was shown to be a marginally significant predictor of mortality ( p = 0.076) (Table 6 in Supplementary File 1 ).

The interaction effect between PE treatments and sampling dates was marginally significant for the Shannon ( P = 0.076) and significant for the Simpson ( P = 0.036) diversity indices of fungal communities ( Table 1 ), suggesting that the effect of the precipitation manipulation of fungal communities was dependent on the level of precipitation received and on the soil temperature and plant growth stage.

Significant differences were observed among the five groups in terms of their evaluations of the morality of doctors, p = .003, and marginally significant differences were observed in terms of competence evaluations, p = .076.

For established entrepreneurs (Table 3 ), increased sleep duration exhibits a positive and marginally significant (p = 0.076) coefficient.