“marginally significant”

Only a marginally significant increase in anti-IMX313 antibody titers was observed on D74 for Group 2B vs. 2A (P = 0.03890, Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison test), while no difference was evident between the groups on D84 ( Supplementary Figure 4B ).

PCL:YV Factor 2 scores emerged as a marginally significant predictor of reduced PC2 mean amplitude ( p = 0.039) with the implementation of the Simes-Hochberg correction. 4 Discussion Psychopathy is a serious personality disorder with enormous societal cost.

We found only a marginally significant difference in Pan expected heterozygosity ( h ) between the two functional genes, NAT1 and NAT2 , after correcting for multiple testing ( P = 0.039), whereas nucleotide diversity ( π ) is significantly higher at NAT1 than at NAT2 ( P = 0. 0065).

A second study, judged “supportive” of efficacy, had a marginally significant ( p = 0.039) result on a secondary observed-cases analysis, but a nonsignificant ( p = 0.38) result on the primary efficacy analysis defined a priori.

There were marginally significant breed × beak treatment interactions for minimum all ( p = 0.039), maximum all ( p = 0.013), and maximum IP ( p = 0.025) mortality.

Serum N -glycans have significant GPs associated with the status of the NC cohort: GP21 ( P = 0.056) is marginally significant, while GP25 ( P = 0.039), GP27 ( P = 0.019), GP44 ( P = 0.035), and S1 (mono-sialylated glycans, P = 0.031) are all significant.

In addition, the treatment × age interaction was marginally significant ( χ 2 1 = 4.26, p = 0.039).

We found that there was a significant effect of a wall, forest size, and a significant wall * size interaction on seedling richness (Model: F 3,40 = 5.35, p = 0.034; wall F 1 = 7.15, p = 0.018; forest size: F 1 = 5.01, p = 0.031; wall * size, F 1 = 5.66, p = 0.022) and a marginally significant effect of wall and wall * size interation, but no effect of forest size, on seedling density (Model: F 3,40 = 3.06, p = 0.039; wall F 1 = 3.82, p = 0.058; forest size: F 1 = 2.27, p = 0.139; wall * size, F 1 = 3.99, p = 0.052).

During S-2013, however, a marginally significant difference was found between the buffer and spray sectors during the baseline (C1) circuit (0.26 vs 0.40 AA/HSE, resp.; Fig 5 , S2 Table , p = 0.039), making some statistical analyses of spray impacts conservative.

71 It was also curious that while the statistical significance of some differences of only 1% or 2% (and which favored the uncircumcised penis) were high, substantial differences (favoring the circumcised penis) were either not significant (namely, in uncircumcised men, 31% higher “ unusual sensations intensity ” of the lateral penile shaft) or marginally significant (namely, again in the uncircumcised men, 37% higher “ unusual sensations intensity ” of the dorsal shaft,” P = .039).

The interaction term between AD-PRS and rare-PRS was marginally significant ( p = 0.039, p-adjusted = 0.06), despite the rare variant PRS alone not showing a significant main effect (Supplementary Table 5 ).

Among participants with 22q11.2DS, marginally significant Bonferroni-corrected associations were found between the right UF number of streamlines and the JSS Social scale ( ρ = .260, p = .039), the right UF number of streamlines and the TEIQue Social Awareness facet ( ρ = −.224, p = .050), and the right IFOF RD and JSS Impulsive scale ( ρ = −.380, p = .006).

The OR estimated from these shared samples marginally differs from that estimated using all EAS samples ( P = 0.018), and this association showed marginally significant heterogeneity across all EAS samples ( P = 0.039).

However, as Table 3 shows, the relationship between these variables was partially mediated: in particular, there was a marginally significant indirect path passing through susceptibility (std. β = 0.009; p = 0.039), a significant, though modest, indirect path passing through severity (std. β = 0.024; p = 0.001), and a significant indirect path passing through the general attitude (std. β = 0.074; p < 0.001).

There is significant IBD across the Polar Basin (Mantel test: r = 0.2354, P < 0.0001), though genetic clustering remained marginally significant after accounting for IBD (partial Mantel test: r = 0.06391, P = 0.039).

The results indicated significant or marginally significant positive correlations between CC (delta band: r = 0.40, p = 0.039; beta band: r = 0.40, p = 0.040) and LE (delta band: r = 0.42, p = 0.031; beta band: r = 0.38, p = 0.053) of brain networks under the peer-feedback context with betweenness centrality.

Available P (AP) also showed marginally significant correlations with community composition (P = 0.039), while the other factors were all non-significant ( Fig. 4A ).

Education level showed a marginally significant association with CVD prevalence ( p = 0.039), with higher CVD rates observed among participants with lower educational attainment.

Post hoc ANCOVAs that controlled for the eFIQ unveiled significant or marginally significant differences between behavioral addicts and control subjects in the loss amounts of 10 JPY (F 1,42 = 4.55; P = .039), 100 JPY (F 1,42 = 3.41; P = .072), 10 000 JPY (F 1,42 = 3.08; P = .087), and 100 000 JPY (F 1,42 = 4.07; P = .050; Figure 2d ), suggesting that behavioral addicts tended to take more risks (make bets with a smaller amount available to win) than control subjects.

A marginally significant difference was observed across grade levels for professional identity ( F = 2.81, p = 0.039), with fourth-year students scoring slightly higher, consistent with accumulated practicum experience.

Differences in residence were marginally significant ( χ 2 = 6.471, p = 0.039), with a slightly higher proportion of urban residents in Class 3 (77.8%), while Classes 1 (61.9%) and 2 (66.2%) had relatively lower proportions.

Concerning the hypothesized moderations (H2), ethnic deprivation did not significantly interact with honesty-humility (modesty) ( b = 0.00, p = 0.600), but there was a marginally significant interaction for religious discrimination and honesty-humility (modesty) ( b = −0.01, p = 0.039).

Gender differences showed that a higher proportion of males experienced high regret (53.4%) compared to females (46.6%), with a marginally significant correlation ( P = 0.039).

There are significant and marginally significant differences in R Pi between the progeny from the immediate neighbor and intermediate neighbor treatments (paired t test, t = 3.524, p = .039) and the remote neighbor and intermediate neighbor treatments (paired t test, t = −2.534, p = .085), respectively (Table 3 ).

Parental scores showed no association with AITD or celiac disease, except a marginally significant decrease in the overall generic HRQOL ( P = 0.039) in the T1D + AITD compared to T1D group.