“marginally significant”

Seeds that were not gut‐passed and where the pulp was removed were 1.3 times more likely to germinate than control seeds (estimate = 0.292, p = 0.073, marginally significant).

The difference between the highly systematic condition and the unsystematic condition was clearly significant ( p < .001) even after controlling for reading time, whereas the difference between the highly systematic and the somewhat systematic condition was marginally significant ( p = .073).

There were significant changes in the HV ( t = 7.78; p < .001) as well as fornix FA ( t = 5.89; p < .001) and MD ( t = 4.27; p < .001) in their expected directions, the decline in ADNI-MEM scores was marginally significant ( t = 1.81; p < .073) the violin plots of these measures are shown in fig.

An independent samples t -test showed that the difference between beginners and intermediate learners from native speakers was marginally significant; beginners tended to be less native-like than intermediate learners ( t (10.041) = 2.003, p = .073).

Additionally, parenting stress showed a marginally significant negative correlation with child RSA during the parent–child interaction tasks, r (43) = −0.27, p = 0.073, but had no association with child RSA during the independently completed tasks, r (46) = −0.03, p = 0.847.

Proportion of Total Looking Time to the Area of Interest In the DLD group the GLM showed a significantly higher proportion of looks to the semantic-syntactic trials object compared to the typical trials object (β = 0.568, se = 0.202, z = 2.810, p = 0.005), and a marginally significant visual preference for the semantic condition object (β = 0.345, se = 0.192, z = 1.792, p = 0.073).

A main effect of Time was obtained [ F (5,115) = 3.47, p = .043, η p 2 = .13], which produced a marginally significant interaction with the consistency of the smile [ F (5,115) = 2.67, p = .073, η p 2 = .10] which is driven by increased activity predominantly from 2500ms onwards for consistent smiles, with a particular peak at 3000ms ( p = .070).

The association with age was marginally significant ( t = -1.83, p = .073); the mean age of participants with positive test results was 26.0 years and those with negative results was 24.2 years.

Saccadic reaction times A repeated measures ANOVA with condition (gap, overlap, baseline) as within subject factor and group (9-, 12-, and 15-year-old) as a between-subject factor revealed a main effect of group [ F (2,90) = 6.38; p < 0.01], a main effect of condition [ F (2,180) = 57.76; p < 0.0001], and a marginally significant interaction between group and condition [ F (4,180) = 2.18; p = 0.073].

The between-factor recall was marginally significant in the interaction with stimulus for US-expectancy (Stimulus x Recall: F (1, 108) = 3.27, p = 0.073, partial ƞ 2 = 0.029), and no other differences were observed (fear rating: all p values > 0.198; US-expectancy: all p values > 0.258; startle response: all p values > 0.264; SCR: all p values > 0.230). 3.2 Stress effects In the following paragraphs the effects involving the between-subjects factor treatment are reported.

Marginally significant differences were found in left PPC ( t (9) = 1.59, p = .073) and right hippocampus ( t (9) = 1.44, p = .092).

Statistical analysis revealed a marginally significant effect of Condition ( F (1,19) = 3.61, p = .073), a main effect of Region ( F (4,76) = 80.73, p <.001), and an interaction between these factors ( F (4,76) = 5.93, p = .002).

Examination of intervention effects in relative theta power revealed a marginally significant main effect of group ( F (1, 69) = 3.32, p = .073, η 2 p = .063).

A similar tendency of DBP-change and MAP-change was found for imidapril (ACEI) treatment ( Figure 2C ), in which a marginally significant difference was achieved ( P = 0.073 and 0.075, respectively).

While age and gender were not significantly associated with outcome, the only other parameter that was marginally significant in multivariate analysis was the T-category with T3 having a relative risk of 2.51 compared with T2 ( P =0.073).

Impact of the admixed status of individuals on survival time A significant interaction between sex and Structure classes ( p = 0.039) and between sex and ROA ( p = 7.7×10 −3 ), and a marginally significant interaction between sex and NewHybrids classes ( p = 0.073) was found.

We observed a similar pattern to recognition accuracy, with higher A’ on the no-sauna group (A′ = 0.903) compared to the sauna group (A′ = 0.886), although this effect was marginally significant [F(1,66) = 3.318, p = 0.073].

In contrast, among participants without MS (n = 1,880), the magnitude of the association between SIRI and MACE risk was strongest in the SIRI Q2 group, which exhibited a significant increase in MACE risk (HR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.2-2.60, P < 0.001); the associations were gradually attenuated in the higher quartiles, with marginally significant risks observed in SIRI Q3 (HR = 1.41, 95% CI: 0.97–2.06, P = 0.073) and SIRI Q4 (HR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.01–2.12, P = 0.043).

In addition, we found a significant interaction between this polygenic component and our latent index of parental psychological control, β = −0.16, 95% CI [−0.04, −0.27], p = 0.007, as well as a marginally significant interaction with our latent index of parental autonomy support, β = 0.10, 95% CI [−0.01, 0.22], p = 0.073, on change in levels of adolescent social anxiety across 3 years.

GI has a statistically significant effect, above and beyond the role of sex, on all the PYD variables ( p’ s < 0.05), and a marginally significant effect on Empathy ( p = 0.073).

Corexit 9527 caused significant increases of pleural surface tumor count ( p = 0.026), and tumor cell number ( p = 0.042) and a marginally significant increase of tumor burden ( p = 0.073) as compared with the control.

The logistic regression was marginally significant, suggesting a trend for older children to be more likely to expect others to rationally update their beliefs, β = 0.043(.024), z = 1.791, p = .073.

in suburban schools among children aged 6-18 years also reported a marginally significant reduction in serum ferritin levels among girls compared to boys (p=0.073) [ 16 ].

There were increases by a significant 1.025 μV from the first to the third round of learning ( p = .043), a significant 1.147 μV from the first to the fourth ( p = .008), a significant 1.055 μV from the second to the fourth ( p = .013), and a marginally significant .933 μV from the second to the third ( p = .073) (as it can be seen in Figure 5 ).

At the moment of the interview, CO had a significantly lower prevalence of hypertension (− 52%; p=.006), hypercholesterolemia (− 44%; p=.025) and a marginally significant lower prevalence of COPD (− 61%; p=.073) and osteoporosis (− 48%; p=.051).