“marginally significant”

There was also a marginally significant association between being obese [0.67 (0.43–1.04), P = 0.072] and lower risk for premature mortality.

With respect to the difference in number of mazes solved and number of mazes indicated as solved, participants in the low mobility condition over-reported more than those in the high mobility condition on a marginally significant level, t (107) = 1.82, p = 0.072, d = .293, 95% CI [-.037, .850].

Consistent with the finding in Taraban ( 2011 ), the Country × Belief × Level interaction was marginally significant [ F (3, 715) = 2.34, p = .072].

Also, there was a significant interaction of muscle and set in the initial and final values ( p < 0.001; ES = 0.436 and 0.319, respectively), as well as a marginally significant interaction in ΔSmO 2 ( p = 0.072; ES = 0.119).

There was a marginally significant group by time interaction effect for BDI ( P =.072).

We applied Mann-Whitney U tests to compare the number of high performance blocks for the two response buttons, and we found that the number of high performance blocks was significantly higher for the left button than for the right button in the analysis of blockSensitivity (U = 528.50, p = 0.048) and that the difference was marginally significant for the blockSpecificity (U = 545.00, p = 0.072).

Of note, conducting the same paired-samples t -tests on the imputed data of T1 (n = 115) yielded a marginally significant difference between the two valences ( t (114) = 1.47, p = .072), with the anterior LPP larger in the positive (Mean/SD = 6.35/6.87) than the negative (Mean/SD = 5.70/6.82) condition.

Specifically, greater attachment security, β = 0.30, p = 0.009, the interaction between child attachment security and parental scaffolding, β = 0.23, p = 0.048, and child age, β = 0.02, p < 0.001, predicted greater exploration in children, whereas the main effect of parental scaffolding was marginally significant, β = 0.20, p = 0.072.

There was a significant decrease in the ROS levels from 2254 ± 245 to 1457 ± 245 in the BSE group ( p = 0.013) accompanied by no change in the placebo group, demonstrating marginally significant interactions between treatment and visits (ß = −805, p = 0.072).

Effect of geographical distance on beta diversity after controlling for environmental variables The observed partial correlation coefficients of beta diversity with geographical distance (coordination) after controlling environmental heterogeneity were significant for total bryophytes ( r = .1493, p < .001), total mosses ( r = .1432, p < .001), liverworts ( r = .090, p < .02), pleurocarpous mosses ( r = .1257, p < .005), and marginally significant for acrocarpous mosses ( r = .0471, p = .072) (Table 3 ).

The more participants valued HAP over LAP (at +2SD of Participant Ideal Affect [HAP-LAP]), the less rTPJ activity occurred in response to excited versus calm recipients, although this result was marginally significant, Estimate = −0.02, SE = 0.01, t (3398) = −1.80, P = 0.072, bootstrapped ( n = 10 000) 95% CI = [−0.04, 0.00].

The association of FPC1 with AD was marginally significant in females ( P = 0.072), corresponding to lower values of E1, E2 and SHBG in cases.

Further subdivision of ribosomal protein genes revealed a significant positive correlation ( P < 0.01) for rpl genes and a marginally significant negative correlation ( P = 0.072) for rps genes (Fig. 1c ).

For this species, there was a marginally significant negative effect of heterospecific aphids on fecundity ( F 1,39 = 3.39, P = 0.072); however, fecundity was not significantly affected by watering treatment or the interaction between aphid presence and watering treatment ( Table 2 ).

fusiform gyrus; BA19/37; MNI coordinates, x = −30, y = −47, z = −11; cluster size = 310 voxels) exhibited a marginally significant decrease in GMV in the RAD group relative to the TD group ( p = .072, FWE-corrected cluster-level).

Our interaction analysis suggested that there were marginally significant interaction between days in cohort and gender on pituitary heights ( P = 0.072).

For the connective ALTHOUGH, we observed a marginally significant interaction between factors, F (1,35) = 3.44, p = 0.072, η p 2 = 0.09 such that, for alternative trials, responses were faster in the left-to-right direction than in the right-to-left direction, p = 0.025 ( M = 481 vs. 537 ms).

Testing Whether a Higher Level of IU Leads to Lower Intentions to Get Vaccinated, to Have One’s Children Vaccinated, and to Recommend the Vaccine An omnibus repeated measures ANOVA did not show a significant effect of IU on the intention to get vaccinated, F (5, 238) = 1.42, p = 0.214, but it did show a marginally significant effect of attitudes towards vaccination on the decision to get vaccinated, F (5, 238) = 2.03, p = 0.072.

The interaction between T1 resting RSA and social adversity was marginally significant for T2 internalizing ( b = -1.08, t = 1.82, p = 0.072) ( Table 4 ).

Compared with urban caregivers, those residing in towns had significantly lower preparedness (β = -0.127, P = 0.005), while the difference in preparedness between rural and urban caregivers was marginally significant (β = -0.160, P = 0.072).

We incorporated Response (lever, food cup) factor into the analysis above maintaining devaluation effect reported above and revealing a marginally significant Phase by Response interaction ( F (1,14) = 3.80, p = 0.072).

Three of the four interaction terms yield insignificant coefficients, indicating that the manipulations were overall effective regardless of the participant’s reported level of BGC (as reported by [ 35 ]), with the exception of a marginally significant interaction for the essay prime in the expenditure model (p = .072).

There was a marginally significant interaction between burn and year ( χ 2 = 3.23, df = 1, p = 0.072).

No haplotypes showed a possible ET association ( Table II ) though the C-C haplotype of rs1801131-rs1801133 showed a marginally significant association with ET ( P = 0.072).

The overall comparison of coccinellid survival indices among materials produced a marginally significant result ( F = 1.903; 11,36 df; P = 0.072), and the LSD test resolved some significant differences ( P < 0.05) among means ( Fig. 1 ).