“marginally significant”

Conception‐enhancing methods were marginally significant (aOR = 3.051, 95% CI: −0.097 to 2.328, p = 0.071).

A marginally significant three-way interaction effect of Time, Measurement Site and Condition F (2, 21) = 3.01, p = 0.071, η p 2 = 0.22 was found.

For the arousal ratings, a three-way ANOVA revealed the significant main effect of stimulus type, indicating higher arousal ratings for normal than for anti- expressions, F (1,36) = 57.41, p = 0.000, η 2 p = 0.615, and marginally significant main effect of group, F (1,36) = 3.47, p = 0.071, η 2 p = 0.088.

The main effect of feedback was marginally significant, with increased switching observed after the absence of reward compared to receiving a reward (23.1% and 21.3%), F (1, 51) = 3.39, p = 0.071, η p 2 = 0.06.

Despite most of the samples with high expression of ID4 were from patients older than 50 (73.5%), this association was marginally significant ( p = 0.071).

The main effect of the display condition was marginally significant ( H (2) = 5.294, p = 0.071).

The two main effects were also non-significant for the motor RDM ( p > 0.5 for both) but their interaction was marginally significant ( p = 0.071).

When COVID-19 stress scores were entered into the model, the gene x collection time interaction was marginally significant (p=0.071), with youth with higher stress scores reporting higher externalizing behaviors regardless of their genotype.

On microscopy, larger tumors more frequently demonstrated microvascular invasion (p=.038), and major vascular invasion, although marginally significant (p=.071).

The association between headache and seizure freedom was marginally significant ( x 2 = 3.25, p = 0.071).

We found that the gene expression data explained marginally significant proportions of the variance in nodal AR 2 values for the DBNs (39.2%, P = 0.071) (Figure 7A , right).

Poor oral hygiene showed a marginally significant association in both models (univariate OR = 1.79, p = 0.071; multivariate OR = 1.85, p = 0.060) ( Table 6 ). 4.

There was also statistical significance found for the other three biomarkers: NEU (OR = 1.032, 95% CI: 1.005-1.059, P = 0.023), NLR (OR = 1.035, 95% CI: 0.998-1.074, P = 0.071, marginally significant), and SII (OR = 1.0001, 95% CI: 1.0000-1.0003, P = 0.041).

On the other hand, the association of the CTNNB1 mutation with superficial (< 1/2) MI was marginally significant ( P = 0.071).

The rmANOVA of the frequency values showed a marginally significant effect of the interaction of group and hand [ F (4, 15) = 2.694, p = 0.071, η 2 = 0.418; Table 3 ].

In contrast, a significant line by treatment interaction was observed for number of fruits ( P = 0.019), and a marginally significant effect was detected for flowering time (days to flowering P = 0.071; PTT P = 0.072).

The interaction effect of hearing groups × moral identities was marginally significant, F (1, 35) = 3.479, p = 0.071, ηp 2 = 0.220, suggesting a large effect size (see Figure 5 ).

Each additional year of age was associated with 1.05 times increased odds of having uncontrolled hypertension, although this result was marginally significant ( p value = 0.071, 95% CI: [1.00, 1.11]).

In contrast, little out-group distrust was observed for either ethnic group in the southern part of Xinjiang (Korla), except that the d’ in differentiating between out-group faces+distrust words and out-group faces+trust words was marginally significant for the Uyghur, F (1, 428) = 3.28, p = .071.

Results of Combined rsMRI and DAT-SPECT Data Analyses In partial correlation analyses only controlling for covariates of no interest but not for shared variance between DAT striatal binding and SFC, the UPRDS I subscale showed a marginally significant correlation with SFC total regions ( r = -0.22, p = 0.071) ( Figure 3A ).

The second best model contained the marginally significant occurrence of an eagle owl breeding pair within 1.5 km of the buzzard nest ( Figure 1C , eagle owl within 1.5 km χ 2 = 3.23, p = 0.071, model weight = 0.189).

These trends were marginally significant with respect to Mrp8 expression in liver (FC = 4.13, P = 0.071), Mrp8 expression in ear skin (FC = 3.32, P = 0.036), Mrp14 expression in liver (FC = 3.64, P = 0.057) and Mrp14 expression in ear skin (FC = 2.15, P = 0.064) (one-tail two-sample t -test).

The differences in HCZ growth velocity among the three groups from baseline to 3 months were marginally significant ( p = 0.071).

In addition, a higher degree of tumor differentiation was also marginally significant (OR = 1.2, P = 0.071).

7 Using subjects’ self-placed ideology on the 11-point scale from left (0) to right (1) as predictor of their voice pitch preferences, we find a marginally significant effect for choices of male candidate voices, such that lower pitched voices are increasingly preferred the more rightwing the subject ( b = 0.076, p = .071).