“marginally significant”

Although not significant, the results did reveal a marginally significant decrease in awareness subscale scores ( p = 0.07) between baseline (T0 = 10.73) and mid-intervention (T1 = 10.43), which is in line with the expected direction in changes.

Veterans decreased in perceived structure from the military to their first civilian job ( p = 0.03) whereas civilian students non-significantly increased in their perceived structure from their education to their first post-graduation job ( p = 0.29), resulting in a marginally significant veteran status by context interaction, F (1, 178) = 3.27, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.01 (see Study 1 Supplemental Analysis in supplemental materials for full results).

Further, marginally significant amelioration in triglyceride/HDL ratio and atherogenic index of plasma (1.48 and 0.13 vs. 1.86 and 0.24 respectively) were noted ( P-value = 0.07).

For change adaptive behavior, the between-company variance was very significant, χ 2 (42) = 68.43, p = 0.006, ICC 1 = 0.04, while the between-department variance reached a marginally significant, χ 2 (65) = 82.13, p = 0.07, ICC 1 = 0.06.

The main effect of RD on visual-spatial WM was marginally significant [ F (1, 172)=3.32, p =0.07].

In addition, a marginally significant difference between cultural idioms and novel metaphors was observed ( p = .07) showing that instructive expressions were the most demanding and difficult to process for the children.

When we tried to account for sex differences in self-reports of a good childhood, the partial mediation effect was the same but marginally significant, Δ R 2 = .01, F (1, 698) = 3.35, p < .07.

Controls had higher intake of total polyphenol (marginally significant; p = 0.07), hydroxycinnamic acid (marginally significant; p = 0.05) and lignan (p = 0.01).

There was also a marginally significant interaction between stimulus type and laterality [ F (6, 114) = 2.28, P = 0.07].

This effect was marginally significant when salt was applied on the plate ( F (6383,7) = 2.14, p = 0.07) and was not significant for unsalted carrots ( F (310,7) = 1.47, p = 0.25).

Here, we find that the Intentional condition has a marginally significant difference from the Accidental condition [the chi-squared test of proportion; χ 2 (1, n = 68) = 2.89 p = 0.07], and has no significant difference between Intentional and Control conditions [the chi-squared test of proportion; χ 2 (1, n = 71) = 1.0, p = 0.32] nor between Accidental and Control conditions [the chi-squared test of proportion; χ 2 (1, n = 37) = 0.02, p = 0.88].

Age difference in CD44 expression was statistically significant in peripheral blood (P<0.0001) and spleen (P<0.01), and was marginally significant in the BM (P<0.07).

There was no significant 3‐way interaction between standardized length squared, tactic, and year, χ 2 ( df = 2, N = 1398) = 2.98, p = 0.2, but the 3‐way interaction between standardized length, tactic, and year was marginally significant, χ 2 ( df = 2, N = 1398) = 5.34, p = 0.07.

The effect of baby (81 mg) aspirin was marginally significant (OR=0.74, P<0.07) whereas acetaminophen use did not significantly influence the relative risk of lung cancer.

There was a marginally significant increase in relative humidity ( F = 3.3, P = 0.07) and reduction in air temperature ( F = 3.1, P = 0.08) under the array panels in the spring (2016), but no significant site interaction or site‐by‐panel interaction was detected.

Marginally significant, opioid users had a higher SPD for EO than non-users (p = 0.070).

Moreover, we observed a marginally significant ( p = 0.07, Mann–Whitney test) difference in the number of DRMs of NS3-specific DAAs (4–10) and multi-protein DAAs (8–16).

However, the differences were marginally significant ( P = 0.07).

There was also a marginally significant interaction in year 2017 ( β = 0·03; Z = 1·85, P = 0·07).

Bd-infection had a marginally significant effect on the community structure of the skin microbiota (PERMANOVA: F 1,23 = 1.73, P = 0.07), while the effect of CFCM treatment was non-significant both alone ( F 6,17 = 0.15, P = 0.57) and in interaction with Bd-infection ( F 3,17 = 0.35, P = 0.94).

The difference was marginally significant for the top 10 categories in name frequency ( z = −2.04, P = 0.07); for this group, the mean visual presence was 0.4 (SD = 0.32, Mdn = 0.34, IQR = 0.56) and the mean proportion of mealtimes with the name present was 0.11 (SD = 0.04, Mdn = 0.1, IQR = 0.05), In brief, the structure of the mealtime environment is one in which the visual referents for early-learned categories are persistently present, but the heard names are not.

Among males in the lowest income group, there was the marginally significant association between an increase of 100,000 KRW of equalised household income and a decrease of 1.30% of 10‐year CVD risk (95% CI: −2.67 to 0.10, P < 0.07), and weekly working hours and CVD risk were not significantly associated.

For ‘treatment’, we found a marginally significant negative association between more reflection on values and norms with seeing coercion less as treatment (b = −.11, SE = .06, p = .07).

Interaction between HbA 1c and age was marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

The Block x Group interaction was marginally significant (F (26,884) = 1.45; p = 0.07), indicating a trend for a difference among the three groups in the rate of performance improvement.