“marginally significant”

betulus experienced a marginally significant decrease ( P = 0.070) and B. papyrifera experienced a non-significant reduction ( P = 0.082).

Additionally, there was a marginally significant difference between mild personality impairment and moderate personality impairment groups in DT ( p = 0.07).

In model 2, while not statistically significant, it showed a marginally significant association ( p = 0.07).

This result holds true for three quality of life domains: the physical (estimate = .085, p = .02), the social (estimate = .191, p = .009), and the psychological domain (estimate = .075, p = .026); the effect was marginally significant for the environmental domain (estimate = .077, p = .07).

A marginally significant increase in hind/front overlap was also observed in Sema6a−/− mice ( Figure 6B ; genotype: F 2, 33 = 2.89, p = 0.07), as well as a mean decrease in front stride length (WT vs.

Next, for the analysis of the mean RTs, a comparable ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of Configuration, F (1, 19) = 3.73, p = .07, ŋ p 2 = .16: RTs were 8 ms faster in response to the Kanizsa diamond versus the Baseline configuration.

The phase relationships at other frequencies were not significant except for a marginally significant difference around 180° ( p = 0.07) at 9.38 Hz.

Low social support (MSPSS total ≤ 5) was positively associated with COPD symptoms (CAT score ≥ 10) (OR = 3.97, 95%CI:1.86–8.44; p < 0.01), fatigue (FSS ≥ 36) (OR = 2.74, 95%CI:1.31–5.74; p = 0.01), and insomnia symptoms (AIS ≥ 6) (OR = 5.17 95%CI:2.23–12.01; p < 0.01), while the association with depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥ 10) was marginally significant (OR = 3.1, 95%CI:0.93–10.36; p = 0.07).

However, the LC + L.r group displayed a higher body weight compared to the LC group, although this difference was marginally significant ( P = 0.07, Fig. 5 C).

However, we observed a marginally significant interaction between color and motion direction ( F (1, 7)=4.59, p=0.07; ΔPSE directionXcolor = –0.07, CI 95% = [–0.16 0.01]).

2 that improvement of 3-key chords was larger between Blocks 1 and 2 in the Right-hand than the 2-Hand group was marginally significant, F (1,30) = 3.54, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.11.

Women also reported to feel more Jittery after presentation of Sadness compared to Compassion excerpts, while this comparison in men was marginally significant (p = 0.07).

Consumption cost had a marginally significant effect on the number of clips [ F (1,71) = 3.36, p = 0.07]: Participants selected slightly more clips in the low-cost condition ( M = 5.59, SD = 2.84) than in the high-cost condition ( M = 4.47, SD = 2.41).

rettgeri load of flies reared on the low glucose diet ( p = 0.45) but was marginally significant when flies were reared on the high glucose diet ( p = 0.07; Fig. 5a ).

We did not observe any association in the control group for any of the 8 CpG sites, and only one probe was found to be significantly associated with Braak staging in the MCI group ( p = 0.038 at cg24503407), and another marginally significant ( p = 0.070 at cg17178900).

Participants’ performance was also significantly predicted by In-group Bias at the reference levels (β = 7.98, SE = 3.03, z = 2.64, p < 0.01) and by a marginally significant interaction of In-group Bias with Group Membership (β = −3.52, SE = 1.96, z = −1.80, p = 0.07), which suggests that participants with different strengths of In-group Bias were differently affected by speaker Group Membership.

A one-way between-groups ANOVA comparing the interference effect due to unpleasant words for the four groups was marginally significant, F (3, 51) = 2.541, P = 0.07.

Yet, the counts yielded only a marginally significant difference for n = 75 ( p = .07).

When participants were stratified by their baseline performance (median spilt on total points at baseline), we found a marginally significant Drug × Baseline Performance Group interaction (Drug × Baseline Performance Group interaction: F (1,92) = 3.20, p = 0.07; see Figure 2C and 7A).

However, the differences were marginally significant ( P = 0.07).

When we stratified the data by sex as a biological variable, we found that the association between hippocampal SGK1 ePRS and depression diagnosis was marginally significant for boys (p = 0.07), and significant for girls (*p = 0.01); while the association between SGK1 ePRS and depressive symptoms was only significant for boys (*p = 0.02; Supplementary Table 3 ).

The number of ASVs varied widely among samples ranging from 5 to 125 ASVs per sample, with a marginally significant reduction of ASV richness in smokers compared with non-smokers (mean ± SEM: 55 ± 5 vs. 34 ± 5 ASVs/sample for smokers and non-smokers, respectively; ANOVA, p = 0.07) but no difference in richness between HIV- and HIV+ (46 ± 5 vs. 44 ± 5; ANOVA, p = 0.86).

Upon removing the two participants with an accuracy of less than 70%, the main effect of predictability became marginally significant ( p = 0.070).

Specifically, while there was a significant main effect of Accent in how manipulative the Palestinian delegate was viewed ( F (2, 445) = 3.83, p = 0.02, η p 2 = 0.01), this effect was driven by a marginally significant difference in manipulativeness ratings between the Mild ( M = 3.69, SD = 1.74) and Heavy ( M = 4.24, SD = 1.80; t = 2.19, p = 0.07, d = 0.25) accent conditions with there being no significant differences in manipulativeness ratings between the Native-like (M = 3.96, SD = 1.94) and Mild ( t < 1) and Heavy accent conditions ( t = 1.30, p = 0.40, d = 0.13).

However, a difference in the prevalence of hyperadiponectinemia was marginally significant ( p = 0.07).