In addition, the identified immunomodulatory signature was significantly associated with improved overall survival in urothelial carcinoma clinical trial (log‐rank test, P = 0.004; Figure 3A ) and marginally significant in melanoma trial (log‐rank test, P = 0.07; Figure 3B ).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
We did not observe any association in the control group for any of the 8 CpG sites, and only one probe was found to be significantly associated with Braak staging in the MCI group ( p = 0.038 at cg24503407), and another marginally significant ( p = 0.070 at cg17178900).
Moreover, whereas in the combined cohort models neither number of cycles per minute (ß=−0.23, 95% CI, − 0.74 to 0.28; p =0.37) nor number of cycles per burst (ß=0.13, 95% CI, −0.03 to 0.29; p =0.12) was significantly associated with PSS total score, the negative association between PSS and cycles per minute was significant in the PROTECT sample alone (ß =−0.76, 95% CI, −1.40 to −0.12; p =0.02), and the association between PSS and number of cycles per burst was marginally significant in the IKIDS sample alone(ß =0.27, 95% CI, −0.01 to 0.55; p =0.07).
The results indicate a marginally significant effect of happiness when bargaining power is low, OR = 2.06, p = 0.07, 95% CI (0.94, 4.49), such that happy participants are 2.06 times more likely to make a request (probability of requesting increases to 40.61% when happiness increases by one unit).
The analyses on the IQ data revealed a marginally significant increase for the massage group from baseline ( M = 78.7, SD = 12.8) to final ( M = 82.6; SD = 9.6), t (22) = 1.90, P = 0.07.
ATX-A content was significantly (F-test; R 2 = −0.43, p < 0.01; Figure 4B ) negatively correlated with growth rate, while ATX-A content exhibited a positive, marginally significant (F-test; R 2 = 0.26, p < 0.07; Figure 4C ) correlation with N 2 fixation rate.
The phase relationships at other frequencies were not significant except for a marginally significant difference around 180° ( p = 0.07) at 9.38 Hz.
Under the robust specification, the effect of outcome type (FI vs CSA) remained marginally significant (Estimate = 0.37, 95% CI − 0.04 to 0.78, p = 0.07), while all other moderators showed no statistically significant associations with effect sizes (see Supplementary Table S4 ).
According to Welch Two Sample t-test, Group variable has a marginally significant effect ( t (28) = 1.87, p = .07, p adj = ns, Cohen’s d = 0.45) on tau.
The analyses showed that the CNA x condition interaction on the error score of absolute task was significant, b = 0.485, SE = 0.198, p = 0.02, [95% CI = 0.092, 0.879], β = 0.305, and that CPA × condition interaction on the error score of absolute task was marginally significant, b = 0.323, SE = 0.177, p = 0.07, [95% CI = −0.674, 0.029], β = −0.260.
There was a significant interaction between time × quality of memory ( F (2,653) = 14.324, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.021) and a marginally significant interaction between quality of memory × genotype ( F (1,653) = 2.673, p = 0.070, η 2 = 0.008).
Probing the presence of Style differences in Mandarin and English perceivers as a function of Tone, one marginally significant comparison was observed: T3 perceived by English participants ( p = 0.07; p -values >0.25 in other comparisons); their identification of Clear T3 (58.4%, SD = 0.53) was higher than Plain T3 (48.2%, SD = 0.53).
amazonensis infective juveniles displayed a marginally significant (P = 0.07, Dunnett’s Test) preference for undamaged corn seedlings versus blank controls.
Anger The ostracism manipulation produced a marginally significant effect on anger, F (2, 71) = 2.74, p< .07, η p 2 = .07.
Only following immediate post-reactivation interference, IPIs pattern generated at the very beginning of the retest session on Day3 was significantly modified by continued practice, as indicated by a significant effect of block across groups ( F (4.24,280.00) = 4.68, p = 0.001), a marginally significant block by group interaction ( F (12.73,280.00) = 1.70, p = 0.07) and a significant effect of block only in the ReactInt group in the subsequent post hoc analyses ( F (3.59,68.12) = 8.37, p < 0.001; F (3.00,42.01) = 0.50, p = 0.68; F (4.05,77.00) = 0.37, p = 0.83; F (3.32,4646) = 1.56, p = 0.21, ReactInt, React8hInt, ReactNoInt and NoReactNoInt group respectively).
The percentages of changes for each reason were not significantly different during the studied time in the IMSS ( P value = 0.97) or in the SSA ( P value = 0.13), but it was marginally significant in the INS ( P value = 0.07), where the percentage of changes for toxicity decreased after 2001 (21% versus 14.8%) and changes for optimizing increased (39.1% versus 44.4%).
There was a significant decrease in the number of patients that were hospitalized due to internalizing disorders from 2019 ( M ± SD = 22.3 ± 9.3 per month) to 2020 ( M ± SD = 16.8 ± 7.7; B = −5.5, 95% CI = −8.0 to −3.0, p = 0.0002) and a marginally significant increase in the number of restraints per month (2019: M ± SD = 2.8 ± 6.8, 2020: M ± SD = 9.0 ± 14.5; Z = −1.96, Rosenthal’s r = 0.36, p = 0.07).
Both biasing context by resolution type ( β = − 0.11, t = − 3.23, p < .01) and idiom literality by resolution type ( β = 0.10, t = 2.75, p < 0.01) were significant, and the three-way interaction of biasing context by resolution type by idiom literality was marginally significant ( β = − 0.13, t = − 1.77, p = 0.07).
The interaction between the ICD-11 dummy and social health insurance system type is positive and marginally significant for the policy frame ratio ( β = 0.05, SE = 0.03, p = 0.07), suggesting a tendency—though not conclusively established at conventional thresholds—for countries with pluralistic healthcare systems to be somewhat more responsive to WHO-level institutional signals in their policy frame coverage than NHS-type or market-oriented systems.
The difference was marginally significant for the top 10 categories in name frequency ( z = −2.04, P = 0.07); for this group, the mean visual presence was 0.4 (SD = 0.32, Mdn = 0.34, IQR = 0.56) and the mean proportion of mealtimes with the name present was 0.11 (SD = 0.04, Mdn = 0.1, IQR = 0.05), In brief, the structure of the mealtime environment is one in which the visual referents for early-learned categories are persistently present, but the heard names are not.
The difference in prevalence of distant metastases between FTC and HCC patients was marginally significant ( p = 0.07).
A marginally significant negative correlation [ r = −0.33, p = 0.07] suggested that participants with more positive attitudes toward racial outgroup members maintained constant their ability to remap touch seen on a black face; conversely, those prejudiced people whose initial somatosensory resonance was lacking, after synchronous IMS showed an increased ability to remap touch seen on an outgroup member.
The group difference was marginally significant when expressing happiness, t (38) = 1.90, p < .07.
In the ‘At risk of malnutrition’ category, chemotherapy revealed a marginally significant association (OR: 1.335; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.246–2.841; P = 0.07); xerostomia exhibited a statistically significant association (OR: 1.004; 95% CI: 0.411–2.449; P < 0.05); and a satisfactory diet was also statistically significantly associated (OR: 0.296; 95% CI: 0.076–1.150; P <0.05).
Contact with cows with diarrhoea was marginally significant ( p = 0.07) and class remained in the model as a confounder.