Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantP = 0.071.4× alphagold
A repeated measures Two-Way analysis of variances (ANOVA) with task and switch as factors revealed significant main effect of the task [ F (1, 13) = 194.3, P < 0.001], and task switch [ F (1, 13) = 28.1, P < 0.001], with a marginally significant interaction effect [ F (1, 13) = 3.64, P = 0.07].
marginally significantp = 0.0701.4× alphagold
When the not significant Incompatibility × Internal motivation, B = -0.20, SE = 0.15, p = 0.191, was entered into the model, the Incompatibility × External motivation interaction remained marginally significant, B = -0.21, SE = 0.11, p = 0.070.
marginally significantp=0.071.4× alphagold
Defined by methodology A, B, or C, higher PD-L1 group showed a better prognosis trend although the difference was marginally significant as determined by the log-rank test (p=0.07 as classified by methodology A, p=0.14 as classified by methodology B, p=0.12 as classified by methodology C, Figures 1A–C ).
marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
This interaction remained marginally significant even after the data for each region were rescaled into z scores based on parameter estimates across participants and conditions [ F (8,10) = 2.7, p = 0.07], suggesting that that this result did not arise simply from scaling differences between regions.
marginally significantP = 0.071.4× alphagold
A marginally significant association (β = 0.06 h, 95% CI: −0.004, 0.12, P = 0.07) between TSH level in the second trimester and duration of the first stage of labor was observed, while TSH level in the third trimester was found to be significantly positively associated with duration of the first stage of labor (β = 0.12 h, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.18, P < 0.001).
marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Specially, there was a significant decrease in escape latency for the 17.4 mg flavonoid supplemented group in comparison to control for session 2, 3 and 4 ( p < 0.05), whilst the lower dose of 8.7 mg flavonoid group was significantly faster at sessions 2 and 3 ( p < 0.05) and marginally significant on the last session ( p = 0.07) ( Fig. 1 a).
marginally significantP = 0.071.4× alphagold
In Table 3 , 30.3% of individuals were in low adherence of LCD group and 69.7% were in other groups and it was shown that weight (P = 0.001), height (P = 0.04), BMI (P = 0.04), BFM (P = 0.01), BFP (P = 0.03), FFM (P = 0.03), FMI (P = 0.04), WC (P = 0.03), VFA (P = 0.02), ODP (P = 0.03); were all significant and age was marginally significant (P = 0.07) with LCD status.