“marginally significant”

Results We find that comment valence has a marginally significant main effect on participants’ perception of being informed ( F 2 =2.40, P =.07); specifically, participants in the positive condition (mean 4.17, SD 0.94) felt less informed than those in the mixed condition (mean 4.50, SD 0.69, P =.09).

Of the secondary outcomes, the effect was statistically significant for anxiety (Cohen’s d, 0.41; P = .01) and marginally significant for post-traumatic stress (Cohen’s d, 0.35; P = .07) and traumatic grief (Cohen’s d, 0.26; P = .08).

There was also a marginally significant main effect of SQ F (1, 90) = 3.38, p = 0.070, with a negative coefficient (−0.00021).

The gene UNG gave a marginally significant estimation (p = 0.07, Welch’s t-test).

In none of these cases did we find a significant relationship between the number of WGCW hotspots and mutation frequency ( S2 Table ) with the possible exception of RA, where we observe a marginally significant positive correlation (r = 0.42, P = 0.07, S1 Fig ).

Although, there were no statistically significant interactions between psychological measures and sex or BMI on CRP, there was a marginally significant interaction for the categorical variable of Class II or greater obesity and anxiety on CRP ( p =0.07).

In terms of the d-FRN's statistical analysis from the other-chosen stocks, a 2 (stock owner: self, other) × 10 (electrode: F3, F4, FC1, FC2, Fz, Cz, C3, C4, CP1, and CP2) ANOVA produced a marginally significant main effect of ownership, F (1, 21) = 3.65, p = 0.07, η 2 partial = 0.148.

In Period 2, each 1 % higher adherence was associated with a 5 % increase in the odds of suppression (p = 0.006), while a smaller marginally significant increase was seen in Period 1 (p = 0.07).

When the not significant Incompatibility × Internal motivation, B = -0.20, SE = 0.15, p = 0.191, was entered into the model, the Incompatibility × External motivation interaction remained marginally significant, B = -0.21, SE = 0.11, p = 0.070.

Spring weight of male individuals varied significantly between crosses ( F 3, 334 = 18.37, p < 0.001) and habitats ( F 1, 334 = 72.14, p < 0.001) with a marginally significant interaction effect ( F 3, 334 = 2.40, p = 0.07).

Career self-efficacy expectations and academic achievement quadratic trends also demonstrated a negative and statistically marginally significant association, r = −0.09, p = 0.07.

For ‘treatment’, we found a marginally significant negative association between more reflection on values and norms with seeing coercion less as treatment (b = −.11, SE = .06, p = .07).

Age difference in CD44 expression was statistically significant in peripheral blood (P<0.0001) and spleen (P<0.01), and was marginally significant in the BM (P<0.07).

The same findings apply for ASI2 , with a greater consumption of glutamic acid, arginine, and phenylalanine sources (6.7, 17.3, and 4%, respectively) and marginally significant for isoleucine (p-value = 0.07, t -test), in the WE allelic variant compared to the WA background ( Figure 2B ).

Likewise, adding relative risk to a model with only absolute risk improved fit significantly (p<.001), whereas adding absolute risk to a model including relative risk was associated with only a marginally significant improvement in fit (p=.07).

Critically, a pronounced functional asymmetry was observed due to a stronger activation of the trained as compared with the untrained hemisphere indexed by significant Trained hemisphere x Laterality interactions for α 2 (F(1/45) = 9.3, p = 0.004) and β bands (F(1/45) = 11.05, p = 0.002), and a marginally significant interaction for α 1 (F(1/45) = 3.3, p = 0.07).

For ∂ 15 N and sex, maturity stage and location a marginally significant relationship was found (∂ 15 N: p = 0.07, r 2 = 0.31, F 10,43 = 1.92) attributed to the fact that male individuals of S . pteropus do not grow as large as females and therefore occupy lower size classes with lower ∂ 15 N values ( Fig 5A ).

Behrmann, Avidan [ 22 ] reported a marginally significant correlation ( r = .84, p = .07) between face discrimination performance and a global/local index derived from the Navon paradigm [(Local-Global Inconsistent trials)–(Local-Global Consistent trials)] in a small group of individuals ( N = 5): The greater the local bias, the poorer the performance in the face discrimination task.

One-sample t-tests against the chance level of 0% showed significant effects of stimulation relative to sham for LpIFG ( t (12) = 2.35, p = 0.037) and a marginally significant effect for RpSTG ( t (12) = 1.99, p = 0.07).

The original predicted interaction between threat of diagnosis and Internet use remained marginally significant ( B =.17, SE=0.09, P =.07).

In addition, the interaction between prime and group is marginally significant, F (1, 81) = 2.62, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.06.

versicolor , which some would classify as marginally significant ( p = .07) for the full H. versicolor dataset, was definitively not statistically significant for the resampled dataset ( p = .25; and the effect size was much smaller).

The effect of Task was significant for dynamic faces (t(16) = 2.28, p = 0.03) and marginally significant effect for static faces (t(16) = 1.89, p = 0.07).

Contrary to our expectation, our study does not demonstrate a strong partner effect of females’ depression on their husbands’ QoL, although this effect was marginally significant, with P = 0.070.

Also, a moderate, marginally significant correlation was found in the Down condition (Pearson’s r = 0.55, p = 0.07, Figure 4B ).