“marginally significant”

Moreover, the influence of paranoia on predicting opponent’s fear was marginally significant ( Supplementary Table S5 ; odds ratio=1.23, 95% CI [0.98, 1.54], p =0.069).

Nevertheless, adjusting for the other variables, the volume of ACD was not statistically significant, and the association with the time variable was marginally significant ( p = 0.069).

Moreover, offline-9 min (0.577 ± 0.123) was different from online and offline-0.75 mA and showed a marginally significant difference from sham ( p = 0.069, all other p < 0.05) (see Figure 4 ).

3 b), and we found a marginally significant positive effect on red deer BCS when individuals tested positive for antibodies of T. gondii (p = 0.069).

A marginally significant relationship remained ( r AB|C = 0.396, P = 0.069).

On the other hand, the respective error rates of nurses in the drug name similarity (−) and (+) group were 8.8% (6/68) and 20.9% (9/43), and there was a marginally significant difference in the error rates of nurses between the two groups ( P = 0.069).

The district population showed a positive but marginally significant association in the highest quartile (OR = 2.22; 95% CI, 0.94–5.27; p = 0.069).

Among religious groups, 20.7% of Orthodox women experienced verbal discouragement of family planning, compared to 13.0% of Muslim women and 14.1% of women with Protestant/Other religious affiliation; these differences were marginally significant ( p = 0.069).

In contrast, SSRI use (SSRI use, n = 10 vs no SSRI use, n = 7) was marginally significant (F (1,14) = 3.890, p = 0.069) such that participants with PTSD on SSRIs had 27% lower [ 18 F]FEPPA V T compared to participants not on SSRIs and showed no difference from HC (p = 0.837).

The analysis of first pass with no regression times revealed a marginally significant interaction between the two factors (β = 31.95, SE = 17.52, t = 1.82, p = 0.069).

When analyzed separately by domain, this effect held for risk perception in the social ( P = 0.005) and recreational ( P = 0.025) domains was marginally significant in the financial ( P = 0.069) domain and was nonsignificant but in the hypothesized direction in the health ( P = 0.12) and ethical ( P = 0.67) domains.

This challenge is likely affected by trials in which children’s visual access differed from that of their social partner (i.e., Does Not See trials) as is reflected in the marginally significant difference between Can See (M = 82.61, SD = 21.18) and Does Not See trials (M = 76.26, SD = 25.77) trials (paired-samples t-test: t (43) = 1.86, p =.069). 3.2.

Interestingly, further analysis revealed that British participants perceived their past selves as being further away than their future selves at a marginally significant level, F (1, 80) = 3.41, p = 0.069, Cohen’s d = 0.407.

Because of this difference in force error between the two tasks, the presence of an evaluative audience affected motor performance more robustly for the 10% MVC task: social condition × target force level interactions were significant for epochs 15, 14, 13, 10, and 9 ( F (1, 18) = 8.32, p = 0.010; F (1, 18) = 7.21, p = 0.015; F (1, 18) = 4.52, p = 0.048; F (1, 18) = 5.08, p = 0.037; F (1, 18) = 4.84, p = 0.041, respectively) and marginally significant for epochs 11 and 8 ( F (1, 18) = 3.73, p = 0.069; F (1, 18) = 3.67, p = 0.071, respectively).

Gender (female vs male) was also marginally significant for PFS (2-year PFS: 60.0% vs 38.5%, respectively; HR 0.62, 95%CI 0.33-1.01, P = .069), but T-stage was not significant for PFS.

Type III tests of fixed effects reported significant main effects of SI type ( F (1, 53.474) = 5.22, p = 0.026) and Group ( F (1, 23.916) = 14.079, p < 0.001) with a marginally significant interaction between the two factors ( F (1, 55.579) = 3.439, p = 0.069).

In the fourth quarter, advice giving produced a marginally significant increase in math grades ( B = 0.93, SE = 0.51, 95% CI = −0.07 to 1.94, n = 1,758, t [1,739] = 1.82, P = 0.069, d = 0.09) and a nonsignificant increase in target grades ( B = 0.70, SE = 0.53, 95% CI = −0.34 to 1.75, n = 1,691, t [1,672] = 1.32, P = 0.187, d = 0.06).

In addition, the association between establishment success and diet was marginally significant ( P = 0.069), suggesting that generalist species utilising several larval host plants expanded less than species specialising on one or a few host plants (Table 1b , Fig. 4a , Table S2 ).

In the right hemisphere ROI, there was a marginally significant main effect of group for relative delta power, F(2,55) = 2.796, p = 0.069.

The mean QL2 difference between RBAC and placebo at Visit 2 (Week 12) was also marginally significant (79.77 ± 4.81 vs. 67.86 ± 10.13, p = 0.069, Cohen’s d = 1.427).

The C/N showed marginally significant correlations with arsenic resistance ( p = 0.069) and carbon cycling genes ( p = 0.073), and significant correlation with nitrogen fixation genes ( p = 0.024).

A three-way ART-ANOVA showed that the main effect of the agent was marginally significant ( F (1, 43) = 3.47, p = 0.069, η p 2 = 0.07); however, no other differences were exhibited between the conditions.

It showed marginally significant differences in their visual outcomes ( p = 0.069) between groups with and without intravitreal dexamethasone.

Predictors in the final model for current overall functioning remained significant (baseline symptom severity) or marginally significant (age, baseline parent-reported impairment; 0.001 < p < 0.069, R 2 = 16.8 %).

In the mesic grasslands, sheep exhibited a stronger positive selection of species with higher forage indicator value compared to dry grasslands (marginally significant P = 0.069), and also selected species with greater canopy height but substantially less strongly than in the dry grasslands.