“marginally significant”

The item analyses revealed a significant effect of congruency ( F 2 (1, 26) = 11.75, η 2 p = 0.31) and a marginally significant interaction ( F 2 (1, 26) = 3.59, p = 0.069, η 2 p = 0.12), and no effect of nonword size ( F 2 (1, 26) = 0.24, p = 0.63).

Only the mean effect size for trials with 30 sessions (0.61, 95% CI: 0.10 – 1.13) became significant and the difference between subgroups of session number became marginally significant ( p = 0.069, Supplementary Table 1 ).

Finally, in the group of participants with the GG genotype, we found a marginally significant increase in DBP at the pain threshold, b = 8.03, SE = 4.42, 95%CI [−0.64, 16.70], t = 1.82, p = 0.069, while the increase at pain tolerance was significant, b = 9.68, SE = 4.42, 95%CI [1.01, 18.35], t = 2.19, p = 0.029. 3.

existential threat intergroup conflict political attitudes Israel Science Foundation 10.13039/501100003977 427/13 United States - Israel Binational Science Foundation 10.13039/100006221 2007230 The analyses indicated that Israeli in-group identification was associated with lower support of compromise [ b = -0.37, SE = 0.08, t = 4.49, p < 0.001, 95% CI for b (-0.53, -0.21)], greater perceptions of the Palestinians as homogenous [marginally significant; b = 0.15, SE = 0.08, t = 1.83, p = 0.069, 95% CI for b (-0.04, 0.27)], and less trust of the Palestinians [ b = -0.20, SE = 0.10, t = -2.02, p = 0.043, 95% CI for b (-0.40, -0.01)].

Moreover, offline-9 min (0.577 ± 0.123) was different from online and offline-0.75 mA and showed a marginally significant difference from sham ( p = 0.069, all other p < 0.05) (see Figure 4 ).

Post hoc Bonferroni‐corrected analyses showed a marginally significant improvement in regulation success following OXT in the high anxiety group (reappraisal success: PLC = 4.14 ± 0.94, OXT = 4.82 ± 0.91, p = 0.069, see Figure 2B ). 2.3 fMRI Results 2.3.1 Top‐Down Guidance of Threat‐Related Perception and Attention In order to investigate the top‐down and bottom‐up properties of the emotion regulation paradigm, we initially extracted the time courses from the clusters in the primary visual network, higher visual network, fusiform gyrus, and visuospatial attention network during stimulus presentation.

Indeed, there was a marginally significant difference in agency index between the synchronous and asynchronous conditions (χ 2 = 3.32, df = 1, n = 20, P = 0.069), if another statistical criterion was applied to the data.

When the data were corrected for multiple comparisons with Holm method, the elderly male ( p = 0.024) and elderly female ( p = 0.046) groups showed significant correlations, while the young male group showed a marginally significant correlation ( p = 0.069).

After further adjustment for cardiometabolic risk factors, these inverse associations were slightly attenuated but remained statistically significant for CVD incidence (HR, 0.92; 95% CI: 0.87–0.97; P = 0.002) and marginally significant for stroke (HR, 0.94; 95% CI: 0.88–1.00; P = 0.069).

The Cue x Time interaction was marginally significant, F (5.22, 208.65) = 2.06, p = .069, η p 2 = .05, CI 95 = [.00; .08], indicating slightly stronger threat discrimination in the second half of acquisition (see Fig. 3C ).

Results showed a marginally significant effect of Intervention ( F (1,4) = 6.11, p = 0.069) but no significant effects of Phase or Intervention × Phase.

As for the healthy controls, the increase in FSS score reached marginally significant levels (before: M = 35.056, SE = 2.438; after: M = 40.944, SE = 2.255; p = 0.069) (Cohen’s d = 0.786, 95% CI = [−0.124, 1.696]).

moraveci had higher prevalence rates in the Xapuri River, although marginally significant ( χ 2 = 3.309, p = 0.069).

cocaine choice procedure found a marginally significant effect of determination time on cocaine’s potency (F(1,8) = 4.39, p = 0.069) (Supplementary Table S4 ).

A marginally significant main effect for gaining condition (i.e., gain, neutral, and loss) was found (see Figure 2 ) F (2,26) = 2.964, MSE = 3.18, p = 0.069.

Nevertheless, adjusting for the other variables, the volume of ACD was not statistically significant, and the association with the time variable was marginally significant ( p = 0.069).

Patients with high serum miRNA-125b expression showed a marginally significant increase in OS time ( P = 0.069) (Fig. 4 B).

The I content condition showed a marginally significant increase in BATR compared to the S condition ( t (19) = −1.93, MD = −0.33, SE = 0.17, p = 0.069, d = −0.52). 3.2.

In the mesic grasslands, sheep exhibited a stronger positive selection of species with higher forage indicator value compared to dry grasslands (marginally significant P = 0.069), and also selected species with greater canopy height but substantially less strongly than in the dry grasslands.

There was a significant age effect in the left lateral/middle occipital cluster, F (2, 241) = 4.585, p = .011, q = .035, where older adults had reduced occipital effect, and a marginally significant class effect, F (1, 241) = 3.337, p = .069, q = .148, such that successful agers had greater subsequent memory effect than average agers.

At age 6, a 4 (task order) × 2 (task) repeated measures ANOVA showed a marginally significant effect of task, F (1, 140) = 3.359, p = .069, and no significant interaction, F (3, 140) = 2.074, p = .106.

We also found a correlation between pitch span and PANSS (general score) (r = -0.467, p = 0.029) and a correlation marginally significant between pitch span and theory of mind abilities (r = 0.395, p = 0.069).

Among religious groups, 20.7% of Orthodox women experienced verbal discouragement of family planning, compared to 13.0% of Muslim women and 14.1% of women with Protestant/Other religious affiliation; these differences were marginally significant ( p = 0.069).

In the model 1, BMD had positive correlations with daily intakes of calcium ( β =0.126, p=0.001), potassium ( β =0.213, p=0.005), SFA ( β =0.165, p=0.010), magnesium ( β =0.336, p=0.039), breads ( β =0.025, p=0.069: marginally significant), milk and dairy products ( β =0.039, p=0.007), and fruits ( β =0.023, p=0.038), and milk consumption at junior ( β =0.046, p=0.001) and senior ( β =0.034, p=0.009) high school, independently of log e (BMI), and time of survey.

Time Elapse From Equivalence Tests and IRAP Time between equivalence tests and IRAP had a marginally significant effect on the modulation of D-IRAP for trial type 1 [Type 1 right after : Mean = 0.72, SD = 0.35; Type 1 7 days : Mean = 0.58, SD = 0.46; t (133) = 1.83, p = 0.069], as depicted in Figure 4 .