“marginally significant”

The Wilcoxon test showed a marginally significant difference in AP before and after AR ( Table 5 ), Z = −1.83, p = 0.068, while there was no difference in SM or SE before and after AR, p > 0.05.

Biogeographic patterns of ant genomes After controlling for both spatial autocorrelation and potential phylogenetic patterns, we found a marginally significant, positive correlation between ant assembly size similarity and climate similarity (Mantel R = 0.12, p -value = 0.068).

The differences between the control up condition and the unaltered condition were also marginally significant ( p = 0.068).

In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference in any quartile category compared to the lowest intake of ω-3 fatty acids, although p for trend was marginally significant (p = 0.068).

Moreover, differences in richness of typical grassland species among treatment were recorded, even if marginally significant (F = 5.69, p = 0.068).

LDL-C had a marginally significant decreasing trend across LPL quartile groups (P = 0.068).

This difference between the two tasks was marginally significant (t(34) = 1.885, p = 0.068, η 2 = .095).

The frequency of CD82 + CD4 + T cells increased after MWA with a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.068).

When the SSPI was entered in Block 1 and SSPC was entered in Block 2 of a hierarchical logistic regression analysis, there was significant effect in Block 1 ( χ 2 (1) = 7.97, p = 0.005), explaining 8.2% of the variance (Nagelkerke), but only a marginally significant effect for Block 2 ( χ 2 (1) = 3.32, p = 0.068) explaining 11.5% of the variance (Nagelkerke).

After controlling for age and gender, the Christian × Non-4R/4R interaction remains marginally significant (coeff. = −0.036, p = 0.068).

When we looked at the number of regular responses (coded as 1) as opposed to any other response (coded as 0) as the dependent variable and filler type as the predictor variable, a generalised linear mixed effect model showed a marginally significant difference between low- and high-frequency filler types, t = 1.8250, p = 0.068, reflecting a slightly higher percentage of regular responses for the low body-N filler condition (48.1%) compared to the high body-N filler condition (45.3%).

However, this correlation became marginally significant after controlling for age and gender ( r p = -.043, p = .068).0 Optimism and event characteristics for specific life events Our previous analysis collapsed across all the rated life events to provide a broad overview of how optimists and pessimists perceive life events.

The interaction effect between electrodes and condition was marginally significant (χ 2 (2) = 4.783, p = 0.068), and the post hoc comparison suggested that the ERP responses evoked by aspect violation sentences were larger than those evoked by correct sentences at PZ (β = 2.038, SE = 1.227, z = 2.362, p = 0.017).

Differences in systemic inflammatory markers based on surgery type Surgery type accounted for marginally significant differences in post-surgical plasma IL-6 concentrations (tested using ANCOVA) ( F (2,11) = 3.47, p = 0.068, Fig. 2a ), but not TNF-α ( p = 0.38, Fig. 2b ).

In Experiment 3, filtering efficiency was negatively correlated with trait social anxiety ( r = −.39, p <.01) and marginally significant with state anxiety ( r = −.33, p = .068).

The flgH mutation (large morphotype from monoculture #4) also had reduced biofilm formation, but the difference was marginally significant ( t test, P = 0.068) ( Fig. 5 ).

The results revealed a marginally significant main effect of coordinate system, F (1, 11) = 4.09, p = 0.068, .

Post hoc comparisons revealed that first-fixation duration in the physical cueing condition was significantly shorter than that in the verbal cueing condition ( p = 0.031); the difference between the physical cueing and no cueing conditions was marginally significant ( p = 0.068), with the first-fixation duration in the no cueing condition potentially being longer than that in the physical cueing condition.

KRAS mutation status was a marginally significant factor affecting TTB (median TTB, KRAS wild-type or mutation: 29 or 25.8 months, respectively, P = 0.068).

Conversely, the ADE of sleep on Aβ42 was negative ( β = −15.88) and marginally significant ( p = 0.068).

It was found that PDOF ( p = 0.001) had a significant negative effect, impact velocity ( p = 0.055) had a marginally significant positive effect, and impact height ( p = 0.068) had a marginally significant negative effect on FE model predicted maximum principal strain.

Conversely, in the L1–L3 context, a marginally significant opposite pattern emerged ( b = −0.119, t = −1.86, p = 0.068, R 2 = 0.04), where enhanced inhibitory control was associated with faster “no” response rates.

Statistically significant association was found for failure to identify coffee (ERR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.18–1.36, p = 0.010) and marginally significant associations were found for failure to identify cinnamon (ERR = 0.33, 95% CI: −0.02–0.68, p = 0.068) and rose (ERR = 0.33, 95% CI: −0.01–0.67, p = 0.054) with death.

The result showed that ChEI users had a marginally significant slower rate of cognitive decline ( P = .068) compared with the non-ChEI users.

However, we found a marginally significant interaction between gender of participant and experimental condition on aesthetic appreciation, F = 3.35, p = 0.068, η 2 = 0.004.