“marginally significant”

A simple effects test revealed that when the space dimension was discontinuous, the effect of visual imagery vividness on verb-clustering performance was marginally significant ( p = 0.066).

Although larger cumulative stone diameter was a marginally significant factor for SIRS (p = 0.066), it was inversely related to BSI (p = 0.026).

A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA showed that the interaction effect was marginally significant for PSI ( p = 0.066) and statistically significant for both the child domain of PSI ( p = 0.049) and ECBI ( p = 0.013).

For the external early-stage (< T2) patients, although the survival difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.066), likely due to the limited sample size and low event rate, a consistent trend of risk separation was observed.

For this group, the conflict RT was marginally significant (t(13) = -2.004; p = .066) while the conflict accuracy was significant (t(13) = -2.4; p < .05).

In the post-verb region, there was a marginally significant interaction of verb and structure type ( p = 0.066), but no significant effect was observed in other eye-movement measures.

On the other hand, a positive correlation was found between NfL and age at treatment ( r = 0.59, P = .046) along with a marginally significant correlation between NfL and duration of the disease ( r = 0.55, P = .066) (Figure 2 E and 2 ).

Although survival analysis indicated no significant difference between the FOLFOX group and the 5‐FU and cisplatin group, the FOLFOX regimen was associated with a marginally significant reduction of treatment‐related death compared with the 5‐FU and cisplatin regimen (1 vs. 6; p = .066).

Gender-based analysis of normalized brain volumes revealed ( Table 2 ) a significant difference between male and female participants in total frontal volume ( p = 0.012) and a marginally significant difference in total parietal volume ( p = 0.066).

Participants showed a marginally significant increase in overall discrimination accuracy (day 1: 83.8 ± 8.0%, mean ± standard deviation; day 2: 86.8 ± 5.8%; paired t test, t (19) = 1.95, P = 0.066; Cohen’s d av = 0.43) [ 41 ] and a significant decrease in overall discrimination RTs (day 1: 696 ± 70 ms; day 2: 665 ± 72 ms; paired t test, t (19) = 3.17, P = 0.005; Cohen’s d av = 0.43).

The number of female shakes was negatively related to the probability of male courtship in the second sexual encounter (χ 2 = 4.084; p = 0.043), but the number of mounts had only a marginally significant influence (χ 2 = 3.383; p = 0.066).

Separately, none of the models using green and blue space availability ( Supplementary Material Table S3 ) showed statistically relevant direct or indirect effects on the outcomes, with the sole exception of a marginally significant increase of 36 g ( p = 0.066) in BW in children delivered by mothers with green-space availability in 300 m in the model using NO 2 concentrations as mediator ( Supplementary Material Table S4 ).

The association with overall survival in non‐smoker patients remained marginally significant in multivariate Cox proportional‐hazards regression after adjustment for age, gender, and tumor stage (n = 130, HR = 0.560 [95% CI 0.30‐1.04]; P = .066) (Table S6 ).

There was additionally a marginally significant fixed effect of CPRS conflict, F (1, 39) = 3.585, p = 0.066, showing a positive association between arousal and CPRS conflict.

A marginally significant partner effect of care partner’s self‐efficacy on patient depression was observed (β = ‐0.05, P = 0.066), but no effect of patient’s self‐efficacy on caregiver’s depression was found.

There was a marginally significant difference in Na between the AE and NE [−3.40 ± 1.03 vs. −4.03 ± 1.17, t (43) = 1.89, p = 0.066].

Perceived environmental risk demonstrated a marginally significant positive relationship (β = 0.192, p = 0.066), indicating that environmental concerns motivate compliance.

The left high-frequency average hearing threshold showed a marginally significant negative predictive effect on the total MoCA score ( β = −0.08, p = 0.066), whereas the effect of the right ear was not significant (β = −0.07, p = 0.101).

Regression results indicated that fall 2016 hybrid students had lower (marginally significant) average undergraduate GPAs than spring and fall 2015 hybrid students ( F [2, 244] = 2.75, p = 0.066).

Meanwhile, a marginally significant increase between pre- and post-tool use in the condition of searching with a cane ( p = 0.066) was found.

For Hdac6, the “age”‐dependent increase in protein levels was marginally significant ( p = 0.066, R 2 = 0.16; Figure 4B ).

An analysis of variance on interest in pursuing Mathematics and natural sciences showed a marginally significant difference between profiles, F (2, 334) = 2.74, p = 0.066, ƞ p 2 = 0.02.

Results showed that Moderate Cluster VI significantly differed from the overall distribution, χ 2 = 11.57, p < 0.003, df = 3, while Simple Cluster I and Cluster II were marginally significant, χ 2 = 7.21, p = 0.066, df = 3, and χ 2 = 7.38, p = 0.061, df = 3, respectively.

Medical professionals are less likely to have poor knowledge compared to non-medical professionals, with a marginally significant odds ratio of 0.707 (p = 0.066) (Table 4 ).

Pheophytin, an indicator of dead phytoplankton, was also highest in freshwater and lowest in emergent salt marsh, but this effect was marginally significant ( F 5 , 30 = 2.34, P = 0.066; Means ± SD: freshwater = 15.84 ± 9.79 μg/L, tidal-forested = 10.39 ± 3.40 μg/L, transitional = 8.91 ± 4.42 μg/L, emergent salt marsh = 5.00 ± 4.28 μg/L, mudflat = 11.44 ± 10.44 μg/L, eelgrass = 5.03 ± 2.85 μg/L).