“marginally significant”

Results Effects on plant biomass We found a marginally significant effect of soil on shoot fresh biomass ( F 11,96 = 1.8, p = 0.065, Fig. 1 a).

Nevertheless, the condition × group interaction on RTs was marginally significant ( p = 0.065), since older adults presented slower RTs in incongruent trials (mean RT = 929 ms, SD = 202) compared to congruent trials (mean RT = 919 ms, SD = 200), t (24) = -2.22, p < 0.05.

We checked whether this could be explained by manipulation size (β = − 0 .305 ± 0.074, t = −4.122, p < 0.001), with both effects disappearing when including the marginally significant framework × manipulation size interaction in the model ( p = 0.065).

The comparison between the BCVAs before and after 1 year among all patients revealed a marginally significant difference (P = 0.065), which may be attributed to the small sample size in our study.

In addition, the main effects were partly qualified by two marginally significant three-way interactions between hemisphere, condition and group ( F (1,49) = 3.58, p= .065, η p 2 = 0.068) and between age, condition and group ( F (1,49) = 3.00, p= .089, η p 2 = 0.058).

Sex was marginally significant in its association with exam performance, F (1, 334) = 3.55, p = 0.065, β = −0.10, 95% CI = [−0.44, 0.01], indicating that females tended to score higher on the exam than males.

Differences in daughters’ self-esteem over time were marginally significant ( p = 0.065).

Furthermore, a marginally significant time-by-group interaction was observed for physical performance, favoring the multicomponent approach (F(1, 19) = 3.83, p = 0.065, η 2 p = 0.168 [large effect]).

There was a marginally significant group difference for WASO ( F = 3.54, p = 0.065), with OSA patients spending more time awake after the onset of sleep.

The interaction between state and post-Medicaid expansion period showed that individuals in Kentucky had a reduction in mortality post-ACA (HR=0.87; 95% CI: 0.75-1.01), although this effect was marginally significant (p=0.065).

However, these differences among groups were marginally significant ( p = 0.065).

The association for time-poverty-only was attenuated and became marginally significant (AME = +2.79pp, P = .065).

Similar patterns of context dependence were observed for the accumulation efficiency, with a marginally significant three-way interaction between MBOA peak area, induction, and red clover intercrop (β = 0.332 ± 0.178, t = 1.859, p = 0.065).

scholaris experienced a marginally significant ( P = 0.065) increase in flowering but no significant change in fruiting activity as a result of the TFE ( Table 1 , Fig. 3 ).

We observed a marginally significant main effect of prime face ( p = .065).

flexible preferences) ANCOVA controlling for age, income, and previous knowledge of Rivian electric vehicles, we find a marginally significant interaction ( F (1, 284) = 3.43, p = .065).

However, there were marginally significant interactions between species richness and the presence of shrubs ( Z = 1.845, P = 0.065), as well as significant interactions between MPD and shrub ( Z = 2.180, P = 0.029), on pathogen load (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Table 3 ).

This is also verified by our findings that there were larger changes in lignin content (less final content) in MP‐polluted soils than in the unpolluted ones ( p = 0.032), and greater lignin loss for the former (53.92%) than the latter (44.31%) (marginally significant, p = 0.065; Figure 3b ).

However, in the multivariate analysis, the association became marginally significant ( p = 0.065).

However, this risk factor was marginally significant in a multivariate model ( p = 0.065).

However, the analysis of villus height of jejunum showed a marginally significant difference between two groups ( P =0.065).

While attenuation of the ASR during presentation of the CS+, relative to the CS- (i.e., CS- > CS+), was marginally significant after DC ( p = .065; d z = 0.24), this was not the case for the difference observed after TC which showed the opposite pattern ( p = .104, d z = -0.23).

testaceus ( n = 20) were marginally significant overall ( p = 0.065), but there were no significant differences among treatments.

There was a marginally significant main effect of cueing, (F(1,19) = 3.844, p = .065, , due to overall larger P1s when targets were uncued.

In contrast, the direct path from CRP to chronic fatigue became marginally significant (effect = 0.083, P = 0.065) after including the mediators, indicating that the influence of early inflammation is predominantly mediated through acute fatigue and its downstream effect on brain network integrity ( Fig. 5 D– Supplementary Table 3 ). 4 Discussion To our knowledge, we conducted the first investigation into the neurobiological mechanisms underlying the onset and progression of post-COVID fatigue within a large-scale longitudinal cohort.