“marginally significant”

This comparison was marginally significant, t(73) = 1.89, p = .061, d = 0.39.

The predicted mean change was larger than the empirical change across participants on a marginally significant level ( T (9) = −2.14, p = 0.061), despite the small sample (see Figure 3b ).

The interaction effect was marginally significant, F (1,33) = 3.76, p = 0.061.

Notably, “p53 signaling pathway” and “Bile secretion” were also enriched with marginally significant p values ( p value = 0.061 and 0.065, respectively).

Analyses revealed a marginally significant interaction between framing and political affiliation on one’s motivation to participate in the drive [ F (1, 249) = 3.55, p = 0.061].

If we excluded a single control nest with only 20% fledgling success, maternal immunization had a marginally significant effect on fledging success (GLMM, t=−1.969, P =0.061, d.f.=23).

On the univariate level, this difference was statistically significant for plan , F (1, 62) = 10.34, p < .001, η p 2 = .14, and marginally significant for pain , F (1, 62) = 3.64, p = .061, η p 2 = .06.

The relationship between family structure and academic achievement is marginally significant ( χ 2 = 5.598, df = 2, p = 0.061).

After adjusting for significant covariates (Age, BMI and time of blood draw; all p < 0.01), the GLM revealed a significant main effect of Group [ F (2, 416) = 3.041, p = 0.049, partial η 2 = 0.014] and a marginally significant interaction effect between Group and Sex [ F (2, 416) = 2.812, p = 0.061, partial η 2 = 0.013; Figure 2B ].

Having previous health education regarding DS was associated with higher a MHS (2.27 units higher); however, the relationship is marginally significant (p = 0.061).

Although obesity was more prevalent in students with negative EE for both genders, females showed a statistically significant difference (48.5% versus 11.1% in non-EE females; p < 0.001) while males students showed a marginally significant difference (66.7% versus 30.7% in non-EE males; p = 0.061) (non-tabulated).

Two post-hoc analyses showed a marginally significant trend for the repeat group to require more favorable SNRs in the second run [ t (14) = −2.033, p = 0.061], while no such trend was found for the imitate group [ t (16) = 0.946, p = 0.358].

In the Success condition, 6 year-olds’ performance was in the predicted direction but did not reach significance (61.67% chose the no-surprise student, Z = 1.347, p = .248), 7 year-olds’ performance was marginally significant (68.33%, Z = 2.043, p = .061), and 8 year-olds’ performance was significant (75%, Z = 2.88, p = .006).

Beverage type interacted with time 3 in a marginally significant fashion ( β = − 7.60, SE = 4.00, p = 0.061).

Additionally, poor cognitive performers showed a marginally significant faster decline in the age-related functional connectivity between the right middle frontal cortex and right PCC as compared to the good performers ( p = 0.061).

Number of fixations (NF) The analysis of the number of fixations (NF) revealed that the main effect of illuminance was marginally significant ( M [1] = 0.172, M [2] = 0.247, M [3] = 0.189, F (2, 25) = 3.127, p = 0.061).

The IMS scores were significantly higher in influenza samples compared to RSV samples in GSE34205 and GSE38900 (p < 0.0002) and marginally significant in GSE42026 (p = 0.061; Figures 5 A–5C).

A RM ANOVA, with drug and group as fixed factors, and reaction time as the DV, revealed a marginally significant main effect of haloperidol on reaction times (F (1,29) = 3.810, p = 0.061, η 2 p = 0.116), with slower reaction time (RT) under haloperidol ( x ̄ ( σ x ̄ ) = 1.580 (0.147)) versus placebo ( x ̄ ( σ x ̄ ) = 1.242 (0.150)).

For the first-order disparity training group, the first-order disparity threshold improvement was significantly greater than that in the zero-order disparity [ F (1, 9) = 8.650, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.490] and marginally significant than that in the second-order training [ F (1, 9) = 4.597, p = 0.061, η p 2 = 0.338].

Congruent) mixed ANOVA of the mean RTs in global diagnostic trials revealed a marginally significant interaction between Experiment, PC, and Congruency, F (1,59) = 3.64, p = .061, η 2 g = .002.

12 , 13 Although the observed associations are not significant after correction for multiple testing of SNPs selected for these replication analyses, we observed marginally significant evidence of association of SNP rs11624702 in MDGA2 (MAM domain containing glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor 2) with response in the ISPC alone ( P =0.061) and in the combined ISPC-AMPS-STAR*D meta-analysis ( P =0.029), with the minor allele being associated with lower odds of response (that is, worse clinical outcomes).

Between 2003 and 2012, the annual Bowen ratio exhibited a marginally significant decreasing trend (p = 0.061), meanwhile the effective precipitation frequency and shallow soil water content during the dry season increased significantly (p<0.001).

A t ‐test (one‐tailed, heteroscedastic variance) shows that the difference between the means is marginally significant ( P = 0.061).

Similarly, the interaction between Dyslipidemia and Social activities is marginally significant ( β = 0.15, p = 0.061), indicating a potential reinforcing effect of social engagement on health care consumption behavior among individuals with dyslipidemia (see Table 6 for details). 4.

In multivariate model 1 comprising sociodemographic factors, the association between composite SES score and T2DM was marginally significant (type 3 p=0.061).