“marginally significant”

A marginally significant trend for a main effect of polysubstance dependence on PG was also observed (β = 1.42, p = 0.061).

The Egger regression showed a marginally significant publication bias ( P = 0.061).

In addition, there was a marginally significant trend for exposure to lower temperatures to further reduce survival ( F 1,382 =3.5, P =0.061).

In Experiment 1, the modeled outcome binding effect ( M = 75.97 ms) was statistically significant ( t (17) = 3.98, p<0.001, dz = 0.94, one-tailed paired-samples t-test, BF +0 = 77.53; Figure 5h ), but showed a marginally significant reduction compared to the actual outcome binding effect ( M = 113.47 ms; t (17) = –2.01, p=0.061, dz = 0.47, two-tailed paired-samples t-test, BF 10 = 1.24).

Exploratory behavior in the novel tank test A t -test for independent means indicated a marginally significant effect of chronic unpredictable stress for the number of entries to the top zone ( t (48) = − 1.920, p = 0.061; CUS < untreated), a significant effect on the total time spent in the top zone ( t (48) = − 2.129, p = 0.038; CUS < untreated), but no significant difference in the distance traveled in the top zone ( t (48) = − 1.309, p = 0.197; Table 2 ).

Notably, “p53 signaling pathway” and “Bile secretion” were also enriched with marginally significant p values ( p value = 0.061 and 0.065, respectively).

Similarly, the interaction between Dyslipidemia and Social activities is marginally significant ( β = 0.15, p = 0.061), indicating a potential reinforcing effect of social engagement on health care consumption behavior among individuals with dyslipidemia (see Table 6 for details). 4.

Results After adjusting for age, body mass index (BMI), physical activity, total energy intake, economic status, education, supplement intake, age of starting obesity, and history of body mass loss, a marginally significant negative association was observed between the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA–IR) and the DQI–I (β: −0.015, 95% CI: −0.03, 0.000; p = 0.061).

A pair-wise comparison showed that RC ( p = 0.007) was significantly different from NB while VC was marginally significant ( p = 0.061).

3b ) and marginally significant difference in the 5th rank subject (χ 2 = 5.60, p = 0.061; Fig. 3b ).

For the main effect of treatment, a marginally significant result was found in the mPFC ( F [1, 48] = 3.68, p = .061), but not in the bilateral NAcc ( F s[1, 48] < 1, p s > .3).

Across the two offline intervals, there was a marginally significant trend for a time point effect ( F (2,52) = 2.96, P = 0.061, ɳ 2 = 0.10) but a significant effect of group ( F (1,26) = 4.80, P = 0.038, ɳ 2 = 0.16).

No significant relationship was observed between P 50 and pit membrane area (S PM : R 2 = 0.01, P = 0.80; Figure 3e ), while the relationship between P 12 and F PF was marginally significant ( R 2 = 0.47, P = 0.061; Figure 3f ).

In the univariate analysis, time between completion of hepatitis B vaccination and diagnosis and the presence of comorbidities were marginally significant predictors for an antibody response to HBV (OR = 0.87, p = 0.061, and OR = 2.77, p = 0.07, respectively) ( Table 3 ).

In individuals without diabetes, these associations were marginally significant after adjustment (all-cause mortality: HR = 1.499, 95% CI 0.982–2.288, p = 0.061; cardiovascular mortality: HR = 1.725, 95% CI 0.872–3.414, p = 0.117) (Fig. 6 , Supplementary Tables 4 and 5).

In line with this pattern, a repeated-measures ANOVA with factors for Lag (2, 8) and T2–D2 Separation (1, 2, 3, and 4) revealed a significant lag main effect, F (1, 17) = 119.4, p < .0001, partial η 2 = .875, and a marginally significant Lag × Separation interaction, F (1, 17) = 2.67, p = 0.061, partial η 2 = .136.

However, there was a marginally significant reduction ( P = .061) in the fecal butyrate concentration in the rifaximin group. 3.4.

There was a marginally significant main effect of action, F (1,23) = 3.88, p = .061, η 2 p = .14.

In multivariate model 1 comprising sociodemographic factors, the association between composite SES score and T2DM was marginally significant (type 3 p=0.061).

Serial dependence of 1-item recall The retrocued item produced a marginally significant attractive bias in the no-overlap condition ( p = 0.061, permutation test; peak-to-peak distance = 1.865°; bootstrapped 95% confidence interval = [1.114°,4.855°], Figure 2A ), and a significant attractive bias in the overlap condition ( p = 0.019, permutation test; peak-to-peak distance = 2.463°; bootstrapped 95% confidence interval = [1.580°, 3.892°], Figure 2B ).

The results were similar to those collapsing over all conditions: a marginally significant main effect of motion direction (p = 0.061) but not eccentricity (p = 0.11).

In Abd HOTAIR-OE cells, the occupancy of H3K27me3 was significantly enriched in the promoter region of SLITRK4 , and there was a marginally significant increase ( p = 0.061) in the promoter region of PITPNC1 ( Figure 5 C), suggesting that HOTAIR -associated histone modifications work together with DNA hypermethylation to constantly suppress the transcription of SLITRK4 and PITPNC1 .

In addition, switch costs were significant with uninformative precues (.03, p < .001), marginally significant with unreliable precues (.01, p = .061), but not with reliable precues (<.01, p = 1; Fig. 2 ).

Marginally significant correlations were found between n Ach and lower residualized post-task cortisol ( r = −.50, p = .061) in the negative feedback condition, and between n Ach and higher residualized post-task cortisol ( r = .54, p = .060) in the no feedback condition.

There was a marginally significant negative correlation between these two measures over the midcentral region ( r s = .335, p = .061), indicating that the reduction in reported memory intrusions was reflected in a reduction in the NSW.