“marginally significant”

The goodness of fit test returned a significant result for coral restoration experience ( p = 0.01616) and a marginally significant result for participants’ number of dives in the Bay Islands ( p = 0.06052).

The time spent in closed arms was also higher in lactating females than in nonlactating females ( p = 0.0316), which may be partially dependent on strain, especially the CAJcl substrain, as indicated by a marginally significant strain × reproductive state interaction ( F 6,154 = 2.06, p = 0.0607).

In the model for FIM total score, diagnosis type was a statistically significant predictor ( P = 0.003; Table 4 ), while the number of AT was marginally significant ( P = 0.061; Table 4 ).

Marginally significant correlations were found between n Ach and lower residualized post-task cortisol ( r = −.50, p = .061) in the negative feedback condition, and between n Ach and higher residualized post-task cortisol ( r = .54, p = .060) in the no feedback condition.

In the univariate analysis, time between completion of hepatitis B vaccination and diagnosis and the presence of comorbidities were marginally significant predictors for an antibody response to HBV (OR = 0.87, p = 0.061, and OR = 2.77, p = 0.07, respectively) ( Table 3 ).

Analyses revealed a marginally significant interaction between framing and political affiliation on one’s motivation to participate in the drive [ F (1, 249) = 3.55, p = 0.061].

However, there was a marginally significant reduction ( P = .061) in the fecal butyrate concentration in the rifaximin group. 3.4.

Considering only gender, without considering the group or experimental condition, women had lower SAP ( p < 0.001), increased HR ( p = 0.004), increased vasomotor domain score ( p = 0.034) and a marginally significant increase in secretomotor domain score ( p = 0.061) in the COMPASS-31, compared with men ( Table 5 ).

Notably, “p53 signaling pathway” and “Bile secretion” were also enriched with marginally significant p values ( p value = 0.061 and 0.065, respectively).

InterSC showed a positive association with cognitive reappraisal (β = .21, p< .001), the need to belong (β = .25, p< .001), and API (β = .154, p< .001), but was negatively related to attentional control (β = -.10, p < .05), and a marginally significant association with self-esteem (β = -.068, p = .061).

In line with this pattern, a repeated-measures ANOVA with factors for Lag (2, 8) and T2–D2 Separation (1, 2, 3, and 4) revealed a significant lag main effect, F (1, 17) = 119.4, p < .0001, partial η 2 = .875, and a marginally significant Lag × Separation interaction, F (1, 17) = 2.67, p = 0.061, partial η 2 = .136.

Exploratory behavior in the novel tank test A t -test for independent means indicated a marginally significant effect of chronic unpredictable stress for the number of entries to the top zone ( t (48) = − 1.920, p = 0.061; CUS < untreated), a significant effect on the total time spent in the top zone ( t (48) = − 2.129, p = 0.038; CUS < untreated), but no significant difference in the distance traveled in the top zone ( t (48) = − 1.309, p = 0.197; Table 2 ).

According to simple effect contrasts, students in the walkable community achieved 1.86 more minutes of MVPA than students in the less walkable community, a marginally significant difference ( p = .061).

There was a marginally significant main effect of action, F (1,23) = 3.88, p = .061, η 2 p = .14.

With this model, the variables of shelter, timepoint, shelter-by-timepoint interaction, weight, and log (LOS) were significant (at p < 0.05), with log(age) marginally significant at p = 0.061.

Once mediators were introduced in the model, the estimates were reduced and remained marginally significant (β: 0.017; 95% CI: −0.003, 0.038, p =0.061).

There were significant differences between EYA2 expression and differentiation grade ( P <0.001), as well as marginally significant differences ( P =0.061) between EYA2 expression and TNM stages when EYA2 expression was analyzed as a continuous variable ( Figure 1D ).

Thus, in the Pre-Pyrenees, there are statistically significant differences, especially in the case of the bearded vulture (average growth with wild ungulates only: −5±6%, growth in the real scenario: 4±3%, P = 0.028) and the griffon vulture (with wild ungulates only: 0.03±9%, growth in the real scenario: 10±1.6%, P = 0.039), being marginally significant in the case of the Egyptian vulture (with wild ungulates only: −2±8%, growth in the real scenario: 6±0.8%, P = 0.061).

For the main effect of treatment, a marginally significant result was found in the mPFC ( F [1, 48] = 3.68, p = .061), but not in the bilateral NAcc ( F s[1, 48] < 1, p s > .3).

The interaction effect was marginally significant, F (1,33) = 3.76, p = 0.061.

For the first-order disparity training group, the first-order disparity threshold improvement was significantly greater than that in the zero-order disparity [ F (1, 9) = 8.650, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.490] and marginally significant than that in the second-order training [ F (1, 9) = 4.597, p = 0.061, η p 2 = 0.338].

While there was no significant effect of age ( β = −0.070, p = 0.624), there was a marginally significant age × culture interaction ( β = −0.270, p = 0.061), indicating that developmental changes in context sensitivity differed across cultural contexts.

As shown in panel A, fractional areas for GILZ and Annexin A1 staining were generally similar among the groups, albeit the differential for GILZ fractional area of staining was marginally significant between the control and OLP groups ( p = 0.061).

Additionally, poor cognitive performers showed a marginally significant faster decline in the age-related functional connectivity between the right middle frontal cortex and right PCC as compared to the good performers ( p = 0.061).

For non-lead-exposed respondents, blood lead levels in male ALAD2 allele carriers demonstrated a marginally significant decrease compared with those in male ALAD1 homozygotes ( p = 0.061).