“marginally significant”

Attachment-related avoidance was a marginally significant predictor ( t (286) = 1.90, P < 0.06).

Testing for phylogenetic signal in species traits Using Blomberg's K to analyze phylogenetic signal in traits of all species in the study, we found significant ( p < .05) nonrandom signal in spectral indices corresponding to leaf mass per area (LMA) and marginally significant ( p < .06) nonrandom signal in leaf chlorophyll a using a white noise null model, suggesting some level of phylogenetic conservatism.

Manipulation check As Table 2 shows, for absolute change in mean values for the motive of kin care before and after the intervention, ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of the group assignment [ F (2, 966) = 11.274, p = 0.06].

The higher percentage of tetracycline-resistant isolates observed in down-gradient surface water samples was marginally significant ( p = 0.06) ( Table 6 ).

The difference between ES and NS was marginally significant (H = 3.57, p = 0.06).

However, the effect of illnesses per year was robust enough to give a marginally significant (p = 0.06) rank correlation before the removal of outliers.

After controlling for the tibia size, there was a marginally significant interaction effect between the infection status and the banana genotype on forewing area (GLM: LR = 3.33, p = 0.06).

For leucine and BCAA, there were significant associations with patients’ thyroid status (P ≤ 0.01) and a marginally significant interaction (P = 0.06) but not with BAT status.

In addition, the mean BCVA LogMAR of the eyes with vascular sheathing was higher and marginally significant (0.62 ± 0.38 in the FUS with vascular sheathing vs. 0.36 ± 0.23 in the FUS without vascular sheathing; P = 0.06) [ Table 3 ].

Among individuals with skin lesions, we found a significant association of CC16 with urinary As (β = −0.13, p = 0.01) and a marginally significant association of CC16 with CAI (β = −0.04, p = 0.06).

Aside from the interaction term of FoMO × condition being a marginally significant predictor of control ( p = 0.06), attachment anxiety and the interaction term of attachment anxiety × condition were not significant predictors of any fundamental need.

We also found a marginally significant interaction; F 1,581 = 3.53, p = 0.06, such that watching the video inflated people's confidence when the ‘without dying’ question was asked first.

Additionally, the frequencies of group 2 cells (CD137+ IFNγ+ CD8+ T cells) were higher in cluster 3 (G) tissues compared to cluster 2 (M) tissues (marginally significant, p = 0.06).

Results of a meta-analysis of three studies presenting triglyceride levels showed a marginally significant reduction in the intervention group, compared with the comparison group (SMD: −0.18 [95% CI: −0.37, 0.01], I 2 = 0%, p = 0.06) ( Figure 7 ).

Beyond that, the post-hoc comparison following the Games-Howell procedure revealed that the difference between assimilation and marginalization was marginally significant for anger-in ( p = 0.06).

Also, two factors, number of relapses and CRS grade, were shown to have significant relations to MRD-negative CR ( p < 0.05, Tables 2 , 3 ), while the relation between CRS grade and CR was marginally significant ( p = 0.06, Table 3 ).

This new set of analyses identified marginally significant differences ( t = 2.30, df = 5.76, two-sided p = 0.06) for PTSD between cannabis use and tobacco use, with the former having higher ORs.

The interaction between emotion and location was still marginally significant, F (2,13) = 3.141, p = 0.060.

In fact, we observed marginally significant ( p = 0.06, Student's t -test for case 1 ) and significant ( p = 0.009) preference bias in gaze for the last half second and for the half second after the decision timing, respectively.

After adjusting for age in Cox regression analysis, the association between TOP2A deletion and time to recurrence remains strongly significant (p-value = 0.002) whereas the association with survival is marginally significant (p-value = 0.06).

However, marginally significant lower levels of vitamin D were noted when two or more variables were present compared with none of the variables (23±11 vs 25±11 ng/mL; P =0.06) ( Table 3 ).

Finally, the interaction between Task and Block was also statistically significant in SDNN F (2.88, 69.05) = 3.26, p = .028, η 2 p = .12 and marginally significant in rMSSD F (2.59, 62.28) = 2.67, p = .06, η 2 p = .10.

Alternatively, when comparing patients with full intended dose of BV with those with any dose reduction of BV, the latter had better PFS rates, and this difference in PFS was marginally significant ( P value = .06; supplemental Figure 1 in the supplemental Appendix ).

The difference between the correlation coefficients was marginally significant ( z = 1.49, p = 0.06). 4.3.

However, for the accuracy measures, we found that at Time 1 there was a marginally significant effect of Genotype for the switch condition [ F (2,51) = 2.85; p < 0.06; η 2 p = 0.11].