“marginally significant”

Overall, 8 patients in group A (25%) and 6 patients in group B (8.8%) developed MDR-gram negative BSI, unveiling a marginally significant trend towards the reduction of MDR gram-negative BSI after withholding FQ prophylaxis ( p = 0.06).

In addition, we found a marginally significant interaction between price levels and payment methods (β = 0.087, p = 0.06, 95% BCI [−0.003 0.177]) such that in comparison to paying in cash, mobile payment effectively enhanced purchase intention for high-price headphones (M high_price_mobile = 53.59% vs.

The Mg + LY treatment decreased the levels of Akt ( p < 0.01) and pAkt ( p < 0.01), with a marginally significant difference in p85 protein expression compared with the Mg group ( p = 0.06) ( Figure 7 E), while the Mg + Ra treatment significantly decreased the expression level of p85 ( p < 0.05), Akt ( p < 0.05) and pAkt ( p < 0.05) compared with the Mg group.

A longer OS was observed in elderly patients (age>70 years) and first-line chemotherapy pts in the PMA-ZEO group (median time of OS = 39.7 months, CI = 3.1–76.3) in comparison with the placebo group (median time of OS = 21.8 months, CI = 15.2–28.3); the difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

The difference between the stop and arrow projection conditions was marginally significant ( p = 0.06). 6.

There was a marginally significant indirect effect from birth mother emotion dysregulation to adoptive fathers’ overreactivity through prenatal distress (β = −0.01, SE = 0 .01, p = 0.06).

For response times, a marginally significant main effect of online review [ M positive = 1078.787 ms, SE = 62.632; M negative = 999.723 ms, SE = 53.379; F (1, 22) = 3.948, p = 0.060, η 2 = 0.152] and a significant main effect of brand familiarity were identified [ M familiar = 1065.109 ms, SE = 59.244; M unfamiliar = 1013.401 ms, SE = 52.142; F (1,22) = 5.385, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.197].

Results showed a significant effect of TIME [ F (1, 35) = 10.42, p = 0.003], in line with overall forgetting over the retention interval and a marginally significant effect of REGULARITY [ F (1, 35) = 3.79, p = 0.06], reflecting better temporal order memory for no-rule faces than rule faces, across groups and retrieval sessions ( Figure 5C ).

and retained important independent variables such as directly asking patients about DA etc. DA screening practice was significantly associated with gender (AOR = 0.46, P = 0.037), place of work (AOR = 3.68, P = 0.039), and interest in continuing education courses (AOR = 3.21, P = 0.015) whereas directly asking patient about DA was a marginally significant factor in the study (AOR = 2.20, P = 0.060) ( Table 3 ).

1D) and led to a marginally significant increase in gait speed (MD = 0.12 m/s, 95 % CI: −0.00, 0.24, I 2 = 53 %, p = 0.060, Appendix Fig. 2C), but did not affect the SMI, lean mass, body fat, BMI, handgrip strength, gait speed, or QoL (Appendix Figs. 1 and 2).

The main effect of agent type was marginally significant, F (1, 232) = 3.58, p = 0.060, η p 2 = 0.015; specifically, participants rated it less permissible in the AI agent condition ( M = 48.49, SD = 2.05, 95% CI [44.45, 52.52]) than those in the human agent condition ( M = 53.93, SD = 2.02, 95% CI [49.96, 57.90]).

The difference between the correlation coefficients was marginally significant ( z = 1.49, p = 0.06). 4.3.

AR 2 and AR 3 populations show a marginally significant deviation from expectation of neutrality ( p < 0.06 for AR 2 ; p < 0.07 for AR 3 ).

Also, after removing the thirteen TG+ subjects (three of whom developed T1D) from the T1D analysis, the association between ovalbumin antibody concentrations and T1D development became marginally significant (p = 0.06) ( Table 2 ) .

A marginally significant partial correlation was found between the frequency of imagery intrusions and detail recognition memory after controlling for gist ( r = .24, p = .06).

It also shaped Alpha diversity in concert with root morphology, although the effect of root morphology was marginally significant ( P = 0.06), and soil water temperature had no significant influence.

The Change Type × Probe Location interaction was marginally significant, F (1, 19) = 3.95, p = .06, η p 2 = .17, 90% CI [.00, .39], BF 10 = 1.89, reflecting a tendency for the inside-triangle benefit to be larger for orientation changes (12%, p < .0001, d z = 0.88, BF 10 = 81.35) than for color changes (4%, p = .04, d z = 0.41, BF 10 = 1.78), though accuracy was significantly better for both orientation and color changes when they were part of the illusory triangle.

-3.50±0.72%; P = 0.06). We observed a marginally significant decrease in SDBP (systolic to diastolic blood pressure) between the two groups after adjustment for waist circumference ( P = 0.06).

Time from PCa diagnosis to MDT was marginally significant ( p = 0.06) with a hazard ratio of 0.99.

2 B, the group main effect is marginally significant [ F (1,76) = 3.65, p = 0.06, η2p = 0.05].

In contrast, I bs was only a relatively weak and marginally significant (Beta = 0.180, p = 0.06) predictor of female obesity prevalence ( Table 5 ).

A 2 × 3 mixed-modelANOVA on IQ showed that there was a marginally significant main effect of age ( p = .06) but no main effect of group ( p = .1) and no age × group interaction ( p = .8).

Agreeableness showed marginally significant results (b = 2.39, p = 0.06).

Only neighborhood social cohesion was marginally significant (p = .06).

The directions of effect for mental work demands, physical work demands, and the interaction term were the same as in the main analysis, though the interaction term became marginally significant ( p = 0.06).