“marginally significant”

Overall, 8 patients in group A (25%) and 6 patients in group B (8.8%) developed MDR-gram negative BSI, unveiling a marginally significant trend towards the reduction of MDR gram-negative BSI after withholding FQ prophylaxis ( p = 0.06).

Working Memory There was a statistically significant main effect for time, F (3, 69) = 24.16, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.51, main effect for condition, F (1, 23) = 7.59, p = 0.01, η 2 p = 0.25, and a marginally significant time by condition interaction, F (3, 69) = 2.51, p = 0.06, η 2 p = 0.10.

[ 18 ] dataset were marginally significant ( P = .060 and .096, respectively; Table 1 ).

Highest to lowest force modulation resulted in a marginally significant median IPF adjustment of 1.5 mm (0.8 to 2.7; P = 0.06).

C16:0 was proportionally the most abundant NLFA in Brazil and the difference from Germany was marginally significant (contribution = 20%, p = 0.06), although amounts again were higher in temperate species.

Deer groups tended (marginally significant, with P = 0.06) to diffuse at a faster rate when they travelled in areas composed of a smaller percentage of potential foraging patches.

ANOVA revealed a significant effect of pharmacological treatment (F (1,23) = 4.18, p < 0.05) and a marginally significant effect of stress (F (1,23) = 3.77, p = 0.06) at the 24 h time point.

Similarly, for the EEG data acquired simultaneously with the fMRI data, a marginally significant main effect of time-window was observed (F (4,48) = 2.42, p = 0.06), while the comparisons between the fifth and the first, second and third time windows approached statistical significance, or were statistical significant (p = 0.08, p = 0.03, and p = 0.02, respectively).

Likewise, after controlling for object-level performance (proportion correct), the AQ score × gamma correlation in Experiment 2 was non-significant when using a two-tailed test, rs (17) = − .37, p = .12, but marginally significant when using a one-tailed test, p = .06.

In Models 2 and Model 3, the association between evolocumab use and discharge mRS of 0–3 was marginally significant (adjusted OR 2.02, 95% CI 0.97–4.24, p = 0.06 and adjusted OR 1.98, 95% CI 0.94–4.22, p = 0.07, respectively).

Effects of TMS-induced Disruptions on Sensitivity ( d ′) In the lip experiment the effect of time on sensitivity ( d ′) was marginally significant ( F 2,34 = 3.04, P = 0.06; Table 3 , Fig. 5 A ).

A 2 (gender) × 3 (experimental conditions) ANOVA on the perceived importance of the socially related SDGs indicated a significant main effect of experimental conditions, F (2,293) = 4.72, p = 0.01, η p 2 = 0.08, a significant main effect of gender, F (1,293) = 23.95, p < 0.01, η p 2 = 0.08, and a marginally significant interactive effect of gender and experimental conditions, F (2,293) = 2.82, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.02.

The study of the relationship between cognitive abilities in different modalities showed that visual selective attention and auditory working memory had a marginally significant correlation ( P =0.06, r=0.43).

Interestingly, the association between the MYLIP genotype and the presence or absence of an LDLR mutation was marginally significant ( P =0.06).

The error data also revealed a marginally significant main effect of CSI, F (1,74) = 3.57, p = 0.06 (long preparation < short preparation), significant main effect of trial type F (1,74) = 25.45, p < 0.01 (repeat < switch), and significant CSI × trial type interaction, F (1,74) = 11.86, p < 0.01.

A marginally significant interaction between CtDCS condition and emotion was indeed found ( F 4,56 = 2.47, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.15).

The difference in field force between Count 2 and Count 4 was marginally significant ( P = 0.06).

follow-up, t (9) = 2.355, p < 0.05, d = 0.78 (see Table 3 ).There was a marginally significant main effect of Session for coefficient of variation of SART response times at baseline vs. follow-up, F (1,15) = 4.279, p < .06, η p 2 = 0.222 , that was accounted for by the GMT group, t (9) = 2.410, p < 0.04, d = 0.993 (see Table 3 ; Figure 1 , top right).

There was also a marginally significant 3-way interaction of target configuration, congruency, and experiment, F (1,34) = 3.74, MS e = 187, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.10, showing a smaller difference in the congruency effects between the horizontal and vertical target configuration trials in the present experiment (a difference of 9 ms) compared with Experiment 4 in Chen and Cave (a difference of 27 ms).

In addition, random-effects models demonstrated significantly lower left hippocampus N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) in PTSD when referenced to creatine (Cr) (k = 7 studies; pooled standardized mean difference −0.99, 95% CI −1.94 to −0.04, P = .04) with a marginally significant decrease on the right (k = 6 studies; pooled standardized mean difference −0.75, 95% CI −1.54 to 0.04, P = .06), while NAA referenced otherwise demonstrated significant effect for both left (k = 7 studies; pooled standardized mean difference −0.78, 95% CI −1.11 to −0.45, P = .001) and right (k = 6 studies; pooled standardized mean difference −0.73, 95% CI −1.25 to −0.22, P = .01) hippocampus.

4b–e ), while abundance expressed a marginally significant relationship with latitude ( P = 0.060) (Fig. 4a ).

The LMEs for the language-unimpaired group showed a marginally significant effect for the local-to-global cost only (Estimate: −71.09, SE: 6.81, t = −7.87, p = .06).

However, the difference between cohorts for relevance is marginally significant ( F = 3.52, p = 0.06).

Within subgroup 7, metastatic status was marginally significant (HR 4·45, 0·91–21·71 [95% CI], p = 0·06; Fig. 1 f, p = 0·04, log-rank test; Fig. 1 i).

Taxon was marginally significant ( P = 0.06; Table 5 ) and R. argentea exhibited a slightly lower CT Max (36.01 ± 0.17 °C; mean ± SE) than B. sadleri (37.60 ± 0.09 °C; mean ± SE) and haplochromine cichlid juveniles (37.81 ± 0.22 °C; mean ± SE) ( Fig. 3A ; Table 5 ).