“marginally significant”

While the effect of baseline gait speed on subsequent mental intactness was slightly attenuated and became marginally significant (β=.030, 95% CI 0.002-0.061; P =.06), the reverse pathway still strongly held (β=.084, 95% CI 0.049-0.120; P <.001; Multimedia Appendix 2 ).

For the covert-attention task paradigm, there were also no significant correlations between IAF and any of the ERP components or the latency differences between components in the UVF ( Table 1 ), although a negative correlation between IAF and the C1 peak latency was marginally significant [ r (16) = −0.45, p = 0.06].

Within subgroup 7, metastatic status was marginally significant (HR 4·45, 0·91–21·71 [95% CI], p = 0·06; Fig. 1 f, p = 0·04, log-rank test; Fig. 1 i).

There is a significant difference when comparing the mean RMCBS slopes of symptomatic infected C57BL/6 and infected balb/c (p = 0.01); a significant difference when comparing symptomatic infected C57BL/6 and non-infected C57BL/6 controls (p = 0.004); a marginally significant difference (p = 0.06) when comparing symptomatic infected C57BL/6 with asymptomatic infected C57BL/6; a non-significant difference when comparing infected balb/c and non-infected control balb/c (p = 0.48); and a non-significant difference (p = 0.70) when comparing infected balb/c with asymptomatic infected C57BL/6 and non-infected control C57BL/6.

Furthermore, it was marginally significant following exclusion of participants with MDD ( p = .06, η p 2 = .08) or ADHD ( p = .06, η p 2 = .08).

Analysis of Cohort 2 revealed a similar, though marginally significant effect of MSEW, with MSEW mice again moving faster than controls (p = 0.06).

Total caloric intake was marginally significant (p < 0.06) between children of single-parent households (1910 ± 24) and dual-parent households (1,860 ± 25).

Living in low or middle terciles of institutional land increases the odds of not walking for leisure but the p-value for the lowest tercile is marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

The main effect of condition was marginally significant, F (3, 66) = 2.71, MSE = 27.31, p = .06, η 2 p = .11, and a significant Group × Condition interaction was found, F (3, 66) = 4.37, MSE = 27.31, p = .01, η 2 p = .17, reflecting the fact that especially blinkers required a relatively long target duration in the rotated distractors condition.

The change in perceived need for regulation on privacy grounds is marginally significant at p = 0.06.

In the higher fit group, a group × time interaction was observed at the 1st, F (1, 23) = 12.10, p < 0.01, η 2 = 0.35, 2nd, F (1, 23) = 5.94, p < 0.01, η 2 = 0.21, and 3rd PI, F (1, 23) = 5.32, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.19), due to a longer IT at post-test than at pre-test in the control group [1st PI, F (1, 10) = 12.94, p = 0.01, η 2 = 0.56; 2nd PI, F (1, 10) = 5.97, p < 0.01, η 2 = 0.37, and marginally significant at the 3rd PI; F (1, 10) = 4.43, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.31].

Yet, in our model, parrotfish density was marginally significant ( p = 0.06), the component of variance was minor and lower than other significant variables (3.9%), and no interactions were observed with taxa.

There was a marginally significant contrast for the interaction of task and periods i and ii, F (1,25) = 4.0, P = .06, η 2 p = .14, indicating a steeper decline in mu power from period i to ii during the report-grasp task (from 4.75 μV 2 to 3.01 μV 2 ) than during the report-colour task (from 4.41 μV 2 to 3.12 μV 2 ).

In 2012, a study of the Tunisian population including 438 breast cancer cases and 332 controls found that rs763110 had a marginally significant association with lymph node-negative status (OR =0.53, P =0.06; OR =0.73, P =0.07, respectively). 25 However, it is demonstrated that the C allele of the rs763110 SNP may be associated with a lower risk of lymph node metastasis and a higher occurrence of HER2-positive breast cancers.

Additionally, mothers with lower education levels consumed more alcohol than those with higher education levels, but this association was marginally significant (12.2% vs. 6.2%, respectively; p = 0.06). 3.2.

Additionally, for the picture area, there was a marginally significant difference on fixation duration between the two conditions ( b = 0.45, SE = 0.23, t = 1.96, p = 0.06) and the fixation duration of the congruent condition was shorter than that of the incongruent condition.

A marginally significant main effect of Presentation [ F (1,29) = 3.77, p = 0.06] but no significant effects of Group or Group × Presentation emerged for RMSSD.

However, during the GFP period, a clear gradient emerged: VPD sensitivity did not significantly change in good years ( p > 0.10) but showed a statistically significant improvement in bad years ( p = 0.01), and a marginally significant increase in normal years ( p = 0.06) (Supplementary Fig. 18 ).

The main effect of disease stage was significant for ONLT ( P = 0.04), marginally significant for NFLT and OPLT ( P = 0.06), and not statistically significant for INLT, ONLT, OSLT, RPET, and OSCT ( P ≥ 0.2).

Baseline IL-6 was a marginally significant factor ( F 2,488 = 2.70, p = 0.06) suggesting greater reactivity in individuals with lower baseline IL-6 levels compared to those with higher levels at 75 min ( p = 0.02) but not at 45 min post-stress ( p = 0.16).

The risk group effect was marginally significant F(1, 97) = 3.71, p = 0.06, ηp 2 = 0.04, and there was no group*sex interaction F(1, 97) = 0.18, p = 0.67, ηp 2 = 0.002.

According to the univariate analysis, LNR ≥0.7 had a marginally significant impact on LRC ( p =0.06) ( Figure 2 ).

A Bin (0–10 and 81–90) × Group ANOVA showed a marginally significant main effect of the factor Bin ( F (1,36) = 3.84, p = 0.06, ηp 2 = 0.10).

There was a positive and marginally significant relationship between changing diet and per capita incidence of ciguatera ( p = 0.06), and secondary medical problems and per capita incidence of ciguatera ( p = 0.08) ( Table 6 ).

However lack of UIP/NSIP pattern on histopathology was marginally significant ( p = 0.06).