“marginally significant”

Concerning reaction time, there was a marginally significant TIME × TREATMENT GROUP interaction with df = 2(28), F = 2.7, P = 0.06.

Additionally, NHR showed a marginally significant mediation effect (7.26%; P = 0.060) on the risk of low eGFR ( Fig. 3 ).

Fecal microbiota of FM+LR+Abx-treated mice were highly enriched with butyrate metabolism pathway compared to water-treated mice ( P < 0.05) and PBS+Abx-treated mice ( P = 0.06, marginally significant) ( Fig. 7C ).

The LMEs for the language-unimpaired group showed a marginally significant effect for the local-to-global cost only (Estimate: −71.09, SE: 6.81, t = −7.87, p = .06).

Importantly, a marginally significant training main effect (F(1,36) = 3.77, p = 0.06) was revealed by a Group (complete trainee/control) by Threshold (5/10/15/20%) ANOVA for the difference in average HRC size ( Threshold as the repeated measure).

However, there was a marginally significant difference in SART reaction times (seconds) between T1 ( M = 0.37, SE = 0.008) and T2 ( M = 0.39, SE = 0.009), F (1, 48) = 3.60, p = 0.06, with the means indicating that the participants were slower on the SART task post-training. 4 Discussion AI-related technologies are developed with the goal of augmenting and improving human efficiency.

Pz) was marginally significant, F (1,87) = 2.84, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.06.

There was a marginally significant Group × Cue Validity interaction for P100 latencies, F (2, 53) = 2.92, p = 0.06, η P 2 = 0.10.

None of the adverse events reported by patients (N = 65) was influenced by the patients’ CYP1A2 expression (P > 0.1), and CYP3A4 expression had a marginally significant effect on constipation [47.1% in normal/high CYP3A4 expressers, 71.4% in low CYP3A4 expressers, OR = 3.6 (95%CL = 0.9–14.1), Wald ChiSq = 3.4, N = 65, P = 0.06] (Table 3 ), indicating that patients expressing CYP3A4 at low level tended to report constipation more frequently.

For the luminance values, there was no main effect of transparency, F (1,49) = 0.06, p = .8, and no interaction, F (1,49) = 2.01, p = .16, but a marginally significant main effect of colour dominance, F (1,49) = 3.61, p = .06.

However, there was a marginally significant interaction between TF, amount, electrode, and impulsivity ( F 2.4,38.4 = 2.92, P = 0.06, η 2 = 0.15).

Additionally, the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test revealed no significant differences between the pre-test and post-test within individual groups, except for a marginally significant change in the Control group ( p = 0.06).

However, the significant decrease noted by this method in the left hemisphere between (Hi, MOF) was also marginally significant in native space analysis ( P = 0.06).

The non-white ethnoracial background participants tended to have a lower incident rate for the number of physical violence-related TBI events, being marginally significant (non-white vs white, adjusted IRR: 0.501 (95% CI, 0.244 to 1.029), P value=0.060).

In the final multivariate model, only gender was found to be significant (p = 0.02), while physical illness was marginally significant (p = 0.06) Discussion To our knowledge this is the first study from Pakistan that measures the prevalence estimate of anxiety using a validated instrument.

Moreover, the interaction of partner diagnosis and social motivation was marginally significant for autistic actors ( b = 0.02, SE = 0.01, p = 0.06).

Assessing whether the correlations of the MM and the control groups were significantly different, we found the intergroup correlation coefficient difference to be marginally significant [two-tailed z = 1.88, P = 0.060, same statistical results for both the resting state variance and task peak-to-peak activity analyses].

For incident CKD, every category that included HTN and/or T2DM showed significant risk; this risk was marginally significant for the PreDM/HTN group (1.19 [0.98–1.43], P =0.06).

Based on one-tailed tests, results showed greater positive change in working memory, t(57)=1.69, p<.05, for the literacy group relative to the control, and a marginally significant difference in change in episodic memory, t(57)=1.62, p<.06, but not in verbal fluency, t< 1.

Health self-efficacy improvement from baseline to 3 months was significant among younger participants in the intervention (p<.05) but not the control arm (p=.54) (d=.20) and marginally significant among older survivors (age 60+) in intervention (p=.06) but not the control arm (p=.58) (d=.28).

Findings point to a partial mediation with a significant direct effect (b = .37, SE = .16, p = .02, 95% bootstrap CI=[.07, .68]), a marginally significant indirect effect (b = .08, SE = .04, p = .06, 95% bootstrap CI=[-.003, .18]) and a significant total effect (b = .46, SE = .16, p < .001, 95% bootstrap CI=[.14, .77]).

A 2 × 3 mixed-modelANOVA on IQ showed that there was a marginally significant main effect of age ( p = .06) but no main effect of group ( p = .1) and no age × group interaction ( p = .8).

SaO 2 increased during the L compared to the F phase at HH independently of the exercise intensity ( p ≤ 0.01), with marginally significant results ( p = 0.06 and p = 0.090, for low and high intensity, respectively) and moderate effect sizes at low intensity (Cohen’s d = 0.484) and high intensity (Cohen’s d = 0.326), as can be seen in Fig. 5 .

This relationship was marginally significant when bare plots were excluded from the model ( P = 0.06).

There was a marginally significant validity/practice hours interaction, F (1,18) = 3.95, P = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.18, so that RT differences between valid and invalid trials decreased as hours of practice increased.