Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
No polymorphism showed association with bladder cancer risk at the 5% significance level, although individuals carrying the 280His variant allele had a marginally significant increased risk of bladder TCC compared to those carrying the homozygote wildtype genotype (adjusted OR [95% CI], 1.50 [0.98–2.28], p = 0.06).
marginally significantp = 0.0601.2× alphagold
In HC, the opposite pattern emerged, with marginally significant negative correlations between learning from negative feedback and ∆FRN in the first ( r = −0.347 , p = 0.060) and the second half ( r = −0.350 , p = 0.058) of the observation condition, but not the control condition ( r = −0.155 , p = 0.412 and r = −0.275 , p = 0.142, respectively).
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
SaO 2 increased during the L compared to the F phase at HH independently of the exercise intensity ( p ≤ 0.01), with marginally significant results ( p = 0.06 and p = 0.090, for low and high intensity, respectively) and moderate effect sizes at low intensity (Cohen’s d = 0.484) and high intensity (Cohen’s d = 0.326), as can be seen in Fig. 5 .
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
For patients with brain metastasis at baseline, the combination therapy achieved a significant better PFS than the monotherapy (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.39–0.90; p = 0.01), and a better OS with the difference marginally significant (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.46–1.02; p = 0.06).
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
The intervention had a significant positive effect on PIs’ intention to consume more water (mean pre = 3.46, SE = 0.09; mean post = 3.65, SE = 0.11; t (40) = −2.48; p = 0.02), and a marginally significant positive effect on their intention to consume less SSB (mean pre = 3.02, SE = 0.12; mean post = 3.31, SE = 0.12; t (40) = −1.93; p = 0.06). 4.
marginally significantp = 0.0601.2× alphagold
Overall, 70.4% (95% CI 67.1–73.6) initiated ANC in the second trimester and 20.8% (95% CI 17.9–24.0) began antenatal care in the first trimester. Determinants of uptake of at least three doses of IPTp with SP The results of multiple logistic regression analysis presented in Table 5 indicate that women who visited ANC clinics three times only during pregnancy have a marginally significant lower odds of completing the recommended number of IPTp-SP doses than those who made at least four ANC visits ( p = 0.060) after controlling for the relationships of the other predictors.