“marginally significant”

Results confirmed those emerged from the parametric analysis on log‐transformed data, showing a main effect of habituation trial, F (1,42) = 294.93, p < 0.001, and a marginally significant Habituation trial × Habituation order interaction, F (1,42) = 3.77, p = 0.059.

The Neighborhood Disadvantage x Race interaction was a marginally significant predictor of sleep efficiency ( p = .059).

There was also a marginally significant effect on empathy [ t (14) = 1.89, p = 0.059, ES = 0.145], but object-related absorption did not reach a significant level [ t (14) = 0.84, p = 0.403, ES = 0.061].

Statistically, the GABBR1 gene showed a marginally significant association between the NPC tumor and non-tumor tissue specimens (P = 0.059).

However, marginally significant difference was observed between CP and AP cases ( p = 0.059).

There was a marginally significant additive effect for the CG haplotype which reduced the expected number of malaria episodes (RR = 0.969, 95%CI: 0.939–1.001, P = 0.059).

The majority of participants (8/10) in the SC group showed a decline in total ACE-III score, eliciting a marginally significant median decrease, z = −1.89, p = 0.059.

When Tukey’s HSD bias correction is applied for CV-19 Threat between-group differences, the differences between the healthy group and comorbid group are marginally significant ( p = 0.059); differences between the PTSD group and comorbid group are significant ( p = 0.041), and differences between the chronic pain group and comorbid group are non-significant ( p = 0.162).

We observed a marginally significant interaction between the two variables ( F (1,46) = 3.737, p = 0.059), indicating a tendency for L2 listeners to have weaker sentence-level tracking than L1 listeners in the active condition ( p = 0.004) but not the passive condition ( p = 0.138).

Number of offspring was significantly positively related to FGA, but not to all other variables (including social success; here, the relationship turned out to be marginally significant: p = .059).

MDF results The MDF euthanasia values of the osteotomized femur compared to the control femur are statistically significantly higher for all groups, i.e., sixth week (P < 0.001), eighth week (P < 0.001), 10th week (P = 0.026), and marginally significant at the 12th week (P = 0.059).

Among the other variables, only age was marginally significant ( P =0.059) ( Table 3 ).

It was observed that in the comparison between groups, children in the IG showed a statistically significant reduction in UPF consumption when compared to the CG at visit 4 (β −1.27 [95% CI: −2.28; −0.27]) and at visit 3 (β −1.11 [95% CI: −2.24; −0.27]) and marginally significant at visit 5 (β −0.99 [95% CI: −2.01; 0.04], p = 0.059).

Male students skipping dinner ≥ occasionally were likely to have a higher cumulative probability of weight gain than those eating dinner every day, although the difference between these groups was at a marginally significant level ( p = 0.059) ( Figure 2 a).

As shown in Figure 4 , there was a marginally significant difference between women and men in mean PSS scores, with women reporting higher scores ( t = 2, p = 0.059, Cohen's d = 0.2).

The differences in the proportion of the distribution of these behavioral modification stages between the control and intervention groups were significant at 3 months ( p < 0.001) but marginally significant at 6 months ( p = 0.059).

The interaction of metricality and frequency was marginally significant ( F [1,63] = 3.69, P = 0.059, η G 2 = 0.006), and all other effects were nonsignificant (all P > 0.25).

The p -value for statistical interactions between PM 2.5 and GSTM1 genotype was marginally significant ( p = 0.059) when the SDNN component of HRV was considered but was not significant for HF ( p = 0.14) and LF ( p = 0.11).

A marginally significant correlation was observed between the first principal coordinate of functional SNVs and microbiome PC1 ( Figure 2(c ), R = 0.37, P = .059).

These differences were significant for Sv and Lv (P=0.014 and 0.030 respec- tively), and marginally significant for Vv (P=0.059).

Pain catastrophizing was positively associated with caregiver burden (β = .339, p < .01) and negatively associated with education (β = −.382, p < .01) and resilience (β = −.192, p < .059, marginally significant).

The iodine treatment resulted in a marginally significant, positive effect on the CCI of potato cultivated on sand ( p = 0.059) and silt soils ( p = 0.065), while a moderate but non-significant reduction of CCI values was observed in the case of sandy silt soil ( p > 0.50).

We also found a marginally significant interaction effect between solution type and region, F (2, 48) = 3.410, p = 0.059, η p 2 = 0.124, and a significant interaction effect between region and laterality, F (2, 48) = 7.785, p = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.245.

We then tested our second hypotheses on the moderating effects of caregivers’ perspective taking and observed three effects on the association between receiving emotional support and PLWD’s hair cortisol ( β = 0.56, p = .003), the association between receiving practical support and PLWD’s hair cortisol ( β = −0.39, p = .013), and the association between receiving emotional support and PLWD’s DHEA-to-cortisol ratio ( β = −0.41, p = .059; marginally significant).

For EI, a marginally significant difference between sexes was found on emotion management, F (1, 177) = 3.63, p = 0.059, η 2 = 0.020.