“marginally significant”

The association of ACEI/ARB with log [Calc/BSA] was marginally significant ( p = 0.0586) (Fig. 3 ) Moreover, the association of diuretics with log [Calc/BSA] was significant ( p = 0.0020).

The interaction of sample size with baseline severity was marginally significant, p = 0.0586, and the pattern indicated that baseline severity was somewhat more predictive for smaller than for larger studies.

For individual group baseline to post-intervention comparisons, green tea showed a marginally significant change ( p = 0.0587), suggesting a potential trend, but the evidence was not strong enough to draw firm conclusions.

(i) MTHFR rs1801133: There was a marginally significant genotype distribution between all PsA patients and healthy controls (CC, CT, TT: 36%, 57%, and 7% versus 49%, 49%, and 2%; p = 0.0589), and PsA patients had a significantly higher frequency of the variant T-allele versus healthy controls (36% versus 26.5%; OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.01 - 2.31, p = 0.0477).

Monkeys with OFC lesions failed to show differential pupil responses during the CS and trace periods (main effect of CS, F (1,3) = 2.46; p > 0.05 for the CS period; F (1,3) = 4.65; p > 0.05 for the trace period), although they showed marginally significant pupil responses during the reward period ( F (1,3) = 8.83; p ≈ 0.0589).

There is marginally significant between the smoking status (11.26% vs 21.21%, P = 0.059) and drinking status (2.81% vs 9.85%, P = 0.056) between the CPAP-treated and non-CPAP-treated cohorts.

We found a significant difference between the conditions at 83%, t (22) = 2.319, p < 0.05, and a marginally significant difference at 17%, t (22) = −2.01, p = 0.059 (Figure 2 ), although none of the tests survived Bonferroni correction.

A significant two-way interaction between group and hemisphere was also observed [ F (2,36) = 3.36, p = 0.046, η p 2 = 0.16], indicating that both the low-arousal music [ F (1,36) = 6.82, p = 0.013, η p 2 = 0.16] and high-arousal music groups [ F (1,36) = 29.18, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.45] exhibited stronger neural responses in the left than right hemisphere, while the silence group showed a marginally significant difference in neural responses between the left and right hemispheres [ F (1,36) = 3.80, p = 0.059, η p 2 = 0.10].

There was a marginally significant relation of hippocampal volume with both nigral (−0.52 cm 3 , P = 0.059) and limbic (−0.38 cm 3 , P = 0.051) Lewy bodies.

The total dose of rhFSH used was marginally significant ( p = 0.059).

4 D), there was a statistically significant difference in the log area under FFV between older normal subjects and patients with glaucoma for the uncrowded condition (2.71 vs 2.46, t (55) = 4.36, P < 0.001), whereas there was a marginally significant difference for the crowded condition (1.90 vs 1.74, t (55) = 1.92, P = 0.059).

A marginally significant correlation was observed between the first principal coordinate of functional SNVs and microbiome PC1 ( Figure 2(c ), R = 0.37, P = .059).

In particular, there were marginally significant reductions from level -3 to level -2, F (1, 44) = 3.75, p = .059, η p a r t i a l 2 = .08, and from level -2 to level -1, F (1, 44) = 3.17, p = .082, η p a r t i a l 2 = .07, and a marginally significant increase from level -1 to level 0, F (1, 44) = 3.90, p = .055, η p a r t i a l 2 = .08.

It was observed that in the comparison between groups, children in the IG showed a statistically significant reduction in UPF consumption when compared to the CG at visit 4 (β −1.27 [95% CI: −2.28; −0.27]) and at visit 3 (β −1.11 [95% CI: −2.24; −0.27]) and marginally significant at visit 5 (β −0.99 [95% CI: −2.01; 0.04], p = 0.059).

chiloensis , we observed a positive correlation between EL and TgL ( r = .464; p = .004) and a marginally significant one between EL and WL ( r = .313; p = .059).

Moreover, the effect of the Pet-related Avoidance Scale was marginally significant [ F ( 1 , 432 ) = 3.597, p = 0.059]; dogs of owners with elevated PAVS tended to approach the toy object later, and there was a significant PAVS × PANXS interaction [ F ( 1 , 432 ) = 5.568, p = 0.019; dogs of owners with lower PAVS and PANXS tended to approach the toy object sooner].

A marginally significant difference was confirmed at the peak IHE among the two groups ( p = 0.059).

In addition, three factors showed a marginally significant association with CRSWD: Older age ( p = 0.059), unemployment ( p = 0.075), and no exercise habits ( p = 0.092).

The results of analysing the accuracy rates showed that: (1) the main effect of cognitive effort-avoidance was significant, F (1,16) = 5.758, P = 0.029, η 2 = 0.265; and (2) the interaction effect between patient condition and cognitive effort-avoidance was marginally significant, F (1,16) = 4.120, P = 0.059, η 2 = 0.205.

Finally, a marginally significant interaction between visual input and age group (F(4,137) = 2.34, p = 0.059) suggested that the benefit of visual speech for speech comprehension differed between age groups.

On the other hand, there were no significant differences between the groups at baseline (P=0.212); a marginally significant difference at 3 months (P=0.059), and a statistically significant difference at 6 months between the two groups were seen such that the outcome favored the test group (P=0.005; Tables 1 and 2 ; Fig. 2 ).

41 The association between fatigue and depression in the present SCD sample was marginally significant ( r = 0.43; p = 0.059).

When classification task and action jointly switched, the associated full switch costs remained constant across immediate and remote tests in the wake group ( b = −10.58, t = −1.06, P = 0.288), whereas a marginally significant decrease was seen after sleep ( b = −18.93, t = −1.89, P = 0.059) ( Fig. 2 C).

The results showed a significant hemisphere × age interaction effect on global efficiency [ t = 2.99, P = 0.009; false discovery rate (FDR)–corrected] and a marginally significant interaction effect on local efficiency ( t = 2.24, P = 0.059; FDR-corrected) in TD infants, whereas no significant results were observed in infants with congenital SNHL ( E glob : t = −1.13, P = 0.26; E loc : t = −1.44, P = 0.16; FDR-corrected).

The main effect of Group was marginally significant ( F (1, 83) = 3.657, p = 0.059, η 2 = .016).