“marginally significant”

Following a period OFF-stimulation, the Y-BOCS score lowered by 4.52 ± 1.73 [95% CI = (−7.90, −0.67)], constituting a marginally significant change ( t = −2.60, p = 0.0580).

However, this correlation was marginally significant in the active-sham differences between the magnitudes of vocal responses and the amplitudes of the P1 responses ( r = 0.339, p = 0.058).

A Sex × Target mixed ANOVA yielded a significant main effect of Target, F (2, 60) = 60.45, p < 0.0001, partial η 2 = 0.67, and a marginally significant main effect of Sex, F (1, 30) = 3.88, p = 0.058, partial η 2 = 0.11.

However, when quality of contact was entered, intergroup contact became marginally significant ( b = 0.118, p = 0.058).

In addition, we can note a marginally significant result (p = 0.058) for the intervention effect in reducing the prevalence of lack of control over drinking behavior (OR adj = 0.55, 95%CI 0.30–1.02).

The restriction digest controls form high leverage points when modelling this as a function of the number of PCR cycles, leading to significant or marginally significant models ( S25A–S25C Fig ) (30xCA: p = 0.058, 20xATCT: p<0.001, 10xATCT: p<0.001; GAM).

Relationships of drought-tolerance diversity with community stability were weak: We found a marginally significant positive effect of functional diversity of stomatal control on community stability ( t = 1.92, P = 0.058) but no significant relationship with functional diversity of resistance-acquisition ( t = 1.12, P = 0.27; fig.

Children from higher-income households were more likely to be in Profile 2 (normative functioning) than in Profile 1 “Relative weakness in all domains” (see Table 3 ), though findings were marginally significant (OR=0.55, p =0.058).

Group I patients showed better final hearing levels compared with group II patients (42.00±22.35 dB and 57.38±26.40 dB, respectively), although this difference was marginally significant (p = 0.058).

3 Results 3.1 Behavioural results As seen from Table 1 , there was a marginally significant difference between the boys and girls in reading accuracy, as reflected by character recognition (t = 1.916, df = 101.9, p = 0.058), but the sex difference in reading comprehension, as reflected by silent sentence reading, was not significant (t = 1.200, df = 94.713, p = 0.233).

These differences were small, but marginally significant (p=.058; p=.038) with standard estimation; There was no significant difference between the two groups for daily functioning and coping.

Furthermore, a marginally significant association was observed between workshop attendance and practice ( p-value = 0.058), indicating that specialized training may influence clinical actions.

The Friedman test revealed marginally significant differences among conditions for “Anger–Hostility” ( p = 0.058) and “Confusion–Bewilderment” ( p = 0.079).

The difference between women and men was marginally significant for the 2003/04 (p = 0.058) and the 2010/11 (p = 0.056) seasons.

The association between experiencing conflicts with parents and traditional bullying perpetration was marginally significant ( b = 0.207, SE = 0.109, p = 0.058, AME = 0.126).

Paired contrasts suggested marginally significant reductions (α < 0.1) of nymphs on trees treated with Actigard in 2015 compared with untreated controls ( t = 2.1; df = 1, 192; P = 0.058; Fig. 2A , right panel).

The expression of RiMST2 and RiPT in the +M plants showed a similar trend to P status, with significant or marginally significant ( P = 0.058) decreases by LP in the late growth stage but no significant effects in the early growth stage.

Furthermore, more frequent interpersonal communication was marginally significant in predicting value-expressive attitudes (β = 0.08, p = .058).

Levels of hs-troponin I seemed to increase immediately after sauna in males, but this change was very small and marginally significant (0.002–0.005 ng/mL; p = 0.058) (Table 3 ).

Patients living in Riyadh had lower total scores (130.5±42.1 versus 150.8±57.4), which was marginally significant ( p =0.058).

Analysis adjustment by age showed that the patients with presence of G/G genotype for the rs3826392 variant have a protective effect for TNM III+IV stages (OR=0.45; 95% CI=0.23-0.87, P =0.027); while, individuals with the T/T genotype for the rs3809728 variant, have a marginally significant difference for TNM III+IV stages (OR=2.28; 95% CI=1.03- 5.03, P =0.058) ( Table 4 ).

The difference in the external iliac node failure between the weighted groups was marginally significant ( p = 0.058).

The model coefficients analysis showed that an individual practicing preventive behavior has marginally significant ( p = 0.058) increased odds of the decision to vaccinate against COVID-19 by 67.7%.

The survival analysis for T-TLG showed significant differences in RFS ( P = 0.018) and marginally significant differences in OS ( P = 0.058) between the T-TLG ≤ 70 cm 3 and > 70 cm 3 groups.

For the OPS model, Ball selection accuracy (Strike) had a significant positive direct effect on OPS (standardized β = 0.560, p = 0.026), and Stroop RT (Horizontal) had a marginally significant effect on Ball selection accuracy (Strike) (standardized β = 0.452, p = 0.058), suggesting a potential indirect pathway between them.