“marginally significant”

Interestingly, this later SNP (rs2305198; HK1) was marginally significant in univariable analysis (p = 0.02), illustrating that its inclusion in the model and significant association are conditional on the genotypes at rs7072268 (HK1).

Another study involving the same participants showed a marginally significant association between excessive polypharmacy and prolonged hospital stay (parameter estimate = 0.20; R 2 value = 0.01; p ‐value = 0.02) (Jeong et al. 2018 ).

The effect of NO 3 and the interaction between NO 3 and OE were insignificant, but the difference in mean survival between heated tanks with and without OE was marginally significant (t 15 = –2.63, P = 0.020).

1C ), we recalculated the burden test excluding both rs3792646 and rs2271708, and observed a marginally significant enrichment of rare variants in cases ( P = 0.02), suggesting the existence of multiple effect alleles in C7 .

In contrast to the global ancestry estimates noted above, these local ancestry estimates at the MYH9 locus, did show a significant association with non-diabetic ESKD status in the Hispanic American population ( P = 0.0002 for Welch's two-sample t -test, P = 0.0009 for Kolmogorov–Smirnov test) and marginally significant association in the African American population ( P = 0.02 for Welch's two-sample t -test, P = 0.06 for Kolmogorov–Smirnov test).

However, in cases in which the probability of positive result was set on 1/3 (leaving 2/3 probability of negative or indifferent result, however, see Discussion ), results became marginally significant (six of eight, p = .02; six of eight, p = .02; respectively, five of eight, p = .088).

Further pairwise comparisons revealed significantly lower AUC for the participant-conducted urine rapid test compared to the blood rapid test ( P =0.002) ( Figure 1B ), marginally significant differences between the staff-conducted urine rapid test and blood rapid test ( P =0.020) ( Figure 1C ), and no significant difference between staff-conducted and participant-conducted urine rapid tests ( P =0.317) ( Figure 1D ).

In contrast, the genetic correlation between self-harm phenotypes and chronic pain were relatively weak and either marginally significant or nonsignificant (self-harm ideation: r g [95% CI] = 0.14 [0.05 to 0.22], p = .02; self-harm behavior: r g [95% CI] = 0.13 [0.01 to 0.26], p = .47).

Multi-agent chemotherapy was shown to be linked with a marginally significant increase in overall survival (HR:0.79, p = 0.02) and a marginally significant increase in progression-free survival (PFS) (HR:0.86, p = 0.05) [ 69 ].

The correlation between adolescents’ negative metacognitive beliefs and parental involvement was marginally significant ( r = 0.26, p = 0.02) when Bonferroni corrections of the alpha level were considered.

The MANOVA showed only a marginally significant difference between the planes for PC1 ( p = 0.0206) but statistically reliable difference between the planes for PC2 and PC3 ( p < 0.01).

The main difference was sex differences in inbreeding depression were more noticeable, as the meta‐regression of sex was significant, opposed to marginally significant ( Q m = 5.31, df = 1, p = 0.021, R 2 = 1.63%; females estimate [95% CI] = 0.39 [0.15; 0.63]; males estimate [95% CI] = 0.27 [0.04; 0.51]; Supplementary Section 14 ).

reported a marginally significant association between histological subtype and marital status in their univariate analysis ( p = 0.021), but this link was subsequently contradicted by their multivariate analysis revealing marital status as an independent predictor of mortality [ 7 ].

The proportional hazards assumption was satisfied for the OS model (global Schoenfeld test p = 0.55) and marginally significant for the DFS model (p = 0.021), with no substantial time-dependent trends observed in individual plots (Fig.

A marginally significant correlation is also found between MLO SCA and PDSI NA ( r = 0.42, p ‐value = 0.021).

However, the scalar model showed a slight decrease in model fit (scalar: CFI = 0.942, RMSEA = 0.048, SRMR = 0.049), with a marginally significant chi-square difference test ( p = 0.021).

Supportive PTA had a marginally significant positive association with BI ( β = 0.126, p = 0.021).

ovata populations was marginally significant ( p = 0.021) but not significant in E. pauciflora ( p = 0.152).

Serum Treatment Predicts Sperm Performance in Follicular Fluid Sperm parameters measured after serum treatment predicted respective sperm traits in follicular fluid treatment at all time points except hyperactivation at 60 min, but also this association was marginally significant (VCL 60 min: F = 5.391, p = 0.021, VCL 180 min: F = 9.402, p = 0.003, VCL 300 min: F = 9.804, p = 0.002; HA 60 min: χ 2 = 3.388, p = 0.066; HA 180 min: χ 2 = 5.802, p = 0.016; HA 300 min: χ 2 = 13.225, p < 0.001, Table 2 and Table S7 ).

S1 ) indicated only a marginally significant difference, 84.3% with PHA(L) of <0.839 and 52.9% with PHA(L) of ≥0.893 ( P = 0.021).

Notably, the predominance of OTU000018 increased during the experiment although the change was marginally significant ( p = 0.021). 3.6.

Correlations of R × G were only significant for the Saline River and marginally significant for the Little River (Mantel's r = 0.151, P = 0.021 for the Saline River; r = 0.772, P = 0.057 for the Little River; Fig. 6A and D ).

However, results suggest significant effects of housing conditions ( B = 0.191; p = 0.003) and marginally significant effects of training exposure (middle exposure: B = 0.4952; p = 0.0217) on cognitive trajectories.

Similarly, the 8p23-inv global F st (0.218) is marginally significant compared with the null distribution ( P < 0.022) (Supplemental Fig.

Differences between the most recent pre-pandemic assessments and the latest sweeps (ages 50/64.5 in NCDS/58 and 46/52.5 in BCS/70) were not significant in NCDS/58 (B prepandemic_time_NCDS/58 = 0.01 [−0.07, 0.09], p = 0.791) and marginally significant and negative in BCS/70 (B prepandemic_time_BCS/70 = −0.08 [−0.15, −0.01], p = 0.022), in line with the notion of a “bounce back” to (or even slight improvement compared to) pre-pandemic levels.