“marginally significant”

There were marginally significant differences in patients aged 35 to 65 and patients older 65 years ( t (281) = −1.90, p = .058). 4 Discussion and conclusion 4.1 Discussion For every person engagement in a specific behavior depends on the experience of ‘being ready’ to act.

Trial type was marginally significant, F (1,48) = 3.76, p = 0.058, with responses to trials including a smoke-related image being slower than those with only neutral contents (Global effect: 610 ms vs. 601 ms).

ToM remained a significant predictor of aggression in all covariate models, except when adjusting for total BPRS symptom severity, where ToM was marginally significant ( p = .058).

Using a pairwise comparison of ROC analyses of incident IHD, the AUC of TyG index data was significantly higher than that of fasting plasma glucose ( P = 0.016) and was marginally significant when compared with the AUC produced using serum triglyceride level data ( P = 0.058).

Diabetes mellitus was marginally significant ( p < 0.058) in a study by Chen et al, 1 but was not significant in the present study.

There was also a marginally significant main effect of aphasia group [ F (1,19) = 4.080, P = 0.058] a main effect of modality reflecting poorer performance for words [ F (1,19) = 6.858, P = 0.017] and an interaction of aphasia group and modality [ F (1,19) = 6.298, P = 0.021] (see below).

The positive joint effect of soda intake and smoking on COPD was marginally significant ( p = 0.058).

All differences remained significant after Bonferroni correction, except the difference between the CN- and CN + groups, which was marginally significant ( P = 0.058).

Percentage of hits and misses Regarding Hits, there were significant main effects for Matches [F 3, 111 = 36.8, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.50, op = 1.0] and marginally significant effects for Groups [F 1, 37 = 3.81, p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.09, op = 0.09], as well as a significant interaction between Groups and Matches [F 3, 111 = 4.69, p = 0.018, η p 2 = 0.11, op = 0.72].

Relationships of drought-tolerance diversity with community stability were weak: We found a marginally significant positive effect of functional diversity of stomatal control on community stability ( t = 1.92, P = 0.058) but no significant relationship with functional diversity of resistance-acquisition ( t = 1.12, P = 0.27; fig.

The multivariate test of the multivariate analysis of variance with number of correct answers, number of words per correct answer, and seconds per correct answer was marginally significant, F (3, 47) = 2.68, p = .058, η 2 = .15.

A marginally significant linear association (Fig. 2k and Supplementary Fig. 3e ; R 2 = 0.12; P = 0.058, n = 30) was observed between patient prevalence and total length of the involved gene pairs, and no significance was observed in brain and solid tumors (Supplementary Fig. 3f, g ).

Although an increase was observed in Zn group, it became marginally significant with a slight difference compared to the reference ( p =.058).

Results Training phase In the training phase, the main effect of image type on go RTs was marginally significant ( p = .058); planned comparisons revealed marginally significant differences between the stop-associated images (428 ms) and the go-associated images (422 ms), t (30) = −1.99, p = .055, g av = 0.234, and between the stop-associated images and the control images (422 ms), t (30) = −1.92, p = .064, g av = 0.242.

Group I patients showed better final hearing levels compared with group II patients (42.00±22.35 dB and 57.38±26.40 dB, respectively), although this difference was marginally significant (p = 0.058).

For hormone-related cancers, birth order and age at menarche had the most influence on this relation, while maternal proteinuria, birth order and own parity had the most effect on non-hormonal cancer risk. Birth length and cancer risk Univariate analysis A positive and statistically significant trend was found between birth length and all cancers combined (P = 0.007), and non- hormonal cancers (P = 0.011), while a marginally significant trend was found for combined hormone-related cancers and colon cancer (P = 0.058), adjusted for gestational age.

On the efficacy of the strategy being used, ANOVA revealed a marginally significant effect [ F (2, 22) = 3.553, p = 0.058].

In the gender subgroup, the association was marginally significant in females (β = -0.024; 95% CI: -0.050 to 0.001; P = 0.058) compared to males (β = -0.016; 95% CI: -0.038 to 0.006; P = 0.134).

Global Disorganization of CT Networks in HA Patients Among the four morphological networks examined, only the CT network showed marginally significant differences in shortest path length among the three groups ( F = 2.872, p = 0.058).

Additionally, a marginally significant group × time interaction was observed in the P1 amplitude ( χ 2 (4) = 3.602, p = 0.058, B = 1.137; Fig. 5 B-C).

Notably, in our study the stressor induced a marginally significant increase of REM% in the first 8 th segment of sleep (distressing film: Mean 1.18 min, SD 2.98; neutral film: Mean 0.10 min, SD 0.45; t = 1.97, p = 0.058) and a trend-level shortening of REM latency with increasing emotional impact in LSQR ( r = −.45, p = 0.062).

2 ), a marginally significant Age x Group interaction effect was observed ( F (1, 119) = 3.66, p = 0.058, η 2 = 0.03).

Finally, the results showed a marginally significant interaction between priming language and prime-sentence relatedness ( F (1, 22) = 3.99, p =.058, η p 2 = 0.154).

Total cholesterol level was a marginally significant predictor ( P = 0.058).

However, a marginally significant difference in RTs between the two groups for disengaging by conflict [ F (1,56) = 3.734, p = 0.058, ω 2 = 0.044], suggesting that the effects tend to be lower for AVGPs (15.52 ± 51.68) than for NAVGPs (47.49 ± 57.09) 2 , although the effect size was relatively small.