“marginally significant”

Organizational justice was a marginally significant predictor, β= 0.09, p = 0.057, whereas Quality of leadership, Horizontal trust and Sense of community at work did not significantly predict sustainable employability. 4.

Sensitivity analyses Sensitivity analyses based on multiple imputation data showed highly similar results; for example, all significant results reported above were also significant except for physical quality of life, which became marginally significant ( P = 0.057).

In the 450 ms delay condition, there was a marginally significant effect, t 26 = 1.992, p = 0.057.

Further post-hoc analysis on the interpersonal trust metric showed no significant group differences for males ( p = 0.119) but a marginally significant difference for females ( p = 0.057), with female athletes in the cooperative group exhibiting stronger interpersonal trust than those in the competitive group.

In terms of RT data, we found a marginally significant three-way interaction effect ( F (6,192) = 2.63, p = 0.057), along with significant main effects for price level ( F (6,192) = 5.66, p < 0.05), but not for group ( F (1,32) = 0.002 p = 0.96) and product type ( F (1, 32) = 0.02, p = 0.89).

For belief in the paranormal, we found significant rationality × sample (β = .35, p = .003) and experientiality × sample interactions (β = −.24, p = .036), as well as a marginally significant CRT × sample interaction (β = .21, p = .057).

There was only a marginally significant difference in the proportion of memory errors between conditions in Experiment 3 [β = −0.81; 95% CI = [1.61 3.34]; Z = −1.91; P = 0.057; (Memory Error Score ~ Condition + (1 | Participant) + (1 | Video Clip))].

Finally, there was a marginally significant two-step indirect effect between capitalization attempts and positive emotions via perceived active-constructive feedback and optimism, b = 0.002, SE = 0.001, p =.057.

Without controlling for SNR 2, there is a marginally significant positive association between PR‐Smiling and Laughing scores and left DMN functional connectivity ( F (5, 29) = 2.45, p = 0.057) ( R 2 = 0.30, Adjusted R 2 = 0.18), but not right DMN functional connectivity ( F (5, 29) = 0.31, p = 0.902) ( R 2 = 0.23, Adjusted R 2 = −0.11). 3.5 Exploratory Bayesian Analysis To test the extent of the association between PR‐Smiling and Laughing scores and left DMN functional connectivity, we employed a Bayesian regression analysis in JASP (Version 0.18.3; Coon et al. 2025 ; Kelter 2020 ).

Contrast analyses revealed that the control group showed a significantly larger PES effect (79.52 ms) than the alcohol group (38.97 ms), F (1, 28) = 6.92, p < 0.05, r = 0.44, and a marginally significant larger PES effect than the alcohol-placebo group (42.93 ms), F (1, 28) = 3.95, p = 0.057, r = 0.35.

In addition, the interaction of stimulus type × emotion type × time interval × hemisphere was marginally significant, F ⁢ ( 4 , 76 ) = 2.66 , p = 0.057 , η p 2 = 0.123 , indicating that the hemisphere effect of emotional vMMN varied by time interval.

Furthermore, the low‐dose group had a marginally significant change in the ADAS‐Cog score (adjusted P = .057).

Parasomnia, speech disorders, and cardiovascular disorders had higher RORs in women, while insomnia-related disorders, cognitive disorders, and movement disorders (marginally significant, p = 0.057) had higher RORs in men.

When the provider identification variable was removed from the model, age was marginally significant (p = 0.057) and device generation was highly statistically significant (p = 0.001).

However, during weeks 5–8, there were marginally significant increase in sperm motility in T3 and T4 boars ( P = 0.057; Table 5 ).

OWN song also evoked a higher proportion of suppressed responses compared with TUT (TUT: p = 0.011; OWN vs AdlCon was marginally significant, p = 0.057; Fisher’s exact test, Benjamini–Hochberg corrected).

In linear regression analyses end had a significant effect on current mood ( b = 0.33, SE = 0.11, p = 0.004) and a marginally significant effect on recalled mood impacts ( b = 0.32, SE = 0.17, p = 0.057).

There was a significant reduction in total cancer incidence (105 vs 137 cases, P = 0.03), prostate cancer (22 vs 42 cases, P = 0.005), a marginally significant reduction in colorectal cancer incidence (9 vs 19 cases, P = 0.057), and a reduction in cancer mortality, all cancer sites (40 vs 66 deaths, P = 0.008) (selenium versus control group cases reported, respectively) [ 98 ].

The effect of rotation was significant for the latency of the concurrent temporal sources ( F (7, 98) = 8.08, p < .0001, ε = .59) but was marginally significant for its amplitude ( F (7, 98) = 2.41, p = .057, ε = .59).

(An alternative analysis tested an ordered logistic regression model and the results were mostly the same as the main model, but racial concordance had an odds ratio of 1.15 but was marginally significant, p = 0.057.) The number of medical visits was associated with lacking a usual source of care, having a facility for the source, and being uninsured, as were being Latino or being Black Racial/ethnic, but racial concordance was not significantly related.

Genotype distribution of the ABCB1 C3435T variant was marginally significant between the two groups of patients (P = 0.057), the frequency of the T allele in Clopidogrel non-responders was higher than in the responders (15/19; 78.9%) and (19/36; 52.8%) respectively.

In the univariate analysis, GATA6 levels showed a marginally significant association with outcome, exclusively among patients receiving 5-FU/leucovorin (p=0.057) ( table 2 , see online supplementary table S7).

The encoding time for initial fixations was 214ms ( SD = 23ms) for the upper screen and 220ms ( SD = 21ms) for the lower screen; this difference is marginally significant, t (14) = 2.08, p = .057.

This association became marginally significant when covariates were added (β = –5.3, p = 0.057).

There was however a marginally significant negative correlation between participants’ scores on the non-planning factor of the BIS-11 and accuracy on the causal attribution task, r = −0.229, n = 70, p = 0.057.