The relationship between physical HRQOL and total MVPA was marginally significant ( p =0.054) and followed a similar pattern to that seen in weekly minutes of total PA.
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
However, we did find a marginally significant dose-response relationship for the number of completed modules and anxiety symptoms at 6 months ( b = − 0.204, p = 0 .054), indicating that adherence increases as anxiety symptoms decrease. 3.6 Moderation Table 5 shows the group × moderator interaction effects on the MHC-SF for each pre-specified moderator (age, gender, education, positive and negative life-events, extraversion, neuroticism and conscientiousness).
However, we did find a marginally significant three-way interaction effect between time, social distance and construal level ( F (1,150) = 3.76, p = .054, p η 2 = .024).
In addition, a marginally significant Condition by Learning Phase interaction emerged for Fz ( F (1,48) = 3.90; p = .054, ηp 2 = .07).
For the TD group, the difference between telic and atelic conditions was marginally significant, showing a more negative trend in the atelic condition compared to the telic condition: M = −0.789, SE = 0.409, t (756) = −1.931, p = 0.054 (see Figure 7 ).
However, the difference in mean post and mean current BMI was marginally significant (p=0.054).
For the modern transect, throat scores likewise differed significantly between zones C and D ( p < .001), but there were also significant differences within species: a marginally significant difference between zones A and B ( p = .054) in C. colliei and a highly significant difference between zones D and E ( p < .001; Table 1 ) in C. formosa .
Support for Sociopolitically Inspired Solutions to the Organ Shortage A similar ANCOVA on support resulted in main effects of registration status, F (2, 1214) = 207.06, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.26; and sociopolitical viewpoint, F (2, 1214) = 7.49, p < 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.01; as well as a marginally significant interaction between these two variables, F (4, 1214) = 2.34, p = 0.054, partial η 2 = 0.01.
A marginally significant weight reduction was observed from baseline to week 16 in the active condition of 5.3 pounds (t=2.07, DF=17, p=0.054).
3 Results 3.1 Impacts of ecosystem engineers on the growth of associated plants The microhabitat type had significant effects (marginally significant for L. longifolium in the DML population; P = 0.054) on both individual height and mass for all study species in all populations, except for L. perenne mass parameters in the YLS population ( Table 1 ; Figure 2 ).
Single child status also had a marginally significant enhancing impact on the persistence of PLEs ( p = .054). 4 Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first study on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on PLEs.
The main effect of task was marginally significant, indicating higher RTs in the Stroop compared with the Simon task (Δ = 17 ms), F (1, 38) = 3.96, p = .054, η p 2 = 0.09.
(2013 ) were marginally significant in our data set (p-values = 0.054 and 0.056).
There was a marginally significant difference between the 4-g amount of food compared with the 2-g amount ( P = 0.054).
Additionally, scale2 exhibited a marginally significant increase ( p =0.054).
Also perceived partner responsiveness as reported by the women was found to have a moderating effect, revealing a marginally significant four-way interaction between perceived partner responsiveness, gender, pressure, and film type, F (1, 40) = 3.95, p = .054.
There also was a marginally significant correlation between ratings of masked faces and attitudes towards others wearing or not wearing masks ( r = .14, p = .054).
Microstate C revealed, on a marginally significant level, less coverage ( F (1,84) = 3.810, P = 0.054, ETA 2 = 0.043) under oxytocin treatment ( M = 25.47%, s.d. = 4.01%) compared to placebo treatment ( M = 27.27%, s.d. = 4.56%).
The power of the circatidal period in the treatment group was higher compared to that of the control group, although the difference between them was marginally significant (χ 2 = 3.70, P = 0.054).
KRAS mutation status in tumor was marginally significant ( p = 0.054).
BFOM was a marginally significant mediator between structural barriers and KOOS-12 (coeff=−0.36, 95% CI=(−0.86, –0.02); p=0.054).
In addition, the positive P effect was marginally significant (Holm-corrected p = 0.054).
There was marginally significant interaction between the anesthetic techniques and postoperative recurrence formation ( P = .054).
The High-Tension Compensation group (Group 3) showed an increased trend in risk, but the result was marginally significant (aOR = 3.01, 95% CI: 0.98–9.27, P = 0.054), while the Latent Decompensation group (Group 2) did not show a significant association with preterm birth (P = 0.200).
This finding was marginally significant ( p = 0.054).