“marginally significant”

The marginally significant three-way interaction among the main effects (ANOVA, P = 0.054, Table 2 ), however, suggested that F v / F m was affected by an interaction between damage and flow that varied between temperatures.

The test on RTs became marginally significant if we used a two-tailed t test ( p = .054), but we felt that a one-tailed test was more appropriate because of our clear prediction.

Very High SES also shows reduced odds, though marginally significant (OR = 0.767, p = 0.054).

The effect of vocabulary was marginally significant ( β = 0.0404 ± 0.026, t (71.04) = 1.96, p = 0.054), suggesting it may have had a small effect on the overall learning in this paradigm.

This analysis revealed a marginally significant effect of the moderator (group) on the relationship between urinary interoception and chronic pelvic pain (Estimate: -0.00440 (SE = 0.00228, Z = -1.93, p = 0.054).

Follow-up paired samples t -tests demonstrated that increased sleepiness during the intervention relative to baseline was significant on Day 2, t (27) = 2.1, p = 0.046 and Day 3, t (25) = 2.4, p = 0.027, was marginally significant on Day 4, t (25) = 2.02, p = 0.054, but was not significant on Day 1, t (23) = 1.4, p = 0.182 or on the Days 5–7, ( p -values > 0.28).

The perceived stress of specialized people (eg, teacher, doctor, government related staff) was marginally significant when compared with company employees or managers ( p =0.054), but significantly higher than other occupations.

Looking at the effect of Language, Mann–Whitney tests were carried out on participants’ RCA scores in each type of display, revealing a significant effect of Language in the Polychrome condition, U = 42, Z = 4.26, p < 0.001; and a marginally significant effect in the Monochrome condition, U = 114, Z = 1.93, p = 0.054, with RCAs being produced more often in English than in Spanish in both types of display.

However, gaming duration had no statistically significant impact on the metacognitive variables (awareness, strategy, planning, and self-checking), with only a marginally significant trend for reduced self-checking at 20 min ( p = 0.054).

For the perceived emotional intensity of AM events, the effect of narrative perspective was marginally significant, p = .054, based on the p -value of 0.05 criterion.

Dexterity was a marginally significant predictor, β = 0.221, p = 0.054, whereas graphomotor skill was not, β = −0.183, p = 0.110.

Urine concentration of 3-BPA in ASD children had higher values than in the control group, which were marginally significant ( p = 0.054).

The results with both incident and prevalent cohorts of the Nun Study show that ApoE4 promotes the cognitive decline of a subject, in that an ApoE4 carrier is expected to have a relatively longer time of the transition from MCI back to intact cognition ( p value = 0.011); a higher risk of being in MCI, which is marginally significant ( p value = 0.054); and a shorter time of the transition from MCI to dementia ( p value = 0.032), compared to a non-carrier.

Support for Sociopolitically Inspired Solutions to the Organ Shortage A similar ANCOVA on support resulted in main effects of registration status, F (2, 1214) = 207.06, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.26; and sociopolitical viewpoint, F (2, 1214) = 7.49, p < 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.01; as well as a marginally significant interaction between these two variables, F (4, 1214) = 2.34, p = 0.054, partial η 2 = 0.01.

Also, troponin I was higher in male than in female patients and this difference was marginally significant (p=0.054).

However, we did find a marginally significant dose-response relationship for the number of completed modules and anxiety symptoms at 6 months ( b = − 0.204, p = 0 .054), indicating that adherence increases as anxiety symptoms decrease. 3.6 Moderation Table 5 shows the group × moderator interaction effects on the MHC-SF for each pre-specified moderator (age, gender, education, positive and negative life-events, extraversion, neuroticism and conscientiousness).

This analysis revealed a marginally significant main effect of treatment ( F (1, 18) = 4.264, p = .054, ή p 2 = 0.192) and a significant interaction between treatment and TRP:ΣLNAA ratios ( F (1, 18) = 9.399, p = .007, ή p 2 = 0.343).

A mixed ANOVA with Group, Trial type and Block as factors revealed a marginally significant main effect of group [ F (1,10) = 4.78, p = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.32], and significant main effects of trial type [ F (1,10) = 39.37, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.80], and block [ F (17,170) = 19.31, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.66].

The statistical results revealed a significant main effect of time ( F (1.15, 48.43) = 60.40, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.59), no group effect ( F (1.42) = 1.22, p = 0.275, η p 2 = 0.03), and a marginally significant group × time interaction ( F (1.15, 48.43) = 3.71, p = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.08).

The correlation between non-agricultural employment and wage income (Path b) is marginally significant (b = 0.024, z = 1.925, p = 0.054).

When the third tertile patients were compared with the second tertile, we found marginally significant higher primary event and ICU admission ( p = 0.054).

The model was marginally significant ( R 2 = 0.16; F 3,42 = 2.76, p = 0.054, f 2 = 0.20) and the factor EC remained a significant predictor of the behavioral index ( β = 0.40, F 1,42 = 7.49, p = 0.009, η p 2 = 0.15).

Also, there was a marginally significant effect for GCS on LH ( p = 0.054), showing that women with TBI with more mild injury had marginally higher LH levels over 72 hours compared to women with lower GCS.

Comparable analyses demonstrated a marginally significant relationship between pre- to post-treatment changes in the covert fear vs neutral contrasts and PTSD symptom slopes for modularity (B = .29, t = 2.09; p = .054), but not global efficiency (B = -.21; t = -1.59; p = .13).

By contrast, overall vocabulary scores were strongly correlated with how many words children learned r ( 34 ) = .464 , p = .004 , and as expected, older children learned more words than younger children, though this was only a marginally significant difference, t ( 35 ) = 1.99 , p = .054 (see Fig. 5 ).