“marginally significant”

Diet Quality with Mild Thermal Exposure and Extended Time of Thermal Exposure The two-level factorial experiment yielded significant response surface models for larval weight ( p < 0.0015, F 3,7 = 16.27), molt to 2nd instar ( p = 0.0410, F 3,7 = 4.76), molt to 3rd instar ( p = 0.0100, F 3,7 = 8.46) and a marginally significant model for survival ( p = 0.0531, F 3,7 = 4.23) ( Table 2 ).

Two-way ANOVA of normalized Z-anxiety scores (reflecting EPM, OFT, NSF, NIH) revealed a marginally significant stress*drug interaction ( F 1,36 = 3.996; p = 0.0532; shown in Fig. 2 a) with no main effect of stress or drug.

Regarding the incidence of SCM, there was an effect of the bedding surface temperature, although it was marginally significant ( p = 0.0532; R 2 = 0.16; Figure 2 B), following a second order polynomial one indicating a curvilinear relationship.

The tax was associated with a marginally significant negative trend in initiation for young adults (p = .0532) [ 63 ].

Inhibiting vHipp terminals in the IL during extinction blocked the effects of extinction, although the effect was marginally significant due to reduced power after disaggregation (CUS/extinction/EGFP vs CUS/extinction/Gi, P = .0532).

There was a marginally significant difference (p = .0533) between views of videos on other facial dermatoses and those on other dermatological diseases.

Moreover, the relationship remained significant ( α = 0.05) even after regressing out the effect of initial performance (Spearman's rank correlation: ρ = −0.5614, P = 0.0138) or after regressing out the effects of both initial and final performances (Spearman's rank correlation: ρ = −0.4684, P = 0.0448), and became marginally significant after regressing out the effect of final performance (Spearman's rank correlation: ρ = −0.4526, P = 0.0533).

Perivascular stranding and anal sphincter invasion were statistically significant for liver metastasis (p = 0.0077 and p = 0.0471), while extramural vascular invasion based on MRI (mrEMVI) was marginally significant (p = 0.0534).

- line 243: "Only a marginally significant association 244 between SFV and HTLV co-infection was observed (χ2 p-value= 0.0534).". => Is a Fisher exact test not better suited here? > m <- matrix(data = c(3,14,162,2872), nrow = 2, ncol = 2, byrow = T) > m [,1] [,2] [1,] 3 14 [2,] 162 2872 > fisher.test(x = m) Fisher's Exact Test for Count Data data: m p-value = 0.06041 alternative hypothesis: true odds ratio is not equal to 1 95 percent confidence interval: 0.6925923 13.7944348 sample estimates: odds ratio 3.795586 ########### discussion: ########### - "The overall HTLV seroprevalence in our population was 5.4% ....

The magnitude of the decrease, however, was different depending on whether the neighbouring pair had reproduced successfully or not: unsuccessful females that had observed another unsuccessful pair decreased their preference for their breeding partner by only 8.0%, which is not significantly different from zero (unilateral t-test: t 5 = 0.134, P = 0.134), whereas, unsuccessful females whose neighbours had reproduced successfully spent 42.5% more time with the neighbouring male after reproducing, which is a marginally significant change (unilateral t-test: t 5 = 2.284, P = 0.0534).

Interestingly, a marginally significant correlation ( P = 0.0535) was observed in SMA1 patients between the baseline IL-10 levels and changes in motor scores after 6 months of nusinersen treatment (Fig. 3 G).

In addition, increased neutrophils also correlated with hypertension with a marginally significant p-value ( p = 0.0535).

Retinol concentration exhibited a decreasing trend across pregnancy although the changes were marginally significant [β: -0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.01–0.00; p -value = 0.0535] ( Fig 2A ).

In the IT dataset, average gains were higher at +1.1% AUC yet marginally significant ( P = 0.0535).

More importantly, a marginally significant reduction in fold-change of lung CFUs was observed in the 12.5 μg Fc-E430G DMAb ( p=0.0535 ) when compared to Fc-WT DMAb with a significant reduction in the nasal wash in animals given 25 μg Fc-E430G ( p=0.0316 ) compared to WT-Fc ( Figures 5E, G ; Supplementary Figures S2 and S3 ).

A statistically significant difference across the countries was observed for access to cancer screening ( P = 0.004), and a marginally significant difference for psychological and psychiatric care ( P = 0.0536).

The HR for V60 Gy (1.06) was marginally significant ( p = 0.0536).

The correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation for visual ( P = 0.0042) and nociceptive somatosensory ( P = 1.34268 × 10 –9 ), and a marginally significant correlation for auditory ( P = 0.0536).

Finally, the three treatment groups (IVB, VB, and VIB) displayed statistically similar results for hemorrhage (p = 0.1847) and marginally significant differences with regard to histological changes (p = 0.0537) ( table 5 ; figures 6A-F ).

Among these, FiO2 demonstrated a marginally significant association with training outcomes (ES = 3.84, SE = 1.99, p = 0.0537), suggesting a potential—but not conclusive—moderating role.

For general self-efficacy, however, there was only a marginally significant effect of confidence with health plan ( p = 0.0538).

The improvement was marginally significant in the multivariant analysis of: dry mouth, dysgeusia, pain and the treatment ( p =0.0538).

In the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for luspatercept‐treated patients (Table 4 ), the exposure‐associated reduction in TEAEs was marginally significant ( P = .0538) for TEAEs ≥ grade 3 and statistically significant for bone pain ≥ grade 1 ( P = .0153) after adjusting for the effects of baseline risk factors.

When the analysis focused on H63D homozygotes compared to WT HFE patients, the survival difference was marginally significant (p = 0.0539) ( S4A Fig ).

The pooled model revealed that this difference in selection affecting urban and forest CS was marginally significant (CS × habitat interaction, p = 0.054; table 4 ).