“marginally significant”

The exception was a marginally significant value (P = 0.014) for the T 10 HA-TDP-43/S 11 β1-TDP-43/GFP 1–9 complex, confirming the strongly reduced - but detectable - penchant of S 11 to generate triFC when compared to T 11 .

Further, the interaction between smoking and age was marginally significant (IRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98–1.00, p = 0.014).

Surprisingly, we found a main effect of location, F (3, 39) = 4.34, P = 0.010, η p 2 = 0.25, 95% CI η = [0.02, 0.41], which was driven by a lower postsaccadic contrast sensitivity after upward saccades (15.00 ± 3.16) compared to the other directions [rightward: 29.49 ± 4.76; P = 0.015, 95% CI = (0.91, 28.05); leftward: 26.23 ± 3.64; P = 0.054, 95% CI = (−2.34, 24.80), marginally significant; downward: 30.85 ± 2.77; P = 0.014, 95% CI = (2.28, 29.42)] ( Fig. 4 ).

Second, there was a marginally significant interaction between intervention group and the quadratic slope for time, t(188.4) = 2.48, P = .014, d = 0.36.

For radiological infarction, craniotomy type was significant and PCA involvement was marginally significant (craniotomy type, P =0.014; PCA involvement, P =0.059).

Although the effect of sequence was marginally significant in the ANOVA, response times averaged across all trials were also 71 ms faster in the outward than in the inward condition ( p = 0.014, t = 2.59, BF = 3.1), consistent with previous studies using looming/receding stimuli ( Cappe et al., 2009 ; Tyll et al., 2013 ).

Gene-expression differences between chromosome-level clusters were marginally significant (F 2,28 = 4.99 and P = 0.014), with cluster IV-β having the highest mean expression and IV-α the lowest (mean expression and SE for chromosome II: 2c343.4 ± 423 FPKM, chromosome IV-α: 1,263.3 ± 276 FPKM, and chromosome IV-β: 3150.5 ± 406).

In GOLDN, SNP rs1183319 had significant and marginally significant interactions with dietary MUFA ( P = 0.014) and PUFA ( P = 0.051) for fasting glucose (data not shown).

perplexus (11.1%), this difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.015; FET), in contrast to a comparison of Nosema infection of B. vagans (20.3%), where the difference with B. impatiens was highly significant ( p < 0.0001; FET).

Marginally significant change in D-COP ML ( p = 0.015, CI 95 %: (−22.287, −2.557)) and D-COP PL ( p = 0.017, CI 95 %: (−39.593, −4.197)) from pre- to post-intervention was also observed within this group ( Table 2 ).

Except for BMI ( β = − 0.137, t (186) = -1.95, p = .053) and physical activity ( β = − 0.137, t (186) = -1.93, p = .056), which were marginally significant, fruit and vegetable consumption ( β = 0.182, t (186) = 2.57, p . < 0.001) and the duration of physical activity ( β = 0.173, t (186) = 2,46, p = .015) were significantly related to the number of REM sleep periods (Table 4 ).

Longitudinal cognitive changes Among CN, we observed significant time‐by‐group (G–T– and G–T+) interaction on longitudinal MMSE change (time x group G–T–: β = 0.282, p < 0.001; time × group G–T+: β = 0.240, p = 0.012), and a marginally significant interaction of time‐by‐group G+T– on MMSE after the multiple comparison correction (time × group G+T–: β = 0.220, p = 0.015) (Figure 1A ).

The supplementary regression results demonstrated that the priority cross-disease genes exhibited significant or marginally significant associations with eosinophil infiltration status in the full-sample logistic regression ( RTN3 : p = 0.015; MAP4K3 : p = 0.062, marginally significant), while neither gene reached a statistically significant correlation in the beta regression restricted to non-zero eosinophil samples ( RTN3 : p = 0.056, marginally significant; MAP4K3 : p = 0.149).

The mixed-effects regression analysis revealed a significant effect of association for accuracy and a marginally significant effect for reaction time, where higher association between the two words increased accuracy ( t = 2.43, Cohen's d = 0.38, p = 0.015) and reduced reaction time ( t = −1.8, Cohen's d = 0.21, p = 0.08).

Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in urea nitrogen reduction rate and urea nitrogen clearance rate ( P < 0.001), and a marginally significant difference in vascular pathway blood flow ( P = 0.015).

Marginally significant differences were observed for radius vs. femur and fibula ( P = 0.015 and P = 0.03 respectively), whereas no difference was observed between radius and tibia ( P = 0.8).

A marginally significant trend of improvement was only observed in the PDQ-39, favouring the intervention group ( P = .015).

Only one SNP, rs8006686 in MTHFD1 , showed a marginally significant association with PXFS (p=0.015; OR=2.07, 95%CI: 1.16, 3.71) and PXFG (p=0.015; OR=2.23, 95%CI: 1.19, 4.16).

Although, the difference was small, it was marginally significant (RR: 0.98; p=0.015; 95% CI 0.97 to 1.00).

mtDNA HVR1 was less strongly correlated to isolation by distance ( r = 0.312), though marginally significant ( P = 0.015).

There was also a marginally significant effect of the word Age of Acquisition ( p = 0.015).

40 Here, sex was revealed as having a marginally significant effect ( p = 0.015) on age at onset ( table 1 , model 1c, r 2 = 0.257, p = 1.2 × 10 −14 ).

However, the changes of FC between the right putamen and right thalamus showed marginally significant correlation with the change of the executive function ( r = 0.7071, p = 0.0150, Figure 6 ).

In the Lambda Wave components, a significant or marginally significant difference, in the case of L2, was observed, with faces with averted (L1, p = 0.015; L2, p = 0.095; L3, p = 0.042; L4, p = 0.009) and direct gaze (L1, p = 0.035; L2, p = 0.041; L3, p = 0.048; L4, p = 0.005) showing smaller/more negative amplitudes than buildings. 4.

However, the difference in maximum OA dose between Brainlab DCA and Eclipse VMAT plans are marginally significant with P ‐value = 0.015.