Of these, lag5 was the most significant ( p = 0.003); lag3 and lag4 were marginally significant ( p = 0.053; p = 0.081).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
The participants’ assessments of the level of Japanese art were slightly lower than those of the general Japanese public in the crude analysis, and the difference was marginally significant ( p = .053) after statistical adjustments were made for age, gender, and education.
Overall, these different forms of interteaching-to-interteaching comparisons yielded a small and marginally significant summary effect size ( g = 0.298, p = .053, 95% CI [− 0.004 to 0.601]).
In the children's group, the intervention significantly increased scores for MVPA ( t = −2.11, df = 23, and p < 0.05) and playing together (marginally significant effect: Z = 1.93; p = 0.053) and significantly decreased scores for self-esteem of physical fitness ( Z = 2.21; p < 0.05).
Multiple regression analysis showed a negative association between PM 2.5 exposure and FVC% predicted (− 2.81%, 95% CI − 5.27 to − 0.34%, P = 0.027) and a marginally significant negative correlation with FVC (− 114.38 ml, 95% CI − 230.36 to 1.59 ml, P = 0.053).
The Line × Density interaction had a marginally significant effect on offspring length ( figure 2 c ; table 2 ), which seemed to be longer in LB than in SB populations, but only under high medaka density (adj p = 0.053; electronic supplementary material, table S3.A).
Without multiple test correction, one additional hospital with high PWD was found to be marginally significant (p=0.053).
The multivariate analysis identified radicular pain as a marginally significant predictor of spinal cord injury (P = 0.053).
The global sex-by-covariate interaction test was marginally significant (χ2 (13) =22.15; p=0.053), which suggests the presence of possible sex differences in the associations.
For P1 latencies, the interaction of face age × participant gender was significant, F (1, 38) = 4.17, P = 0.048, η p 2 = 0.10, as latencies to peak in response to adults were significantly slower for males ( M = 147.85 ms) than females ( M = 134.97 ms, P = 0.001). N170 For N170 amplitudes, the effect of face age was marginally significant, F (1, 47) = 3.95, P = 0.053, η p 2 = 0.08.
In the self-initiated condition, O showed no significant arm motion in the pre-MI period ( χ 2 (1) = 1.34, p = 0.25) and Y showed marginally significant forward motion ( χ 2 (1) = 3.76, p = 0.053).
A Games‐Howell post hoc test that contrasted self‐initiated cheaters ( M = 3.62, SD = 0.54) with fair players ( M = 3.37, SD = 0.78) revealed a marginally significant effect of Extraversion ( p = .053, d between = 0.41).
However, significant or marginally significant clusters can be found in the unattended condition (permutation test with small volume correction: cluster p = 0.053 for the contralateral SC, and p < 0.001 for the ipsilateral SC.
Finally, there was a marginally significant ( p = 0.053) result showing more non-LE state doctors (M = 6.96, SD = 9.97) than LE state doctors (M = 5.27, SD = 8.39) directly told patients their Lyme disease symptoms were just in their head (i.e., psychosomatic).
There was a marginally significant trend toward a lower atelectasis rate in Group T (OR = 0.059, 95% CI: 0.003–1.032, P = .053).
The results are shown in Table 7 , the difference between G0 and G2 is marginally significant ( p = 0.053), and the difference between G0 and the other two layout methods, G1 and G3, is not significant ( p > 0.05); the difference between G1 and G2 Significant ( p = 0.037), the difference between G1 and G3 was not significant ( p = 0.101); the difference between G2 and G3 was not significant ( p = 0.653).
It is noteworthy that “my supervisor used my data in papers/patents without acknowledging my contribution” was also marginally significant difference ( p = 0.053) among the three major science categories. • “my supervisor took away or threatened to take away my funding” Follow up analyses of standardized residuals indicate that participants in Engineering experienced higher than expected rates of four of the five contextual behaviors: visa cancellation threats, lab stays, threats to funding and unacknowledged use of data ( Figure 2 ).
A marginally significant parental status × emotion interaction effect was found [ F (6, 460.490) = 2.088, p = .053, η 2 = .026].
There was a marginally significant difference in the adequate protection rates for the fold type before and during intubation using a direct laryngoscope ( P = 0.053) ( Figure 3 ). 3.4.
MGMT methylation had a marginally significant improvement in OS (HR = 0.43, 0.18–1.01, p = 0.053).
Peer social skills was marginally significant in predicting fearfulness ( B = −0.13, p = .053).
The separate ANOVA for humans only found a marginally significant effect of sound type ( F (2,42) = 3.157, p = 0.053) ( η 2 = 0.131), revealing that humans performed slightly higher on the extreme and within-category intermediate sounds than on the trained sounds.
Lastly, there was a marginally significant interaction for the disadvantaged gender group by age group by participant gender ( F (1, 138) = 3.01, p = .053, η p 2 = .04).
The interaction was marginally significant for the outcome suicidality (F 2,80 =3.06, P =0.053).
In the 0-back version, a main effect of Emotion (F(2,102) = 4.75, p = 0.01, η 2 = 0.09) and a marginally significant Task by Emotion interaction (F(2,102) = 3.02, p = 0.053, η 2 = 0.06) emerged.