“marginally significant”

A p value <0.05 was considered marginally significant, and a p value <0.01 was considered significant.

Results : In the total population, a marginally significant positive correlation was observed between mtDNA copy number (mtDNA-CN) and serum 25(OH)D 3 levels (r = 0.210; p = 0.010), which did not remain significant after Bonferroni correction.

When we compared the module eigengene values between clinical groups we found that two modules, Mod5 (green) and Mod7 (black), were marginally significant (T-test; unadjusted P-value < 0.01) and suggestive (T-test; unadjusted P-value < 0.05) respectively with one-year relapse free survival (RFS) (Fig. 1 c).

For example, for early expression response, enriched GO categories include clathrin-mediated endocytosis 43 , autophagosome assembly , positive regulation of type I interferon (IFN-I) production 40 , 41 and innate immune response (marginally significant at p=0.01004).

Comparison of MTA1 and DNMT3a expression in the human normal liver and HCC specimens produced a significant correlation coefficient >0.5 ( r =0.5686, P =0.0001) for DNMT3a, and a marginally significant coefficient ( r =0.3162, P =0.0103) for DNMT3b.

In females, only fasting blood glucose retained marginally significant with per 1 mmol/L increment corresponding to a 7% (multivariate-adjusted HR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.02–1.12; P = 0.011) increased risk. 3.4 Survival Tree Analyses Depicted in Fig. 3 , Fig. 4 are survival trees on the basis of metabolic risk factors along with clinicopathologic characteristics and the corresponding Kaplan-Meier curves in males and females, respectively.

At 100 μm layer thickness, highly significant differences were detected for all pairwise comparisons in Anycubic, Elegoo, and eSUN ( p < 0.001, Tukey HSD), except for the Connector–Extended contrast in eSUN, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.011).

Further, only a marginally significant association between the proportion of neurons and VS grade can be observed in the brain regions of our study (p=0.011, Figure 1B ).

At 4% Pt and 12% Pt, the effect of Ht was less marked, however some marginally significant differences were seen between assays set up at varying Ht (Figure 3B , ANOVA, replicate 1, p = 0.011, replicate 2, p = 0.061; Figure 3C , ANOVA, replicate 1, p = 0.021, replicate 2, p = 0.053).

Consequently, in central populations, the HE value of late-opening flowers decreased from 1.65 to 1.45 mm in the S-morph and from 1.53 to 1.27 mm in the L-morph, but the RHE value showed no significant decline in the S-morph ( P > 0.05) and only a marginally significant decrease in the L-morph ( P = 0.011).

Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative CEA (hazard ratio [HR], 2.728; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.832–8.944, P = .098) and 18p TERRA expression (HR, 0.113; 95% CI, 0.011–1.126, P = .071) were marginally significant independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), whereas preoperative CEA (HR, 4.254; 95% CI, 1.394–12.985, P = .011) and 18p TERRA expression (HR, 0.108; 95% CI, 0.011–1.037, P = .054) were significant independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS).

While the increase was not significant in the t-test ( p = 0.08), the Wilcoxon test yielded a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.011).

2 a; r s (11) = 0.785, p = 0.001), and a marginally significant positive relationship was revealed between chronological age and scores on the generalized anxiety disorder subscale (Fig. 2 d; r s (11) = 0.680, p = 0.011).

However, the PANSS Cognitive factor was found to have only a marginally significant association with the NSA-16 Motor Retardation factor (r=0.304, p=0.012) and with the NSA-16 Composite score (r=0.264, p=0.031) and was not found to correlate with any other NSA-16 factors.

Surprisingly, there was also more happiness emotions in the fearful condition ( M = 3.37, SD = 1.84) than in the angry condition ( M = 2.46, SD = 1.41) at a marginally significant level (α = .01), t (83) = −2.57, p = .012.

Among women, all sex hormones showed significant genetic correlation with serum urate (ToT: r g = 0.092, [95% CI: 0.034, 0.150], and p = 0.002; BioT: r g = −0.076, [95% CI: −0.129, −0.022], and p = 0.006; SHBG: r g = −0.226, [95% CI: −0.294, −0.157], and p = 8.76 × 10 −11 ; age at menarche: r g = −0.131, [95% CI: −0.173, −0.089], and p = 8.15 × 10 −10 ; and age at menopause: r g = −0.076, [95% CI: −0.128, −0.023], and p = 0.005), expect that estradiol showed marginally significant correlation with serum urate ( r g = −0.248, [95% CI: −0.442, −0.054], and p = 0.012).

Empathy and narrative transportation Individual narrative transportation ratings were higher for individuals with higher dispositional empathy, though this effect became marginally significant after multiple comparison correction (Table S4 ; β = 0.10, 95% CI [0.02, 0.17], uncorrected p = 0.012, FDRp = 0.052).

In addition, the analysis found a marginally significant effect of tempo, F (1,266) = 6.35, p = 0.012, where GC values tended to be greater in the Fast Song compared to the Slow Song.

The Arg/Pro heterozygous genotype also confers 2.126 times more odds of developing cervical cancer with a marginally significant P value (adjusted OR = 2.126, 95% CI = 1.181–3.827, P = 0.012).

Furthermore, ofCS‐modified CD44 expression was associated with poorer OS, although this association was marginally significant in the validation cohort (HR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.15–2.99; p = 0.012, and HR: 1.71; 95% CI: 0.99–2.94; p = 0.052 for training cohort and validation cohort, respectively).

The results indicate that the negative correlation between divergence and intron length is significant in first introns, while the test statistic for non-first introns is marginally significant (first: R s = -0.271, P = 0.012; non-first: R s = -0.089, P = 0.046).

There was also a marginally significant relationship between control skin and historical Skin 1 ( P = 0.012, α = 0.01); however, it explained only a very small amount of the variation in Skin 1 transcript abundance (0.4%; S1 Data ).

In the left hemisphere, these differences were marginally significant after adjusting for covariates and correcting by FDR (ß = -1.81; s.e. = 0.71; p = 0.012; p FDR = 0.06; R 2 = 0.25), while no interaction between sex and age was found (Table S7 , Supplementary Materials 1).

As expected, the same negative (and marginally significant) correlation was found between the gap width and the palatal shelf width ( R 2 = 12.9%; p = 0.0122; not shown).

The results were marginally significant for the affective dimension of shame, but did not pass Bonferroni corrections (Shame-NSE, β = 0.18, p = 0.0125, uncorrected), and were not significant for the behavioral dimension of shame (Shame-W, β = 0.05, p = 0.46, uncorrected).